MenaceMartin
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 9,900
- Reaction score
- 16,176
Good riddance. I can only hope that the UK follows suit.
I agree for the most part with this and what @PeteK said in post 20. The difference here is that in the "public square" there were consequences for your free speech. Until we can, and do hold people responsible for their free speech, the shit show will continue.Don't get me wrong, I am glad that platform is going away. They all should go away.
But, it does bear saying that free speech should be universally free, not only the speech some find acceptable.
The pornography industry is about to get a huge dose of "your free speech is not acceptable", too. And, that one was already asked & answered.
I’ll drink to that!Zero F*cks given by me.
But I love that the solution is for EM*sk to buy it.
I am sure that will be for the greater good.![]()
I agree for the most part with this and what @PeteK said in post 20. The difference here is that in the "public square" there were consequences for your free speech. Until we can, and do hold people responsible for their free speech, the shit show will continue.
What a goddamn beta pussy. He/she/they needs his ass gay bashed in public every day of the week. Jesus H
This is a national security issue and it’s an insecurity issue for tic tokkers, it needs to go away along with a few other platforms.
Facebook is filled with false ads, polls, statements and other shit designed to slowly erode the American people’s confidence in each other and it’s destroying their individuality
Society as a whole has become dependent on others for their opinions of self that they take pics of themselves daily in some cunty pose and post it publicly for clicks and likes.
We are being destroyed and no one cares
It's like they use the argument that the "public" got too big, so now we have to intervene. Would we still have had a 1a if the public during the founding fathers time were able to speak instantly to billions of people? I'm not so sure the answer is yes. I'm not advocating to change it, but it is definitely a different scenario than what existed a couple hundred years ago.Absolutely correct. Social Media will be one of the major contributors to the downfall of our society. And, there is not a fucking thing we can do about it.
Because, to fix that, we either have to alter 1A, or just say, "Fuck the rules. I/we know better." Apparently, we are doing the latter.
You cannot pick and choose what speech is free, and what speech is not free. And, we certainly do not want the fucking morality police making that choice, either.
But, here we go.
Then it doesn't work in America anymore.Free speech only works when sane people are the ones speaking and listening.
You do realise that probably 80% of all people aren’t as smart as you…?Already apps to get around it, if it does. So useless.
Free speech only works when sane people are the ones speaking and listening.