Back in 2008 I bought a partscaster by a guy who finished it with a spray can of reranch Nitro and a relic job and sold them on ebay for cheap. I'm sure people can "fake" a Gibson look nitro too, for (relatively) cheap.But that doesn't explain the finish does indeed look to be nitro.....
If he was selling on ebay for cheap and finishing with Reranch, he wasn't making much money. Freaking rattle cans are an expensive way to refin, even just using hardware store paint.Back in 2008 I bought a partscaster by a guy who finished it with a spray can of reranch Nitro and a relic job and sold them on ebay for cheap. I'm sure people can "fake" a Gibson look nitro too, for (relatively) cheap.
When I say cheap- I meant $600 dollars in 2008- Around the same price as the top of the line MIM of the day but better quality materials- quality bodies, necks, parts- Fender USA/AV, Warmoth , Mighty Mite, etc.If he was selling on ebay for cheap and finishing with Reranch, he wasn't making much money. Freaking rattle cans are an expensive way to refin, even just using hardware store paint.
That is a hell of a good question!As fun as it is to ponder this guitar…. the big question is why would anyone want it, with all the other guitars in the world?
I have a 1978 Les Paul Custom with a dotted I..... I have owned it since 1980... get over the dot..... some have them.... some don’t.I have a Norlin 78 Custom. Comparing to mine, I say too many issues. Headstock looks wrong, dotted "i" in Gibson logo, no volute. I say pass.
Ya, this one certainly falls under "There's too many fish in the sea" to be worth it to take the chance.Though the OP’s guitar has a few issues I can’t say for certain it’s legit..... something is fishy about it.
It’s been refinished a number of times and it’s possible renecked or repaired.
Besides all the little details that are clearly wrong.... pup rings....bridge.. it still has a pointy cutaway horn like mine. I would simply avoid this guitar. Not worth it for any price.