New Federal Reserve's Chairpersons speech...

Status
Not open for further replies.

geochem1st

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
27,748
Reaction score
40,935
The Federal Reserve is not affiliated with any political party and was created to be apolitical. Please leave comments out regarding conspiracy theories as to it's creation and members.

I find the content to be pretty revealing and wonder why they would resort to such a stance, supported by data, given their position in the scheme of things. They don't require popular support.

***************************************************************


Citing U.S. values, Yellen says greatly concerned by rise in economic inequality


BOSTON, Oct 17 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said on Friday the growth of economic inequality in the United States "greatly" concerned her, and suggested in a detailed speech on the politically charged issue that Americans should ask whether it was compatible with their values.

With global financial markets rebounding from days of frenzied selling, Yellen did not comment on the volatility or on monetary policy. Instead she focused on the gulf between rich and poor that has only grown wider over the last several decades and, she said, through the U.S. economic recovery.

The data-heavy speech amounted to a broad social critique and treatise that supported government interventions to help boost Americans at the bottom of the economic ladder. It continued Yellen's focus as head of the U.S. central bank on the trials of the unemployed and underemployed, a concern that has delayed an interest-rate rise in the wake of the recession.

"The extent of and continuing increase in inequality in the United States greatly concern me," Yellen told a conference on the topic at the Boston branch of the central bank.

"It is no secret that the past few decades of widening inequality can be summed up as significant income and wealth gains for those at the very top and stagnant living standards for the majority," she told economists, professors and community workers.

"I think it is appropriate to ask whether this trend is compatible with values rooted in our nation's history, among them the high value Americans have traditionally placed on equality of opportunity."

Income disparity between the richest Americans and the rest has risen since the 2007-2009 recession. An extensive Fed study published last month suggests wealth and income is concentrated not just within the top 1 percent, as some analyses have suggested, but actually among a slightly broader slice of the ultra-rich: the top 3 percent.

From 2010 to 2013, all of the income growth was concentrated among the top earners with the top 3 percent of U.S. families accounting for some 30 percent of all income. The disparity was even greater by wealth, the study found, with the 3 percent holding 54.4 percent of all net worth in 2013.

NUDGING LAWMAKERS

Yellen, who has given major speeches on inequality for some two decades and on Thursday toured a hard-hit neighborhood of Boston, acknowledged that a rebound in house prices over the last two years has restored much wealth to those at the bottom.

But she cited several troubling contributors to a lack of equality of opportunity, including the expensive cost of higher education faced by the young. The slowdown in business formation may depress productivity and further threaten economic opportunity, she said.

Heading into unfamiliar territory for a Fed chair, Yellen compared school funding in the United States with that of other countries, including approaches to those in lower-income neighborhoods. She also analyzed the role large inheritances play in "the fairly limited intergenerational mobility."

By some estimates, she said, "income and wealth inequality are near their highest levels in the past hundred years, much higher than the average during that time span and probably higher than for much of American history before then."

Yellen, who did not take questions, said she aimed to provide a factual basis for further discussion and she sat in the audience to hear research on race and economic inequality.

"This seems like a pretty deep dive into some pretty specific policy issues," unusual terrain for a Fed chair, said Josh Bivens, research director for the Economic Policy Institute, a think tank that has focused on employment and inequality issues. "As a diagnosis there is a pretty convincing case for what we can do to increase economic mobility."

Yellen did not comment on the economic outlook after a sharp global stock market selloff that led investors to reappraise the Fed's likely policy path, and that led Fed officials to open a debate over their next steps.

The Fed has embraced extraordinary policies to boost employment and, from former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to Yellen, has not hesitated to express frustration at a lack of fiscal stimulus from Washington. Some Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, have criticized the Fed's easy-money policies for allowing Congress to put off cost cuts.

Among the issues the Fed has been debating is whether the country's long-term growth potential has declined, and whether there are things that could be done to increase it.

"It may be," said Bivens, "that even the bread and butter job of Fed chair is made harder by the rise of inequality and they are maybe trying to alert people to that."
UPDATE 2-Citing U.S. values, Yellen says greatly concerned by rise in economic inequality | Reuters

Actual speech and data:
FRB: Speech with Slideshow--Yellen, Perspectives on Inequality and Opportunity from the Survey of Consumer Finances--October 17, 2014

:shock:
 

Alex W

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
635
Reaction score
795
I find the content to be pretty revealing and wonder why they would resort to such a stance, supported by data, given their position in the scheme of things. They don't require popular support.

I don't quite follow the point you're making here.

Anyway, IMO the simple explanation is that the gulf between the very rich and the vast majority of Americans is now so great that the Fed felt that it warranted discussion.
 

HenryHill

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
16,239
Reaction score
40,406
The points in the article are exactly what I was hearing in regards to her initial nomination.

That she was confirmed speaks to a feeling by the other half of congress that Fed policy is wrong and dangerous, and does nothing for lower half of the income scale, perpetuating poor economic conditions for all, er, the other 99%.

I just can't believe she got this far, as the nominee for the Consumer protection Agency crashed and burned.

It will be interesting to see if policy can be changed to more fully support the greater good, and not just the nearly free money that has gone to Wall Street all these years, and at the expense of putting that money to use by Joe Main Street.

It is hard to not imagine that she is in real danger, too. :cool:
 

TheX

VIP wannabe
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2008
Messages
45,856
Reaction score
116,055
The Federal Reserve is not affiliated with any political party and was created to be apolitical. Please leave comments out regarding conspiracy theories as to it's creation and members.

Every single person associated with any agency has an affiliation.
 

Mark C

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
5,187
Here is my contribution to the thread:

it's = it is

its = possessive

Carry on with THE Friday thread in the making.
 

geochem1st

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
27,748
Reaction score
40,935
I don't quite follow the point you're making here.

Anyway, IMO the simple explanation is that the gulf between the very rich and the vast majority of Americans is now so great that the Fed felt that it warranted discussion.

In many ways Fed monetary policy has led to the large divide we have. That they are now opening up discussion about it is very different. They aren't very open about much.
 

Deus Vult

Banned
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Messages
18,966
Reaction score
33,895
does this mean they're gonna break me off a piece of the $85 billion they're pumping into Wall St every month?
 

HenryHill

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
16,239
Reaction score
40,406
The previous guys in charge seemed to feel it was their sole job to ladle however much cheap money they could to Wall Street as though that did the country any good whatsoever, and Summers and Geithner were up to their eyeballs in looking out only for Wall Street, even though they knew full well what their policy did.
 

PeteK

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
23,329
Reaction score
69,710
So you started a thread about the Federal Reserve, on a Friday, and we're not supposed to talk about the Fed conspiracies?

Good luck with that!
 

hecube

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
14,587
Reaction score
24,607
Let's talk about how the ebola virus infects liberals and conservatives and see if there's a trend instead
 

winexprt

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,397
Reaction score
3,152
A little primer on the Fed for the layperson:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0]The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind - Hidden Secrets of Money 4 | Mike Maloney - YouTube[/ame]
 

Blackie

Banned
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
12,805
Reaction score
37,719
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w211KOQ5BMI]Rage Against The Machine - Sleep Now In The Fire - YouTube[/ame]
 

LPSGME

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
3,251
These people are so clueless that they don't realize it is their policies that have helped to create that gap.
 

Kamen_Kaiju

smiling politely as they dream of savage things
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
87,611
Reaction score
270,067
End the fvcking fed.

Don't be so testie. In a pinch these folks could provide tips to help circumvent pressing issues before things go wrong and are cut off.

:cool:
:naughty:
:laugh2:


(hope you're feeling better man. :) )
 

YoshiJimbo

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Messages
2,738
Reaction score
2,538
The previous guys in charge seemed to feel it was their sole job to ladle however much cheap money they could to Wall Street as though that did the country any good whatsoever, and Summers and Geithner were up to their eyeballs in looking out only for Wall Street, even though they knew full well what their policy did.

I don't follow these things much, but it seems like I remember seeing the previous fellow on tv and that he had been there quite awhile, even before the current admin? Berneke?
 

TheX

VIP wannabe
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2008
Messages
45,856
Reaction score
116,055
I have to thank them for my sub 3%, 15 year fixed home loan.
 

Brazilnut

Silver Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
5,366
Reaction score
11,831
In one way, it is heartening to see this very scary problem being addressed by the head of the Federal Reserve. On the other hand, were the problem not so severe, it would not have been remarked. Economic inequality of so profound a nature WILL weaken and eventually destroy this country. And I'm not kidding. Oligarchies inevitably fail, starting with the Italian city states. History is not kind to unmitigated greed, especially when it becomes the government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Threads



Top