- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 13,537
- Reaction score
- 42,018
In return I got some awesome guitars.You're becoming one hell of an income stream for old Lt.
In return I got some awesome guitars.You're becoming one hell of an income stream for old Lt.
Verrry interesting idea; please keep us informed about the progressions!I have been looking for one of these for a while,... but I decided to have @LtDave32 build me one instead... the twist here is instead of walnut or mahogany it’s going to be made of Korina.... one piece neck and a one piece body with some T-Top clones.
This will be Desert Star number 4 for me.
Yep, very cool and unique sounding guitars....had one in the mid-80's...traded it off for a Kramer....big mistake!Finally an affordable vintage ‘70s Les Paul.
From my understanding, this guitar has a Walnut body, Mahogany neck, and an Ebony fretboard. I believe that the guitar is all original with two T-Top Humbuckers.
On the way home, and in back seat of the car photo.
View attachment 620489
I like the dark spot. That’s rock n roll!Cleaned up 43 years of grime. Still some work to go and I need to put on a new set of .010’s.
Other than the dark area on the horn, the guitar is in really good condition. Sounds good, plays good, and stays in tune. Pretty happy with my purchase.
The T-Tops definitely get that ‘70s sound.
I need to decide what to do with the dark spot on the horn. In the last photo, I sat a black pick-guard on the guitar just to see how it would look.
View attachment 620878
View attachment 620551 View attachment 620552
This is exactly it. Sort of the Studio of its day. I don't like walnut, period, but it has become a perfectly acceptable guitar wood used by plenty of boutique makers, and Gibson showed forethought in trying to get it into the mainstream. That didn't happen (though the natural look did catch on somewhat) which made The Paul a flop. Too bad, in retrospect.The Paul was the way you could get into a Gibson at a reasonable price.
Well not exactly a flop....they made them well into the late '80s.... they sold every one they made.This is exactly it. Sort of the Studio of its day. I don't like walnut, period, but it has become a perfectly acceptable guitar wood used by plenty of boutique makers, and Gibson showed forethought in trying to get it into the mainstream. That didn't happen (though the natural look did catch on somewhat) which made The Paul a flop. Too bad, in retrospect.
Killer guitar. But I'm pretty sure the stock pickups were Dirty Fingers (both coils were screw coils). All the ones I saw or played when they were new had them.Finally an affordable vintage ‘70s Les Paul.
From my understanding, this guitar has a Walnut body, Mahogany neck, and an Ebony fretboard. I believe that the guitar is all original with two T-Top Humbuckers.
On the way home, and in back seat of the car photo.
View attachment 620489
the original was called "The Paul" in 1978-9....then there was the "The Paul Firebrand" with the wood burned branded Gibson Logo....1979-80.... Then there was the "The Paul Firebrand Deluxe".... 1981 the Deluxe had a nitro clear finish with the gold silkscreen Gibson Logo some had painted finishes. The first incarnation had the Dirty Fingers pickups.... the later models had T-Tops....the Deluxe had the Velvet Brick in the bridge (the highest output Gibson humbucker ever)...Dirty Fingers Tim Shaw designed pickup and the Velvet Brick was a Bill Lawrence pickup... prior to the PAF Tim Shaws. The pickup type changed without notice and with availability.If I understand the history correctly (and seemingly no one understands it all) there were several different versions of "The Paul", all good guitars but of varying desirablity and collectability. Some had the silk screen Gibson logo and some had the Gibson logo burned onto the headstock (called "Firebrand"). Some had T-tops (now frequently changed) and some did not (Dirty Fingers, others). Some all Walnut, some not. Values (but not necessarly tone or playabllity) is effected by these nuances. This is really more of a question than a statement. Anyone a "The Paul" expert that can fill in those gaps?
I had in my head that they were not ALL made of Walnut? True or False? and also that some of the later models were made of scavenged unused parts and were "all over the place" as far as details. Full disclosure I have heard the "unused parts" myth about many models but a few of them were actually true!the original was called "The Paul" in 1978-9....then there was the "The Paul Firebrand" with the wood burned branded Gibson Logo....1979-80.... Then there was the "The Paul Firebrand Deluxe".... 1981 the Deluxe had a nitro clear finish with the gold silkscreen Gibson Logo some had painted finishes. The first incarnation had the Dirty Fingers pickups.... the later models had T-Tops....the Deluxe had the Velvet Brick in the bridge (the highest output Gibson humbucker ever)...Dirty Fingers and Velvet Brick were Tim Shaw designed pickups.... prior to the PAF Tim Shaws. The pickup type changed without notice and with availability.
By 1982 the Harmonica bridge was used... Other than pickup changes and finish upgrades the guitar stayed the same.
View attachment 622361
This is true.... they were not all made of Walnut.... only the first incarnations of The Paul and The Paul Firebrand and those were still available in mahogany with a 3 piece mahogany neck if you wanted.I had in my head that they were not ALL made of Walnut? True or False? and also that some of the later models were made of scavenged unused parts and were "all over the place" as far as details. Full disclosure I have heard the "unused parts" myth about many models but a few of them were actually true!