Tailpiece adjustment question

[Boudin]

Hi guys,

I have a new 2016 standard-t with a buzzy low E. I like the neck where it is, I like the action where it is. The low E string is super slinky (unusually so) and I'm wondering if my fix may be as simple as turning down the bass side of the tailpiece a tad to put a little more tension on that string. It's not a terrible buzz, and I don't think it will take a whole lot to clear it up. My first inclination was to back the bridge out a bit, but then the loosey-goosey E got me to thinking that maybe I should turn down the TP.

If I can't clear it up by a turn or two of the screws, I'll take it in to a pro, but it seems like something I should be able to dial out. Just don't want to jack up my intonation or anything. I don't have to wade out too far to get over my head... lol. Any advice would be appreciated.

Strings are XL 9-42

 

[Skyjerk]

increasing tension will raise the pitch, then when you tune everything back to the correct pitch it'll be the same as it was before. Increasing tension isnt the answer.

If the low E is buzzing and the action isnt too low you could have a high fret, or a nut slot cut too deep.

Maybe also try a heavier gauge string if the low E seems unusually slinky.

the low E needs more clearance over the frets than the thinner strings

 

[kakerlak]

Skyjerk is right, unless the tailpiece is so high that there's close to zero break angle behind the bridge. If there's very little downward force being exerted by the string on its saddle, it can tend to vibrate in its slot and/or behind the bridge. Easiest way to tell is to put a little fingertip pressure on the string behind the bridge and see if the noise goes away (not a pitch-bending level of pressure, just enough to mute the string behind the bridge and press it down into its saddle a little harder). That having been said, I kind of doubt this is what's going on, unless the tailpiece is really high and/or top-wrapped with a low bridge.

Also, be sure to slack the strings before adjusting that tailpiece, or you'll chew up the heads on the studs. Also, a nickel is a friendlier tool than a screwdriver most of the time.

 

[emoney]

Have you always used 9-42s? I'm only asking because it could be a gauge issue if this is
a first foray. The other question I'd ask, and I know it sounds too simple but you never
know, is this your first LP and were you a F-type before? Scale length is what I'm really
asking, it makes the strings feel "different".

 

[Boudin]

I think emoney was on the money. I knew this guitar had 9s on it, but I went and looked at the factory specs and they were 9-46 NOT 9-42. I bet if I replace the low E with a 46 all will be right with the world. This is my first Gibson, so I'll blame it on that.... I'll report back the results. Thanks for the advice guys.