Straight from Tim Shaw's mouth...

eslover

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
244
Reaction score
164
I called Fender customer service and spoke to Steve there who said
he'd forward the following message to Tim Shaw:

Dear Steve,

I am writing you with a rather strange request.

This request deals with helping me identify pick-ups - the so-called
Shaw PAF reissues developed by Tim Shaw for the Gibson Company
- which were used in certain Gibson models from about 1980 through
about 1987.

I was told that Tim Shaw may now be employed with Gretsch in Nashville.
If this is the same Tim Shaw, then I hope you can forward the following request to him:

Can he or someone he knows forward me any/all the information they know
about these pick-ups?

Specifically, what do the black-inked codes stamped into the pick-up
plate mean?

I believe the last three- (or four-) digits are a date stamp MYY, but I
have no clue at all what the first three-digits mean. I have noticed the
following:

if the first three-digits represents an odd number, then it is a neck pickup;
if it represents an even number, then it is a bridge pickup.

But other than this, I'm confused.

It also appears that only certain first three-digits combinations were used;
for example, 137/138, 373/372, my 1984 Custom Shop ES-335 DOT has
the combination 379/372 (I believe).

Also, after some time (I think in 1984) the black-ink stamp no longer
appeared on Shaw PAFs adding further mystique to exactly what the codes are.

I would deeply appreciate any clarification that can be provided.

Here was Tim Shaw's reply:

"This is pretty easy, really. At that time, the part numbers for pickups all began with “13”, so a Les Paul fingerboard pickup, in this particular series, was a 13137 and the bridge pickup was a 13138. Usually, but not always, they were consecutive numbers, and usually, but again not always, the fingerboard pickup was the lower of the two numbers, and again usually, but not always, the lower number was odd.

Your correspondent is right in deducing that the last three numbers are month and year.


I’m sorry that you guys get stuck answering questions about something that Gibson did in 1982. The sad thing is that nobody in their Customer Service remembers this, and I only do because I was there. They still have a few engineers from that period, but apparently the left hand can’t talk to the right hand!"

Tim


So the mystery is revealed?
 

SKATTERBRANE

Banned
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
21,430
Reaction score
12,405
So why would Shaw pickup have so many different part numbers? Here are the codes I have noted to be Shaw pickups:

401/402
489/490
329/330
137/138
372/373
498/499
392/393
898/899

Why so many different part numbers for the same pickup?
 

SKATTERBRANE

Banned
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
21,430
Reaction score
12,405
He is right about Gibson, they do not even remember what went on a few years ago, let alone all that has happened since the mid 80s. They are still struggling with making an accurate replica!
 

eslover

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
244
Reaction score
164
I agree this is somewhat unsettling, as for most of the issues
I raised in the initial email went unaddressed.

Would you mind if I send your info off to Shaw in an email, or better yet
I can give you Steve's email at Fender and he'll forward your question.
 

DelawareGold

_______Artie_______
Super Mod
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
6,517
Reaction score
13,275
Thanks, eslover.
I appreciate you sharing this information.


:thumb:
 

eslover

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
244
Reaction score
164
Your all welcome.

Hey, I just thought of this:
How about I get the names of those "old time" engineers at Gibson
from Tim Shaw and ask Gibson customer service to help...Do you think
they would?
 

Blind Jasper

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
135
Reaction score
16
Thanks for the research, this site is great. I am buying my first Les Paul custom this weekend. Its an 81 with the ink stamp 392. Thanks to everyone on this board for helping me become a better educated shopper.
 

cryptozoo

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
91
Based on what I've researched before, I would never buy a Shaw pickup for 'Shaw money' that wasn't a 137 / 138 designation. Based on what Tim just told you, you shouldn't either!
 

SKATTERBRANE

Banned
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
21,430
Reaction score
12,405
Based on what I've researched before, I would never buy a Shaw pickup for 'Shaw money' that wasn't a 137 / 138 designation. Based on what Tim just told you, you shouldn't either!

The 137/138s were the original Shaws found in Heritage Standard 80s and Elites. Now, I wonder how many 80s Les Pauls you have owned? I get my ink code data from Les Pauls I have owned. Various 80s preissues, and preHistorics, Standard 82s, Spotlight Specials, 30th anniversary GTs (1982-1983) and if you limit yourself to only 137/138 you will be passing by MANY Shaws. Now there were pickups OTHER than Shaws with ink codes too. I have seen Velvet Bricks and Dirty Finger with different codes, but I have not been keeping track of them.

And after 1984 (as far as I know) till the end, 1987, Shaws did NOT have ink codes at all. But it is VERY easy to mistake an 80s Standard P490 for a Shaw too.

Even Studio Standards, Studio Customs and CS and reissue ES-335s had Shaws, and a few Standards had them. And MOST 1980-1987 Customs had them.
 

nwobhm

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
3,242
Reaction score
362
I personally wouldn't pay the going rate for them but, I did manage to pickup a set of 137/138 1080 for 150.00 bucks on ebay today.:thumb:
 

Blind Jasper

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
135
Reaction score
16
I'm paying a very decent price for an 81 custom in great shape. If the 392 stamp means their Shaws then great. I have an 84 Studio Standard that has 372/373 which I always took for Shaws. If the new ones sound that good I'll definitely be happy.

Tim did say "in this particular series". Is it possible he's refering to one specific run of pickups? Maybe I'm just reaching. Either way I'm excited for my first Custom.
 

Zhangliqun

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
1,602
Reaction score
768
I'm digging your avatar, Nwobhm. Gotta get me one of those...
 

tazzboy

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
21,176
Reaction score
14,266
I called Fender customer service and spoke to Steve there who said
he'd forward the following message to Tim Shaw:

Dear Steve,

I am writing you with a rather strange request.

This request deals with helping me identify pick-ups - the so-called
Shaw PAF reissues developed by Tim Shaw for the Gibson Company
- which were used in certain Gibson models from about 1980 through
about 1987.

I was told that Tim Shaw may now be employed with Gretsch in Nashville.
If this is the same Tim Shaw, then I hope you can forward the following request to him:

Can he or someone he knows forward me any/all the information they know
about these pick-ups?

Specifically, what do the black-inked codes stamped into the pick-up
plate mean?

I believe the last three- (or four-) digits are a date stamp MYY, but I
have no clue at all what the first three-digits mean. I have noticed the
following:

if the first three-digits represents an odd number, then it is a neck pickup;
if it represents an even number, then it is a bridge pickup.

But other than this, I'm confused.

It also appears that only certain first three-digits combinations were used;
for example, 137/138, 373/372, my 1984 Custom Shop ES-335 DOT has
the combination 379/372 (I believe).

Also, after some time (I think in 1984) the black-ink stamp no longer
appeared on Shaw PAFs adding further mystique to exactly what the codes are.

I would deeply appreciate any clarification that can be provided.

Here was Tim Shaw's reply:

"This is pretty easy, really. At that time, the part numbers for pickups all began with “13”, so a Les Paul fingerboard pickup, in this particular series, was a 13137 and the bridge pickup was a 13138. Usually, but not always, they were consecutive numbers, and usually, but again not always, the fingerboard pickup was the lower of the two numbers, and again usually, but not always, the lower number was odd.

Your correspondent is right in deducing that the last three numbers are month and year.


I’m sorry that you guys get stuck answering questions about something that Gibson did in 1982. The sad thing is that nobody in their Customer Service remembers this, and I only do because I was there. They still have a few engineers from that period, but apparently the left hand can’t talk to the right hand!"

Tim


So the mystery is revealed?

Hi I am new here

I was told that first three number were just batch numbers. Also I was wondering there was interview done about him using Alnico 2 as well as Alnico 5 magnets I was wondering which guitars had the Alnico 2 magnets in them?
 

scozz

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
4,658
Reaction score
6,154
Man this "what number codes are Tim Shaw pickups" thing is really ambiguous. I've done a fair amount of research for on this for my own information with no real definitive answers. I've read all kinds of conflicting opinions on what number codes are Tim Shaw pickups and what ones are not.

Thanks to eslover, we have confirmed without a doubt that 137 and 138 are Shaws, (Mr Shaw said it himself) but what other number codes are also Shaws.

I have a 1982 Custom, that i bought new in 82. The number codes on the pickups are; 392/482 on the neck, and 392/483 on the bridge. I have been told that they ARE Shaws, and I have been told that they ARE NOT. It really doesn't matter much if they are or not, I would just like to know. :cool:

Can any of my fellow guitarist here help me out? :D

Thanks.
 

tazzboy

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
21,176
Reaction score
14,266
Do you have any pictures of these just help confirm things.

I'm not doubting you I just want to see it for myself.

Judging by the numbers it looks like you one set was made in April of 82 and the other was made in April of 83.
 

wootbetogod

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
I have an '84 Studio Standard with ink prints on them.

372 384 and 373 384

Just fyi in case anyone is curious about '84 Studio Standards.
 

Latest Threads



Top