Strings are only "old" when the wound strings start to develop wear against the frets. JMHO.
Otherwise, it is just a marketing ploy to guilt you into changing perfectly good strings.
Some strings last twice s long as others. They are worth the extra cost, also IMHO.
YMMV.
Now, if you have guitars sitting around unplayed long enough to oxidize, that is a different story. Or if you are a sweaty bastid.
Ultimately, whatever works for each individual is best.
Strings are only "old" when the wound strings start to develop wear against the frets. JMHO.
Otherwise, it is just a marketing ploy to guilt you into changing perfectly good strings.
I notice a flater less vibrant sound and also tuning issues with worn strings. But it varies with use and keeping the strings clean with Fret Fast after use goes a long way to extending the life of strings. Keep them in their cases also help.Can you hear a difference??
I have had a set of d'addario NYXL's on one of my guitars for over 2 years and I swear, they sound better with age. Not changing until I break a string.Yeah, on a couple guitars I change the strings when they sound "lifeless" this can happen after a month of playing. However my "main" guitar ( a Warmoth partscaster) sounds best with strings "broken in". My last set lasted 5 1/2 years of hard playing. Keep in mind they never broke I just wore through the winding on the d string at the 3rd fret. The previous set of d'addario XL lasted 4 years and had never broken either. I expect the 10 pack I bought in 1992 will outlast my playing.
Strings are only "old" when the wound strings start to develop wear against the frets. JMHO.
Otherwise, it is just a marketing ploy to guilt you into changing perfectly good strings.
Some strings last twice s long as others. They are worth the extra cost, also IMHO.
YMMV.
Now, if you have guitars sitting around unplayed long enough to oxidize, that is a different story. Or if you are a sweaty bastid.
Ultimately, whatever works for each individual is best.