For me these frets are really low, and my other one is exactly the same. I've tried a few other and they have frets like this. Well, for me they are very low after playing my other guitars.
76.7 KB Views: 6
Your assessment is, of course, pretty far out of alignment with the historical record on these guitars. The brief Gibson gave Bill Lawrence was for a guitar that would compete with Fender and that would have a very different tonal balance than the mainstream Gibsons of the day. The guitar that Lawrence envisioned and designed was not the guitar that Gibson execs eventually produced, but some of the original concept made it through. It was designed to be brighter than the usual humbucker-equipped guitar (as are Fenders of the era), which may have been part of the reason it was built of maple and not mahogany. The original design was for a double cutaway guitar and the tonal system was different from what eventually made it onto the guitar. I have to agree that the end product looked like a road-killed LP, but upper fret access on the L6S is miles better than on any LP.No thanks. I think they were designed as less-expensive alternative Gibsons, and not conceived for any tonal or other musical purpose. They did the job and some people liked them for that. The were rather bright and harsh, and visually looked like a clumsy version of a LP, and I don't know anyone for whom a L6 was a dream guitar. Nostalgia and the desire to hav e something cheap but supposedlty great is driving the mini-revival that is unlikely to last long, given the mediocrity of the guitar itself. It's ideal for some, and not ideal for most.
I don't think so. I said they were designed to be cheap, and that's the price poinbt at which they came in, and what "competing with Fender" meant, to no small degree. I'm sure you're right about the original design being more aspirational, but if it was not fully-realized, then I'm sure the reason was -- price. I've had a few guitars with Bill Lawrence pickups and on the broad scale and over time there are a fair number of clunkers mixed in with his successes. I think the limited success of the L6S speaks for itself.Your assessment is, of course, pretty far out of alignment with the historical record on these guitars.