TKOjams
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2009
- Messages
- 10,060
- Reaction score
- 6,830
The Supreme Court rule that strip searches in jail are constitutional, even for minor criminal offenses. In the decision, which came on April 2, the Supreme Court ruled that safety trumps privacy, since the corrections officers usually do not have the records of every inmate during the intake process. This case was brought by Albert Florence, a man from New Jersey, who was forced to strip search after being arrested for a warrant, due to nonpayment of a fine. In New Jersey, it is not a crime to not pay your fines, so the warrant was essentially for something he should never have been arrested for. As a citizen concerned about the sanctity of the Constitution and diminishing privacy rights, here is why this decision is completely out of line.