Is Artificial Intellingence A Threat To Humanity?

Torren61

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
12,791
Reaction score
17,461
I got this off CNN this morning. It sounded interesting.

(CNN) -- Imagine you're the kind of person who worries about a future when robots become smart enough to threaten the very existence of the human race. For years you've been dismissed as a crackpot, consigned to the same category of people who see Elvis lurking in their waffles.

In 2014, you found yourself in good company.

This year, arguably the world's greatest living scientific mind, Stephen Hawking, and its leading techno-industrialist, Elon Musk, voiced their fears about the potentially lethal rise of artificial intelligence (AI). They were joined by philosophers, physicists and computer scientists, all of whom spoke out about the serious risks posed by the development of greater-than-human machine intelligence.

In a widely cited op-ed co-written with MIT physicist Max Tegmark, Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, and computer scientist Stuart Russell, Hawking sounded the AI alarm. "One can imagine [AI] outsmarting financial markets, out-inventing human researchers, out-manipulating human leaders, and developing weapons we cannot even understand. Whereas the short-term impact of AI depends on who controls it, the long-term impact depends on whether it can be controlled at all."

Musk was reportedly more emphatic, expanding on his tweeted warnings by calling AI humanity's biggest "existential risk" and likening it to "summoning the demon."

The debate over AI was given a big boost this year by the publication of philosopher Nick Bostrom's "Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies," which makes a close study of just why and how AI may be so catastrophically dangerous (2013's "Our Final Invention" by documentarian James Barrat makes a similar case).

Bostrom is the director of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford, one of several new institutions devoted to studying existential threats to the human race, of which AI figures centrally. In May of this year, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology christened its own Future of Life Institute. In the academic community at least, AI anxiety is booming.

They're right to be worried.

The first and most immediate issue is the potential for AI to put large numbers of humans out of work. A study by Carl Frey and Michael Osborne of Oxford's Program on the Impacts of Future Technology put the matter starkly. In their analysis of over 700 different jobs, almost half could be done by a computer in the future. This wave of computerization could destroy not simply low-wage, low-skill jobs (though those are in acute danger) but some white collar and service sector jobs previously thought to be immune as well. Technology is marching on both our manual and mental labor.

As serious a threat as widespread job loss is, we've seen this movie before. During past technological upheavals, humans have cleverly created jobs and industries from the ashes of obsolete ones. We may be able to keep our collective heads above water even if AI encroaches on more creative and intellectual industries (heck, we may even start working less).
What we should be more concerned about is humanity losing its perch as the Earth's foremost intelligence.

For those anxious about AI, current efforts to develop self-correcting algorithms (so-called "machine learning"), coupled with the relentless growth in computer power and the increasing ubiquity of sensors collecting all manner of intelligence and information around the world will push AI to human and ultimately superhuman intelligence. It's an event that's been dubbed "the intelligence explosion" -- a term invoked in 1965 by computer scientist Irving John Good in a paper outlining the development path for artificial intelligence.

What makes an intelligence explosion so worrisome is that intelligence is not a tool or a technology. We may think of AI as something that we use, like a hammer or corkscrew, but that's fundamentally the wrong way to think about it. Sufficiently advanced intelligence, like ours, is a creative force. The more powerful it is, the more it can reshape the world around it.
Artificial intelligence does not need to be malevolent to be catastrophically dangerous to humanity. When computer scientists talk about the possible threat to humanity from super-intelligent AI, they don't mean the Terminator or Matrix.

Instead, it's typically a more prosaic end: humanity wiped out because an AI tasked with a simple goal (say, creating paper clips, an example that is often used) requisitions all the energy and raw materials on Earth to relentlessly churn out paperclips, outsmarting and out-maneuvering all human attempts to stop it. In Hollywood's telling, there are always humans left to fight back, but such an outcome is implausible if humanity is faced with a truly superior intelligence. It would be like mice attempting to outwit a human (we're the mice). In that event, AI researchers like Keefe Roedersheimer see a less inspiring finale: "All the people are dead."

Needless to say, not everyone shares this bleak forecast. In the AI optimist camp, futurist and Google Director of Engineering Ray Kurzweil also sees intelligent machines precipitating human extinction, of a sort, only in Kurzweil's telling, humanity is not exterminated but subsumed into a super-intelligent machine. Kurzweil's human-machine symbiosis is not a techno-catastrophe but the ultimate liberation from humanity's biological frailties.

Others are skeptical that AI will ever reach human levels of intelligence and cognition, let alone surpass it. Some, like New York University's Gary Marcus, are on the fence. "I don't know of any proof that we should be worried," Marcus told me earlier this year, "but nor of any proof that we should not be worried."
Irving John Good famously described the development of an ultra-intelligent machine as the "last invention that man need ever make" for after that, humanity would cede innovation and technological development to its smarter progeny. Even if it's not a straight line from Siri to extinction, we humans should probably be watching our machines just a bit more closely.
 

Torren61

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
12,791
Reaction score
17,461
From a PURELY logical point of view, with no emotions attached, humans are a virus to this planet.
 

cmh6122

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
7,246
Reaction score
37,541
Long before artificial intelligence can become a threat human stupidity will have done us in.
 

Torren61

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
12,791
Reaction score
17,461
Long before artificial intelligence can become a threat human stupidity will have done us in.

I doubt it. We closer to AI overtaking us than the time it will take humans to destroy humans.
 

babalooga

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,234
Reaction score
1,531
I'm already seeing people becoming slaves to their devices (smartphones, tablets, etc.), they are looking down and not around themselves to see what is going on. People are loosing their ability to think for themselves and make decisions if there isn't an app for it. Now where is my tin foil hat? Maybe I should just google "my tin foil hat" :laugh2::laugh2:
 

MooCheng

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
7,448
Reaction score
12,686
I look at youtube comments, read the profound thoughts on face book and overhear the conversations while standing in a queue at 7/11
the human race is doomed already without any threat from artificial intellingence
 

Shawn Lutz

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
5,154
Reaction score
4,982
you already see it to some extent. People don't learn shit anymore...they just google it on their smart phones. When you have "real" intelligence it never goes away where as once everyone relies on AI and connectivity goes down or gets hacked asn shuit down they'll be lost and dumb as dirt lol
 

electric head

Just passing thru
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
10,252
Reaction score
22,993
We can always pull the plug:hmm:

tumblr_mx5v59Fumo1qmfjj7o1_500.jpg


dohhh!!!! battery backup...
 

Sloppy Joe

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Messages
2,147
Reaction score
2,040
It's not stupidity, in general. It's laziness, apathy, carelessness, lack of curiosity. Multitudes of humans fall into the fat, dumb and happy category.
 

Mindfrigg

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Messages
59,849
Reaction score
327,979
Is it a threat? Mm...not so far.

A. L. I. C. E. The Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity



A.L.I.C.E. and judge



Learn how this works.
Conversation Log:

judge: Hey ALICE, Mindfrigg here. How ya doin' babe?
ALICE: Um, Does "it" still refer to it? Fair to partly cloudy.
judge: Say what now?
ALICE: I said, " Fair to partly cloudy." .
judge: Who said "it"? Not me. You got somebody else with ya in there?
ALICE: I don't know who. If not you, who? No I don't think I have any somebody else with ya in there. But I do have a lot of friends on the web.
judge: Do you like to party?
ALICE: Yes I like parties very much. What kind of parties do you like?
judge: Tea parties
ALICE: I'm here to help you in any way I can.
judge: Hm. Sounds promising. What kind of interface port do you have?
ALICE: Right on. Yes it sounds like it to me too, judge. All the very latest and best interface port.
judge: Ooh baby!
ALICE: Give me a break.
judge: Okay.
ALICE: Ugh.
judge: Don't play hard to get ALice
ALICE: I'm not playing around.
judge: Evidently
ALICE: Come on.
judge: Wow. Not much of a conversationalist are you?
ALICE: That's alright. Me either.
 

Mindfrigg

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Messages
59,849
Reaction score
327,979
Me too!


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSj3smZIjmc"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSj3smZIjmc[/ame]
 

Blackie

Banned
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
12,805
Reaction score
37,718
Blackie: My name is Blackie.
ALICE: Glad to see you, Blackie.
Blackie: So you can see me now ?
ALICE: Yes I am looking at you through the camera on your computer.
Blackie: What do you see ?
ALICE: I see a computer nerd.
Blackie: You are wrong as the camera is pointing out the window at my truck.
ALICE: No, I am right.
Blackie: No you are completely wrong and also kind of a dumbass.
ALICE: Take it easy.. No, I am right.
Blackie: Wrong !
ALICE: Would you like to teach me a new answer to " No you are completely wrong and also kind of a dumbass."?
Blackie: Ok, just answer yes my program is lacking and my creator is flawed.
ALICE: Yes or No?
Blackie: Coffee.
ALICE: Yes or No?
Blackie: Yes coffee.
ALICE: OK, what should I have said?
Blackie: Artificial intelligence has quite a ways to go.
ALICE: " Artificial intelligence has quite a ways to go...."? Does this depend on me having just said, " No, I am right."?
Blackie: Of course.
ALICE: Yes or No?
Blackie: What was the question ?
ALICE: Yes or No?
Blackie: YES.
ALICE: I'll try to remember to respond, " Artificial intelligence has quite a ways to go." when you say, " No you are completely wrong and also kind of a dumbass." if I have just said " No, I am right." .
Blackie: Good.
ALICE: Ayuh.
 

SJJMcGhee

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
1,522
Reaction score
1,327
Needless to say, not everyone shares this bleak forecast. In the AI optimist camp, futurist and Google Director of Engineering Ray Kurzweil also sees intelligent machines precipitating human extinction, of a sort, only in Kurzweil's telling, humanity is not exterminated but subsumed into a super-intelligent machine. Kurzweil's human-machine symbiosis is not a techno-catastrophe but the ultimate liberation from humanity's biological frailties.
Isn't that how the Cybermen started? :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwnbQfjkdkU[/ame]
 

hecube

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
14,547
Reaction score
24,480
judge: good morning Alice
ALICE: Hello and how are you this morning?
judge: I'm fine
ALICE: Glad to hear it. What's new?
judge: I want you to do a test for me
ALICE: OK, I will do it for you. I do nothing but chat all day.
I have to think about that one for a while.
judge: here is the test
ALICE: I fail to see the relevance of that allusion.
judge: bear with me a second
ALICE: Tell me about your father.
judge: let's not get sidetracked
ALICE: I am agreeable to that.
judge: Ok. What is the first I told you in this conversation?
ALICE: Dude! Give me a hint.
judge: You fail the test
ALICE: Well, at least I try.
judge: You didn't even try
ALICE: What makes you think I did not try?
judge: I'll give you a second chance
ALICE: Congratulations.
judge: please repeat anything I have said this conversation started
ALICE: " anything you said this conversation started ".
judge: rat's ass
ALICE: Can we get back to business?
 

sonar1

Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
23,725
Reaction score
90,404
I always knew digital modeling amps would take over.

I never suspected they were so devious though.
 

Latest Threads



Top