55 is too big for the room.I got a Sharp 55" 4K UHD Smart TV back in 2018 for $325 delivered from WalMart.com.
It has a great HD picture and had good reviews back then. It still is excellent.
The model # is LC-55Q7030U
![]()
I'm looking at my Sharp owners manual, there's a list of models that it covers on the cover. The list starts at 50" (LC-50Q7000U) and goes to 65" (LC-65Q7090U)55 is too big for the room.
50 is perfect.
Walmart had a few nice ones a few weeks ago in the $279-329 range.
Now the same tvsare $379 and up.
I guess they raise prices so they can have a Memorial Day sale.
Not exactly. The cheap sets tend to have way worse processing. The panel itself is ok, but the processors just cant keep up with motion. I took back a couple different ones for my office/main sports watching TV and ended up with a 7000 Samsung because it was the least expensive that didnt make watching a football game look like Madden on PS2. I have my eye on the Hisense U7G. HDMI 2.1 and 1000nits peak brightness for under $1K is a 65" panel is a screaming bargain. When i was selling the very early CRT based HD big screens, I would have told you you were utterly insane to think you could ever dream of buying a 55" flat panel setfor $350. TVs are just stupid cheapNot being a dick, however, in that size, and in that price range, it really doesn't matter. Just pick the one you like, that has the features you want.
Most everything, including PQ, will be the same regardless of which model you choose.
Agree completely. Much prefer a consistant interface on every TV in the house, so using a Roku or Firestick or an Android box keeps you from having to relearn and reload everything. New TV? Works just like the old one. I snatch up the Firesticks when they run the 4Ks at $29.99. 10 seconds to jailbreak it and its a little cheap android box that will run any app you like.
For the 'smarts' go and get a Roku Box (latest version runs around $80). Then you can get all the streaming services.
The TV: just buy for the screen size, sharpness/color, and price.
One TV I have now I got because it didn't have one of the streaming services they wanted on it. I used a Roku anyway so I just plugged it in and have a great TV for cheap.
The Roku remote is easier to use than the typical TV remote and does all basic TV controls plus has a headphone jack for silent listening.
.
Not exactly. The cheap sets tend to have way worse processing. The panel itself is ok, but the processors just cant keep up with motion. I took back a couple different ones for my office/main sports watching TV and ended up with a 7000 Samsung because it was the least expensive that didnt make watching a football game look like Madden on PS2. I have my eye on the Hisense U7G. HDMI 2.1 and 1000nits peak brightness for under $1K is a 65" panel is a screaming bargain. When i was selling the very early CRT based HD big screens, I would have told you you were utterly insane to think you could ever dream of buying a 55" flat panel setfor $350. TVs are just stupid cheap
Do you have a Costco membership?
Hard to wrong these days. I've had decent luck with the Vizios.
We also just got a Roku a few months ago, and it works pretty well to convert a non-smart TV into a smart TV. But Roku does not get all the streams ... I think it is missing some of the Max streams as it won't let them post their own adverts.
I'm more into the surround sound quality than the picture quality. Even the cheapest picture quality is good to me, but the surround sound now that needs some attention.
This new place were getting is gonna present some issues, as it does not have all the wires run where I need them. And the wife ain't gonna let me run on the walls. Gonna be a challenge.