I hope they do it. It'll make me lots of more money. However good an idea sounds, it would make sense to look at all the angles.
165,000 EVs will require the equivalent of 12 average nuclear power plants to charge. Of course they all won't charge at once or in the same neighborhood but, the average post office with say 50 vehicles will need 360kWhs to charge the fleet...daily. The increase demand on the national power grid would not go unnoticed. An additional unintended consequence will be soaring electricity prices, most of which is created with fossil fuels. Therefore, the price of fossil fuels will rise, too.
Because of their duty cycles (far more usage than average civilian vehicle) they will likely "wear out" their batteries in under three years, requiring new batteries and the disposal or reuse of approximately 25,000 tons of toxic waste (that is exactly how used EV batteries are referred to) every three years (estimating 300lbs of batteries per vehicle). That's $25 million for disposal of said batteries (at today's prices) and $2.1B (best case) in battery replacements every three years or so. I also very much doubt that US EV recycling capacity would be able to handle this volume of batteries in the near future. EV recycling is very inefficient and expensive.
Add to that the fact that there is not enough lithium in the world to satisfy our demand for it. Don't believe me? How about this guy:
![]()
Musk Is Right - Not Enough Lithium for EV Batteries!
Elon Musk tweeted...Lithium prices are up more than 80% this year and nickel prices have gyrated heavily amid trading turmoil in London.www.independentsentinel.com
If we electrify all 166 million registered cars in the USA, that would draw the equivalent of 12,000 average nuke plants. We currently have 86 operational nuke plants in the USA with 2 additional plants under construction. I think that we will be a little light on the power generation side of the equation.
I'm not anti-EV, quite the opposite (my financial wellbeing is directly correlated with EV adoption). However, they are not all that they are cracked up to be and every action causes a reaction. The law of unintended consequences is going to bite us ALL very hard when people start to figure this all out and by then, it'll be too late.
The first hundred millionaire I ever met made his dough printing the color, advertising inserts that went in the newspaper. He had a castle in England. Of course, none of that helped him when his psycho **tch wife's lover killed him in their Hamptons home.*all I get from the USPS is junk mail. maybe they can just start scanning it and send me junk e-mail like everyone else.
actually I do get little stuff from Sweetwater USPS like a cable or capo in a little padded bag. Got a fat check in the mail earlier this year and I tell ya I was not convinced it was going to make it until it hit the box.
I not had too much trouble with USPS but I dont use them much either
Wisdom. Use EV’s where practical, like other carriers do. But at least start the process going.USPS was raided of its revenues by Congress, which required it to keep funds to pay retirements 75 years into the future. In other words, for employees that aren’t even born yet! That law was repealed only a few weeks ago, thank God. USPS operates on its own revenue only, and has access to NONE of your tax money. The USPS had to make some tough decisions due to that retirement fund law — not always good decisions, such as centralizing mail sorting functions away from local POs. As a result, if I send mail to a close neighbor down the road, it has to go to Albuquerque NM to be sorted and sent back to our local PO for delivery — a 500 mile round trip to get mail sent to an address a few hundred feet away. Hopefully, such gross inefficiencies will be corrected soon.
As far as the EV vs gasoline mail truck issue is concerned, USPS should be required to do a study of availability of electric power (and gasoline) in all of its locations, and make its decision based thereon.
I hope they do it. It'll make me lots of more money. However good an idea sounds, it would make sense to look at all the angles.
165,000 EVs will require the equivalent of 12 average nuclear power plants to charge. Of course they all won't charge at once or in the same neighborhood but, the average post office with say 50 vehicles will need 360kWhs to charge the fleet...daily. The increase demand on the national power grid would not go unnoticed. An additional unintended consequence will be soaring electricity prices, most of which is created with fossil fuels. Therefore, the price of fossil fuels will rise, too.
Because of their duty cycles (far more usage than average civilian vehicle) they will likely "wear out" their batteries in under three years, requiring new batteries and the disposal or reuse of approximately 25,000 tons of toxic waste (that is exactly how used EV batteries are referred to) every three years (estimating 300lbs of batteries per vehicle). That's $25 million for disposal of said batteries (at today's prices) and $2.1B (best case) in battery replacements every three years or so. I also very much doubt that US EV recycling capacity would be able to handle this volume of batteries in the near future. EV recycling is very inefficient and expensive.
Add to that the fact that there is not enough lithium in the world to satisfy our demand for it. Don't believe me? How about this guy:
![]()
Musk Is Right - Not Enough Lithium for EV Batteries!
Elon Musk tweeted...Lithium prices are up more than 80% this year and nickel prices have gyrated heavily amid trading turmoil in London.www.independentsentinel.com
If we electrify all 166 million registered cars in the USA, that would draw the equivalent of 12,000 average nuke plants. We currently have 86 operational nuke plants in the USA with 2 additional plants under construction. I think that we will be a little light on the power generation side of the equation.
I'm not anti-EV, quite the opposite (my financial wellbeing is directly correlated with EV adoption). However, they are not all that they are cracked up to be and every action causes a reaction. The law of unintended consequences is going to bite us ALL very hard when people start to figure this all out and by then, it'll be too late.
Li-ion recycling tech needs another 10 years to develop the tech to recover a far greater portion of the key materials.Finally someone gets it! I've been in the communications industry my entire life. I have always tried to bring these battery issues up and no one seems to understand!
Hydrogen is a better alternative, but the electric car ship has sailed and there are too many people on board who don't want to soil their reputations for backing a flawed plan!
So if they get no tax money why should they be required to do any studies before they purchase vehicles?USPS was raided of its revenues by Congress, which required it to keep funds to pay retirements 75 years into the future. In other words, for employees that aren’t even born yet! That law was repealed only a few weeks ago, thank God. USPS operates on its own revenue only, and has access to NONE of your tax money. The USPS had to make some tough decisions due to that retirement fund law — not always good decisions, such as centralizing mail sorting functions away from local POs. As a result, if I send mail to a close neighbor down the road, it has to go to Albuquerque NM to be sorted and sent back to our local PO for delivery — a 500 mile round trip to get mail sent to an address a few hundred feet away. Hopefully, such gross inefficiencies will be corrected soon.
As far as the EV vs gasoline mail truck issue is concerned, USPS should be required to do a study of availability of electric power (and gasoline) in all of its locations, and make its decision based thereon.
It is more the burping than the poots.
Disagreements will always arise, and we have to have a method to resolve them. We really don't want trial by combat.People shouldn't sue each other and stuff. But IDK.
The Constitution gives Congress the power "to establish Post Offices and post Roads" but it does not require it to do so.The USPS is a Constitutional required function of the Federal government.
Disagreements will always arise, and we have to have a method to resolve them. We really don't want trial by combat.
I mailed a flat rate box the other day, and the clerk started putting dozens of stamps all over the box. He explained that unpopular stamps have to be sent back to be shredded. He also stated it requires an absurd amount of paperwork and ties up a lot of time.
I admired his efforts to save tax dollars, but it does make me wonder just how much money is wasted annually for stamp printing, shipping, returning and destruction.
I don't mind paying taxes, but I absolutely despise the fact the government is such a poor steward with our tax dollars. Of course, that doesn't count whenever I'm hanging out at the coffee pot at the firehall.