The problem even with that... In typical Hollywood fashion, the movie would not be a spy who just happens to be gay.IMHO, James Bond is a character from a book. He was not gay, he was a single white male and a womanizer. Sean Connery set the tone for the James Bond character in movies.
If you want a gay, trans or female spy that's a different story. It could be a great story and a great character. But trying to use the Bond name to write that story, is cheap and pathetic.
So you;d be good with Melissa?I don't know, but I'm open minded with the casting choices, as long as it's not some waify 90 pound chick who can magically knock out 300 pound dudes with one punch. It can be done right. But anymore, I don't really trust Hollywood to do anything right.
I unironically enjoyed the spy movie she did a few years ago with Jude Law. But no.So you;d be good with Melissa?
I read one when i was under 10 years old, I think it was From Russia with love, my dad freaked when he realised what I was reading. He forbade me reading anymore of them.I’ve never read the books and I wonder how many people here have.
Even in a MLP thread about the social markup of a character casting, I wonder who’s actually read them.
I’m not even interested in them. I just like movies and prefer when they’re good.
Would!i can honestly say that i would fully support Zazie Beetz reprising her role as Domino, who becomes the next "007".
it actually makes a lot of sense.
Domino = 007
we should all be so lucky...
sure i'm kidding, but it would probably be better than anything hollyweird comes up with.
to getting lucky!