Reinventing the tone control

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
I literally reinvented it because what I came up with I later found is called the Grease Bucket circuit from Fender :)

But anyway, this is the most usable tone control I have had up to now.

One of the problems with a standard tone control is that as you bring down the treble the cutoff frequency also shifts to the bass side obliterating your mids. You can use a lower value cap, but that doesn't do much in the 0 to 5 range of the tone control and the cutoff is a little high until you go below 5.

The solution is to use the other side of the tone pot (the unused post) to slowly add in another cap in series (twice the value of the other one works best) as you turn down the tone control. This decreses the total capcitance as the tone is turned down keeping the cutoff frequency above the midrange (for the most part). I'm using a .01 and adding in a .022 as I turn down.
This sounds great!

In addition to that i'm using two different types of caps. I have some Jupiter caps that sound really smooth but loose any crispness/harmonics below 5 on the control. My vitamin Qs sound best to me in that 5 to 0 range. So i'm using them both. It really is the best of both worlds.

I encourage anyone who has some spare caps lying around to try this.
I will post a diagram when I get a chance, but here is how it's wired. Looking at the bottom of the pot with the lugs pointing down, the left lug being lug 1 and the right one being lug 3.
Lug 1 connects to the signal (pre or post volume)
Lug 2 connects to a .022 Vitamin Q cap to Lug1
Lug 3 connects to a .01 Jupiter to ground (or pot case)

Thats it.

-Eddie
 

sapi

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
898
Reaction score
75
LOL i tried the Fender Greasebucket Tone Control on my LP and Fender. I used Hovland caps. It worked fine. Then i tried stock wiring a Black Beauty .022uF in the LP and a .047uF in the Fender, and preferred these.
Best,
jo
 

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
Here is a diagram. Pretty simple really:

tonemod.gif


At 10 the .022µF cap is out of the circuit.
BTW, I really didn't like Hovlands at all for tone caps. I'm sure they are great coupling capacitors, but not for guitar tone caps.
 

sapi

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
898
Reaction score
75
Mmm, to each his own i guess, there are some who swear by Hovland Musicaps in guitars. I see that you used a linear tone pot, mine was log.
Thanks for the info. Maybe one day i'll try it again with PIO caps.
Best,
jo

EDIT: doesn't the Fender GTC use a 0.1uF as opposed to a 0.01uF cap?
 

xsouldriverx

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
4,181
Reaction score
141
i use hovlands and like them so far. but for my next guitar im going to try some .10/.15 vit Qs or jensens
 

rick13

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
748
Reaction score
102
How would this be adapted to the "classic" wiring scheme?
Thanks,
Rick
 

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
It really just depends on where you connect your normal tone control. Before the volume knob (Modern) or after the volume knob (1950's style).
I was playing around with values a bit. For some reason the neck sounds best with two .022µF and the bridge sounds best with the configuration above.
I'm still playing around with it, so tomorrow I might change my mind.
 

rick13

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
748
Reaction score
102
Did you see the diagram in the wiring library" A different take on the high pass filter"?
Rick
 

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
Thats interesting. It's a totally different circuit that does something different, but it's interesting. His basic premise appears wrong however. He says the volume knob cuts the lows as your turn down the volume which is incorrect. It actually cuts highs (without a treble bleed). If it's cutting the lows and you have a treble bleed, then your using the wrong values in your treble bleed circuit. In the end I think he is just fixing a problem he created by using the wrong bleed values in the first place.
 

ozone

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
1,052
Reaction score
63
Hey Eddie, could you post a pic of your wiring. I like the diagram but I think a picture would be good. Thanks
 

sapi

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
898
Reaction score
75
Hi Eddie, you found better results with a linear pot vs log? Cheers ;-)
 

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
I didn't try log. I used what I had on hand :)
I just wanted to note what I used. The results should be the same, just a different taper.

-Eddie
 

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
OK here is an actualy photo. It's going to be more confusing than the schematic because there are also treble bleeds and my 3 pickup switch which keeps the bridge tone control out of the circuit in the middle position.

lp_newtone_sm.jpg


I can throw up the whole schematic if anyone is interested.
 

rick13

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
748
Reaction score
102
What value resistor on the treble bleed?250K in parallel?
Thanks,
Rick
 

eddie_bowers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
906
Reaction score
220
I'm using one meg volume pots, so the value is going to be non-standard. its stll a little high. I havent hit on the right value with my one meg pots yet.
 

Latest Threads



Top