So today I decided to bring my Les Paul over to my school to play during my off hour (tis a block day, so it's really about two hours). While I was there I got criticism for owning a Gibson Les Paul. One of these people came by and made a snide remark about how when he was my age he didn't even own a guitar, and I understand that, but I saved up for a VERY long time to get my Studio and I told him that. Then he went on a rant about how with gibson you only pay for the name and told me i should've bought from epiphone or another brand that makes knock offs. I explained to him that I wanted a high quality les paul and that he should check out some of the epiphone ones that have crooked and off center knobs and a variety of finish defects (i'm not quite sure if this is true to all epiphone guitars, but it is for a vast majority of the ones I've seen and played with, and then he said, well that's why I don't deal with gibson or epiphone guitars. I was about to make a comment about how he had recommended that I should have bought from epiphone, but i decided to leave it at that.
Anyways.. I was left feeling quite ignorant about the situation because I didn't know much about Les Pauls from other brands and such, and so I was wondering if someone would enlighten me and give me some facts about what's better about gibson and what's not, so next time I don't sit there and try to hold up an argument without very much knowledge on what I'm arguing about.
Please and thanks?
Anyways.. I was left feeling quite ignorant about the situation because I didn't know much about Les Pauls from other brands and such, and so I was wondering if someone would enlighten me and give me some facts about what's better about gibson and what's not, so next time I don't sit there and try to hold up an argument without very much knowledge on what I'm arguing about.
Please and thanks?
