WTF news story of the day

[Fardwark]

Why the Mail? Because I saw it on facebook and thought people here might also like to start their morning off with something terrible. That way, their day can only get better.

Rhubarb! Show me that odious rag first thing of a morn & I'll be like a bear with a sore head the rest of the day. A right bloody growler.

 

[bertzie]

Rhubarb goes well in pie.

 

[Fardwark]

Rhubarb goes well in pie.

It does that Berts. As yi know, you got to have a sweetener to temper the sour, tart of the baking hot pie.

A great big dollop of clotted cream does it for me every time.

What's yer thing?

 

[bertzie]

I prefer whipped cream myself, though in the interest of full disclosure, I've never actually had clotted cream before.

 

[Sinmastah]

How ****ed up in the mind do you have to be to get going off child porn?

 

[bertzie]

I imagine very. In some places it's actually classified as a mental illness.

 

[Thundergod]

Bunch of pussies. Click on it already so you can tell me what was inside. Without the horrible unbearable details.

 

[Thundergod]

Wait a minute... I just read the article and it was not bad, in fact I agree with many of the things said. What got my attention was a picture with the description "Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google".

 

[Fardwark]

I prefer whipped cream myself, though in the interest of full disclosure, I've never actually had clotted cream before.

Try it out. Whipped is second but a huge drop off from the Clot.

 

[Shawn Lutz]

it illegal to look at regardless of your intent,,,you reap what you sow. Ask pervert Pete Townsend who was looking at it for "research" purposes. Ther eis NO REASON whatsoever to look at child porn..NO reason unless you are part of a law enforcement investigation and busting people for it.

No sympathy here for said "journalist".

 

[Shadowplayer]

I'm not sure if i should click on that link

dont

 

[MineGoesTo11]

People should not go looking for child porn for news stories. There are already law enforcement divisions the world over specifically for dealing with these kinds of things. This kind of "journalism" is akin to someone going outside to tell everyone how the sky is blue. I can absolutely guarantee that her "article" will be of no help to any law enforcement, or anyone that has the authority to deal with these kinds of things. Hell, even Google has a division specifically for finding and removing child porn from their searches.

Yes, journalists should just play it safe and reprint government press releases and blog about the Kardashians.That way, we never have to worry about the burden of knowing about things that aren't Kim Kardashian's ass.