- Mar 23, 2009
- Reaction score
Take a lot of what they say with a pinch of salt though. I read it, but they rarely check their facts or even spell check stuff. Its all sensationalist headlines and adverts. What they lack in quality they certainly make up for in quantity though.The Daily Mail covers international stories that we do not see anywhere else.
was this reported when she was 9? Or did she wait until she was 49?That's horrible if it's true. It's equally horrible if it's not. If it is true, you have to wonder why he was sexual at 9 years old? A 9 year old doesn't come up with that sort of behavior on their own...
My understanding: she discussed it with her parents when she was older, they rejected the notion. She's been ratcheting up a tirade among family and friends ever since, eventually going public. She also appears to have constructed a cottage industry among survivor and outrage circles. AFAIK the timeline was well into adulthood. Can't say if that corresponds with the rise of his success...was this reported when she was 9? Or did she wait until she was 49?
(Not taking the piss; I’m genuinely not sure)
Dammit, man...Alleged means alleged. I'm always a mite skeptical about lawsuits alleging "Famous Rich Person did something awful to me decades ago and I'm only bringing it up now."