Why Do YOU Like Norlins?

swampblues

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
4,229
Reaction score
3,277
Anyone ever seen Brian Robertson of thin lizzy play his 73 with pafs, if not go to youtube pull up Gary Moores tribute to Phil and watch him and Gary play still in love with you. Awesome sounding 73
 

moreles

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
3,281
Reaction score
1,960
I just get tired of the generalizations. Norlin ownership of Gibson saw the production of fairly inconsistent Les Pauls with some changed specs; it saw the introduction of the gorgeous, high-end L5S. It saw a high-end component (multipiece maple necks) used in place of a beloved old component (mahogany necks). It saw both clunky clownbursting and some gorgeous finishes (L5S again). It's easy to pick out some negatives instituted under Norlin ownership for financial, non-musical reasons (such as the pancake body to pre-empt splitting... solving a problem that didn't exist to begin with!) But isn't this mostly just normal corporate bungling, experimenting, and profiteering? Fenders of the same time period, and Martins as well, have their own weaknesses. I see the anti-Norlin sentiment as a late-developing over-reaction to fairly conventional industrialization. It's easy to pick on a feature or two -- some of those finishes are hideous -- and turn that into a blanket condemnation. But thinking back to that time, I don't recall people thinking these instruments were overpriced or cruddy. Norlin-era Gibson put a load of guitars into players' hands, and the people I know were happy to own one. I find almost no great Norlins, it's true, but plenty of good ones.
 

DarrellV

Sharp as a bowlin' ball! Oh, Look! ..SQUIRREL!
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
20,577
Reaction score
51,262
The thing I don't get is this right here...


Alembic makes sandwich guitars with like a bajillion layers and a dozen different woods laminated all the way through and six ways from Sunday,

and it makes them high quality, elite and dang expensive guitars! :wow:

Gibson did it for strengthening and only used 2 woods and 3 layers and they're considered inferior? :wtf:
 

bgh

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
346
Reaction score
370
Context: Both my LPC and my SG are Norlin-era. I have played some SGs and LPs that were not, but don't remember what year.

For me, the non-Norlin guitars didn't "feel" right. I know that is a very subjective thing to say, but, bear with me.

I bought both of mine new. So, I have had 1 (the SG) for over 4 decades, and the other for almost 4 decades. In that time, every aspect of those guitars has become second nature to me. I know exactly how the neck feels at each position. I know exactly how the guitar is going to respond to what I do.

In short, I know what I can say with those guitars, because I know them so well.

When I tried a newer LP, the aggregate of all of the updates and such combined in a way that made it feel foreign to me. (I suspect if I had a newer one and took the time to learn it like I did my LP, I would feel differently.)

Please understand also, being a lefty, I have not had the wide selection of LPs and SGs to select from that right-handed players get. When we walk into a store, we are relegated to whatever happens to be on the wall. Actually, not a good way to sample the newer models.

I did get a chance to try a 2005 Epi LP. It was a lot lighter than mine. It sounded good and played well. But, it didn't have that low-end growl mine has. Come to think of it, I cannot think of many others I have played that have that same growl.
 

grumphh

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
857
Reaction score
558
For me, the non-Norlin guitars didn't "feel" right. I know that is a very subjective thing to say,
Well, i'll have to admit, that after having owned and played the solid build Norlin Gibsons ever since i got my first Gibsom some 25 - 30 years ago and then trying to pick up a modern Custom in a guitar shop, (just for the hell of it, because i don't go to guitar stores for instruments), i felt rather underwhelmed with the current Custom.
It was light, and simply "felt" cheap - wrong neck shape, weird finish and all in all just very different from the old Norlins i have tried - in fact it felt very much like a 70's Japanese copy guitar that i also own - except that the finish on the copy feels less plasticky...

Weirdly enough, one of my favourite guitars is a '09 Explorer which feels (and sounds) just right - but that one has its neck sanded down before i got it...

I guess it would take be a pretty heavy modern LP to convince me they are still any good - the light ones i have tried just felt wrong :D
 

ARandall

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2012
Messages
12,757
Reaction score
8,461
The thing I don't get is this right here...


Alembic makes sandwich guitars with like a bajillion layers and a dozen different woods laminated all the way through and six ways from Sunday,

and it makes them high quality, elite and dang expensive guitars! :wow:

Gibson did it for strengthening and only used 2 woods and 3 layers and they're considered inferior? :wtf:
If Alembelic had a 50's era model that didn't have that type of construction and had gained an iconic rep, then maybe the same prejudice would have been applied.
 

zamdrang

Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
94
Reaction score
129
I loved my custom until I came to the forums and had the aristocracy educate me on on how inferior it is.

That's a joke.. in all seriousness the thing is an 11 lb tank, it has a personality all it's own, great 60ish neck, it plays really really nice. Any praise for the Tim Shaw pups I do not agree with. They are ok but nothing special...I can find some good tones but are noisy and leave a LOT to be desired in a band setting.

LesPaul012.jpg
 

ARandall

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2012
Messages
12,757
Reaction score
8,461
^ Knopfler made the Shaws work pretty well on the Money For Nothing album.....
 

jenton70

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,943
Reaction score
3,727
I like them because the Deluxe has the best neck pickup sound there is in my opinion! Mine plays great and if I had to record an album and only was allowed one guitar this would be it. I love my replica and historics but the mini-hums are the stuff.

 

brianbzed

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
2,344
Reaction score
1,270
Whats not to like? Mainly for me its how the feel and play.:jam:View attachment 286497View attachment 286498
We couldn't afford a Gibson guitar like our heroes Page,Townsend,Kossoff,Allman,Thin Lizzy, when we were getting started. Only the rich kids in school got them. We made due with Japanese lawsuit copies. Bought my first Gibson-1983 Norlin. Still have it!
 

bungle

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
2,693
Reaction score
3,319
We couldn't afford a Gibson guitar like our heroes Page,Townsend,Kossoff,Allman,Thin Lizzy, when we were getting started. Only the rich kids in school got them. We made due with Japanese lawsuit copies. Bought my first Gibson-1983 Norlin. Still have it!
That was me. Got a Les Paul out of the Sears catalogue. Harmony?Then moved up to a Japanese Vantage.
 

Attachments

cherrysunburst00

I don't even care about the pat cictures anymore
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2015
Messages
15,468
Reaction score
29,422
Simple. I love Lesters. Period.

As for Norlins, I love the quirkiness: Mostly pancake bodies, volutes, mini-buckers.

And then there's the goof rings.
 




Top