Phillycheez402
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2021
- Messages
- 376
- Reaction score
- 628
Please get those red pickup rings off of there quick. Thanks so much.
Please get those red pickup rings off of there quick. Thanks so much.
Please get those red pickup rings off of there quick. Thanks so much.
Please get those red pickup rings off of there quick. Thanks so much.
The price increase has me a non buyer.... was looking at some WW 50s unbursts but at $3175 shipped eek. I had bought x2 standards before for $2500 shipped, now they cant/wont deal.
And sweetwater has the iced tea 50s. A few i saw looked good but again $2899 when they were what $2699 no thanks.
So i grabbed a 2014 traditional used and a H150 custom core Sweetwater marked as a demo but has no damage. Crazy top! Pics dont do it justice.
Yeah, and the red is mod-shop OEM, correct? Like it.no way in fact I’m looking to buy another set of Gibson reds for when I add 3rd pickup red rings are staying
YesYeah, and the red is mod-shop OEM, correct? Like it.
Somebody had to say itIn all of your kowtowing for Gibson, do any of you realise that "AAA" is simply a letter combination that is wholly made up by Gibsons marketing department?
Just look at the guitar you wish to buy, and decide for yourself whether you like its looks.
The end.
Whatever the marketing department calls it is completely irrelevant
Gibson could call a top made from a piece of knotted pine "AAA" and then it would be "AAA"...
...because it is a made up term.
What i find interesting is that so many of you take these marketing terms at face value, rather than just ignoring them for what they are...
Oh and also, Gibsons best tops are called AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH
Freaking beautiful right here2017 AAA Les Paul Standard T Blueberry Burst below, this was a sweet guitar. The 2017 HP's of this model were AAAA tops and had some serious flames.
Before mid year 2021, yes... The unburst had some nice flames and the AA as well as AAA tops were sweet. But right now, seems the flames are far and few between on a lot of the guitars I have looked at. More of a plain top look right now on a lot of the guitars I am seeing.
View attachment 570523 View attachment 570524
In all of your kowtowing for Gibson, do any of you realise that "AAA" is simply a letter combination that is wholly made up by Gibsons marketing department?
Just look at the guitar you wish to buy, and decide for yourself whether you like its looks.
The end.
Whatever the marketing department calls it is completely irrelevant
Gibson could call a top made from a piece of knotted pine "AAA" and then it would be "AAA"...
...because it is a made up term.
What i find interesting is that so many of you take these marketing terms at face value, rather than just ignoring them for what they are...
Oh and also, Gibsons best tops are called AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH
AA, AAA, AAAA, AAA+, AAAA+ and so on is indeed a term Gibson came up with to define how much Flame and Pizazz your guitar top on a particular model will have. I am just stating that the guitars coming out do not match what Gibson is stating is all. Why say a top is AA or AAA if indeed it is more of a plain top guitar. That is what this post is really talking about, where Gibson Marketing came up with a standard so to speak and the new guitars we are seeing are not living up to the standard listed in the Marketing material for the model.
You both are right. And I'd guess most of us aware of that.
PRS has had this problem for years. Some years the 10 tops are no better on average than normal tops from a year previous. Or Artists tops are not better than 10 tops from 5 years ago. It varies depending on what can be sourced.