- Joined
- Jan 21, 2010
- Messages
- 88,098
- Reaction score
- 272,265
sh*t
they're both lesbians
damn
they're both lesbians
damn
Liver is NOT FOOD!
What Epi does best is the Epi-specific hollows & semi-hollows; Sheraton, Casino, Broadway, Emperor, etc. (I leave Riviera because it's been so long since made an actual Riv - which has mini-buckers & Frequenstor).
While I love these, I am not interested in Epi versions of Gibson models - but I realize this is a character flaw on my part.
only 2( Broadway/Emperor) were produced by Epiphone before Gibson bought them in 1957.
I'd take a raw bite out of a squirting heart before I'd eat a liver, no matter how it's cooked.![]()
call me crazy but I don't want to eat things that are part of the urinary system.![]()
From what i've read of the 5 models you mention only 2( Broadway/Emperor) were produced by Epiphone before Gibson bought them in 1957.The Sheraton,Casino,Riv were Gibson designs made by Gibson before production move to Asia in the 70's.(except for a few special/limited edition ones that were made by Gibson in that U.S.)
I can admire that.
I was just trying to make you puke.
how else am I going to get mixed babies and put an end to all this madness?
someone needs to be forward thinking and make the hard choices
I though the Casino was introduced in '61. So were the Casinos Gibson designs made by Gibson with an Epiphone logo before the move to Asia?
Emperor & Broadway are, indeed, pre-Gibson names - though the pre-Gibson, Kalamzoo, & current models thus designated are different beasts.
The Sheraton was developed in the same room as the 335 (as an upscale alternative; that's why it's so much prettier), by the same people, at the same time, and was built on the same assembly lines from '58-'70. They were introduced about a week apart (I can never recall which came out first).
The Casino, while coming later, was likewise quickly fancified from, basically, a 330 to a fancier version (Epi, who had been Gibson's biggest competitor - and lost the game on business decisions, not instrument quality - didn't become a budget line until 1970).
The Riv came, IIRC, a few years after that.
None survived the move to Asia - they were reintroduced later.
My original point being, an Epi LP/SG/V/etc., is a lower-line version of a Gibbie model; there was never a Gibson Sheraton, Emperor, etc.
Oh..Mal..!it was pretty gross,..especially the 'pale yellow' part,..because then I thought of piss and ....SMH
I'd take a raw bite out of a squirting heart before I'd eat a liver, no matter how it's cooked.![]()
call me crazy but I don't want to eat things that are part of the urinary system.![]()
how else am I going to get mixed babies and put an end to all this madness?
someone needs to be forward thinking and make the hard choices
Here's my opinion (like anyone needs another opinion):
With guitars there's a point of diminishing returns. An Epiphone is generally going to be surprising quality compared to some other overseas thing around the same price. And a $2,500 Gibson is going to be surprising quality (in theory anyway) to a $600 Epiphone. Then you jump up to the $4K and $5K R8's and R9's and mostly what you're doing is playing Russian Roulette. Meaning, just because the tag says $5,199 in NO way are you guaranteed an upscale guitar to the $2,500 one. There are definitely features that set them apart, but I debate when it comes to quality. For example, the fret work on my LP Traditional is superior to that of my R9. They're both good, but the price didn't guarantee upscale quality in this case.
There are magical guitars to be had for under $1K. And there are some serious duds to be had for $5K. The notion that you always "get what you pay for" doesn't necessarily apply to guitars - the reason why is that with guitars, (as opposed to electronic gear), there are so many stars that have to align to equal an amazing instrument that the odds are quite low that you're the one who's going to hit that lottery. You'll either need to lower your standards and gloat over that fine looking "monster flame top", or settle for an ugly guitar that's better on many more important accounts. If I blindfolded you to listen to my $800 LP 50's Tribute compared to my LP Traditional, compared to my R9, I seriously doubt you'd peg which is which. In fact, I'd bet money on it.
Or something like that. I may have polarized that bit to make a point. But I've had 'em from $189 to $2k, $3K, $4K and $5K, and I have to say, the best guitars I find are usually the mid-priced models. That means about $2K to 2.5K for Gibson and about $1.5 to $2K for Fender. Anything more expensive than that seems impractical (to me).
Sorry. That's already a thing.
![]()