Gibson should sue themselves

  • Thread starter scott 351 wins
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Left Paw

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
4,349
Reaction score
2,856
Not really. This is old news. Paul Tutmarc was making solid body electric guitars in the 1930s under the Audiovox name. They didn't have the same cutaway as Gibson but did offer full access to upper frets. And Gibson's own arch tops of the 1930s had a similar cutaway when introduced in 1939. Slingerland introduced a solid body electric guitar in 1939 (no cutaway) and several Rickenbacher guitars were electrified in the 1930s, made of solid materials (aluminum or bakelite). APP has a claim, I suppose, but his idea never went anywhere. Contrast with Leo Fender who took the same idea all the way.
 
Last edited:

freebyrd 69

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
13,573
Reaction score
25,890
He never got it trademarked/patented, so........
 

dsmcl77

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2014
Messages
4,024
Reaction score
10,869
"Almost ten years later, in 1952, Appleton received a letter from a friend at Gibson. The letter read, "Well, App, you see our competition (editor's note: that would be Fender) has finally forced us to come out with your solid guitar. Sure wish we had listened to you back in 1943." Included with the letter was a brochure for the new Gibson Les Paul Model. In frustration, App threw the letter out. "

Ooops!
 

DotStudio

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
6,761
Reaction score
17,046
"Almost ten years later, in 1952, Appleton received a letter from a friend at Gibson. The letter read, "Well, App, you see our competition (editor's note: that would be Fender) has finally forced us to come out with your solid guitar. Sure wish we had listened to you back in 1943." Included with the letter was a brochure for the new Gibson Les Paul Model. In frustration, App threw the letter out. "

Ooops!
For real, I would've had that bad boy laminated on the way to see the attorney.
 

Bill Hicklin

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2014
Messages
13,704
Reaction score
28,576
So, he "threw away" the letter that would have been the crucial evidence in any potential lawsuit. Right. And the dog ate the birth certificate proving I'm the heir the the English throne.

Moreover, Lester Polfuss beat him to the "try to sell Gibson on this" thing. Les took his "Log" to Gibson in 1941.
 

martin H

Senior Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
4,076
Reaction score
6,938
I think Gibson should sue itself on a brand dilution theory, for selling a lot of poorly conceived and badly executed instruments that have damaged the company's reputation for quality products in the marketplace
 

CRobbins

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
11,123
Reaction score
21,554
dc61Mqq.jpg
 

TheX

VIP wannabe
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2008
Messages
55,722
Reaction score
154,429
I think Gibson should sue itself on a brand dilution theory, for selling a lot of poorly conceived and badly executed instruments that have damaged the company's reputation for quality products in the marketplace

Can't disagree with this.
 

lpfan1980

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
6,742
Reaction score
8,542
G
I think Gibson should sue itself on a brand dilution theory, for selling a lot of poorly conceived and badly executed instruments that have damaged the company's reputation for quality products in the marketpl
 

lpfan1980

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
6,742
Reaction score
8,542
Yeah the ceo should walk around with a sandwich board saying our customers want us to feel shame looking very forlorn.
 

Zungle

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
12,728
Reaction score
30,715
The non obvious mistake OW Appleton made, was not producing his solid body guitar himself and taking them to market , immediately after Gibson snubbed him...

This would've given his guitar "Public Disclosure" and possibly established prior art.....

While this would not have given him the IP leverage of a utility or design patent.....it may have kept market open for all others and prevented the Gibson monopoly .......
 
Last edited:

MikeyTheCat

Silver Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Messages
32,137
Reaction score
75,385
"Almost ten years later, in 1952, Appleton received a letter from a friend at Gibson. The letter read, "Well, App, you see our competition (editor's note: that would be Fender) has finally forced us to come out with your solid guitar. Sure wish we had listened to you back in 1943." Included with the letter was a brochure for the new Gibson Les Paul Model. In frustration, App threw the letter out. "

Ooops!

If he threw the letter out how do we know what it said?
 

Olds442

Silver Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
45,834
Reaction score
173,242
PRS should totally sue them.
 

MikeyTheCat

Silver Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Messages
32,137
Reaction score
75,385
The non obvious mistake OW Appleton made, was not producing his solid body guitar himself and taking them to market , immediately after Gibson snubbed him...

This would've given his guitar "Public Disclosure" and possibly established prior art.....

While this would not have given him the IP leverage of a utility or design patent.....it may have kept market open for all others and prevented the Gibson monopoly .......

Gibson has a monopoly?
 

MikeyTheCat

Silver Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Messages
32,137
Reaction score
75,385
Sometimes the circumstances are right for multiple discovery.
A friend of mine came up with an idea for recording to a hard drive. He checked to see if something like that existed or if anyone else was working on it and found nobody was.
A year later there were six including his company, and several released the initial versions of their products at the same trade show. There was no connection between the companies except for looking at the existing technology at the time and seeing what to them was an obvious use for it.
 

Latest Threads



Top
')