Should I get a unburst 60s standard or a classic in honeyburst?

[Plant man]

I love the way Jimmy Page’s guitar looks. I realize it was originally heritage cherry sunburst, but it faded to this honeyburst looking color. I am wondering if a unburst or honeyburst is what I’m after? Thanks

 

[ErictheRed]

I would decide between the specs of the Standard or Classic and go from there (and choose the Standard).

 

[1allspub]

Needs a poll!

I prefer red backs, so I’d go with the Unburst Standard personally. I also don’t care for push-pull pots... so again, Standard. YMMV

 

[Plant man]

Needs a poll!

I prefer red backs, so I’d go with the Unburst Standard personally. I also don’t care for push-pull pots... so again, Standard. YMMV

I made it a poll! Go vote

 

[01GT Eibach]

All things being equal, I say get the Standard. That being said, Classics are fantastic.

 

[Renegade]

I voted for the Standard.

 

[redcoats1976]

i think thats a tough choice.it would depend on the individual guitars weight,and appearance/playability would figure in also.

 

[ErictheRed]

It will definitely depend on the individual guitar, but generally I like Standards a lot more than Classics for whatever reason. They just feel, sound, and play better to me.

 

[zube]

I was faced with the same dilemma last year. I ended up buying a Honeyburst Classic. From a looks perspective I'm in the minority that prefers plain tops and natural backs. Aside from looks I would go with the best feeling, playing, and sounding guitar regardless of if it's a Classic or Standard.

 

[searswashere]

Standard for me - classic necks and me dont mix.

 

[rjwilson37]

I think that this Wildwood one looks very close to what Jimmy was playing.

Les Paul Classic | Gibson Les Paul Classic, Modern Collection | Wildwood Guitars

Gibson Modern Collection Les Paul Classic .83-.93/9.48 lbs. Honeyburst

wildwoodguitars.com

 

[rjwilson37]

I love the way Jimmy Page’s guitar looks. I realize it was originally heritage cherry sunburst, but it faded to this honeyburst looking color. I am wondering if a unburst or honeyburst is what I’m after? Thanks

I think this Honeybust in my above post from Wildwood looks kind of like it.

 

[rjwilson37]

Standard for me - classic necks and me dont mix.

The new Classic necks are just a tad smaller than the Standard 60's neck, not as Super Slim like they were in the past with a Slim Taper 60's neck on the very slim side.

 

[uncajoey]

Get a circa 2001 Classic in Honeyburst for several reasons. You’ll pay less than a recent one, the Honeyburst color is way better on vintage Classics, and the wood grain is much better, Gibson was sourcing some amazing plain maple back then. The thin headstock shape and Kluson style tuners are also more aesthetically pleasing IMO.

I know, everyone will flame me for suggesting you buy a vintage Classic with “snot” inlays and ceramic pickups, but hey, you’re gonna change out the pickups anyway (everyone on this forum does), and the snot is not a big deal.

HAPPY HUNTING!

 

[dro]

Not everyone. If a guitar doesn't have the sound I want from the factory, I don't want it. Regardless of what it looks like.
I like the lower output pickups. Let's me hear more of the guitar.
Had some high output stuff back in the 80's when all the amp companies were pushing SS amps.
I'm a 60's, 70's, kind of guy. Want my drive from the amp, not the guitar.
Between the two you suggested, I'd lean towards the Standard. As I don't like coil splitters.
Depending on the type of music you like to make, I may or may not be the right guy to ask.

 

[Brek]

Needs a poll!

I prefer red backs, so I’d go with the Unburst Standard personally. I also don’t care for push-pull pots... so again, Standard. YMMV

with rats ass as a voting option. oh and zero fucks for steveC

 

[Brek]

Get a circa 2001 Classic in Honeyburst for several reasons. You’ll pay less than a recent one, the Honeyburst color is way better on vintage Classics, and the wood grain is much better, Gibson was sourcing some amazing plain maple back then. The thin headstock shape and Kluson style tuners are also more aesthetically pleasing IMO.

I know, everyone will flame me for suggesting you buy a vintage Classic with “snot” inlays and ceramic pickups, but hey, you’re gonna change out the pickups anyway (everyone on this forum does), and the snot is not a big deal.

HAPPY HUNTING!

I had two classics from the early noughties one HCB and one in honeyburst - they really were stellar guitars.

 

[moreles]

Go with the neck shape that works best for you. Guitars are for playing, not adoring.

 

[Lwilliams]

For me, the Standard is the only choice. Reason: NOT weight relieved.

There is a very noticeable tone difference with the "9-hole weight relief" body of the Classic.

And, if you shop around, you will find sub-9 pound Standards. Mine is 8 lbs, 13 oz.

I prefer the vintage style wiring wtih Orange Drop caps of the Standard.

The neck shape is not really that much different.

The nickel covers on the pickups is a part of the iconic look of the LP.

So, again, the Standard really is the standard.

 

[corona powers]

Get a circa 2001 Classic in Honeyburst for several reasons. You’ll pay less than a recent one, the Honeyburst color is way better on vintage Classics, and the wood grain is much better, Gibson was sourcing some amazing plain maple back then. The thin headstock shape and Kluson style tuners are also more aesthetically pleasing IMO.

I know, everyone will flame me for suggesting you buy a vintage Classic with “snot” inlays and ceramic pickups, but hey, you’re gonna change out the pickups anyway (everyone on this forum does), and the snot is not a big deal.

HAPPY HUNTING!

Snot inlay’s don’t bother me but I do get sick of seeing flames everywhere.
I’m even sick of my own flames.