Anchor Studs Or Not For LP Style Bridge??

zozoe

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2019
Messages
20
Reaction score
10
Greetings~ As you can see from my pics, my guitar doesn't have those anchors, & is probably more like original LP's,,, Is there any real sustainable benefit for me to switch over to anchors? Is there any one particular brand that reigns supreme?

Thanks all & happy holidays!!
20211225_225525.jpg
Screenshot_20211225-230233_eBay.jpg
 

CB91710

Not Michael Sankar
Double Platinum Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2019
Messages
19,702
Reaction score
61,234
The cork-sniffers will tell you that what you have is better for transmitting tone into the body.
Personally, the anchor studs are a good idea for replacements for imported bridges, but I really have no problem with the Nashville bridge posts.
 

irocdave12

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
4,012
Reaction score
6,538
Most will tell you thats a step in the wrong direction. Many times people are buying the parts to convert the Nashville anchor types over to accept the ABR-1 bridge like you have so you probably don’t want to do the opposite. What you probably will want to do and be able to gain some benefit from is the mod of changing to longer stainless steel studs. That will give you a noticeable improvement and make for a much sturdier bridge that won’t eventually start to lean because the posts bent. If you wanted to go one more step you can get a locking bridge but I got away from using them myself and found not having everything as tight and locked together as possible made for improved sustain
 

1allspub

Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
5,563
Reaction score
7,264
The original ABR-1 design with the posts directly into the wood (like you already have) is widely accepted as the superior design from a tone perspective (and I agree with this---and for clarity's sake, I am not a cork sniffer). The replacement hardware that you show above that allows a Nashville bridge equipped guitar to have an ABR-1 bridge mounted to it was really just designed as a band-aid to make it possible to do so (mostly for cosmetic reasons because people tend to think the ABR-1 looks better too).

Were you to install them in your guitar you would effectively be downgrading your guitar... and were you ever to go to sell it, you'd most likely take a price hit (and have to answer a lot of confused questions as to why you did it in the first place).

IOW, leave your guitar alone! :cheers2:
 

rjwilson37

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
9,319
Reaction score
8,493
Yep, you're already where you want to be with those type of bridge posts.

They have the ones you are showing above to replace anchors that have posts that screw into the anchor.
 

Roxy13

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
15,878
Reaction score
43,617
That's how they did it on the vintage guitars. Almost all of my Japanese guitars have the posts directly into the wood as well. I do have guitars going back to 1973 and I've only had to replace a few posts and we are talking about 40-50 guitars I've had that way plus the ones other people bring over for this or that.
 

Blues_Verne

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
396
Reaction score
707
The more moving parts (with tolerances on top) you have between the strings and the hog slab, the more vibration energy gets lost, hence LESS sustain and definition and tone. Go for it...
 

Banastre

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
200
Reaction score
245
Drilling (widening) the post holes to add anchor bushings can lead to problems. Cracked/chipped finish, a slip or drop of a reamer (I'd be wary of using a drill) and maybe a rising anchor that would need attention later.
I went with the 'deeper' mod mentioned. Took a stock ABR post down to the hardware store and got a couple stainless ones that I cut (don't want those poking out the back!!!). More secure, more sustain and not likely to bend over time.
 

MP4-22

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
1,390
Reaction score
1,585
The more moving parts (with tolerances on top) you have between the strings and the hog slab, the more vibration energy gets lost, hence LESS sustain and definition and tone. Go for it...


That's guitar nerd BS... I'd be more worried about the type of speaker in my amp and a fresh set of strings.
 

efstop

Protective of my energy reserve
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
16,532
Reaction score
45,996
Doesn't physics say the more vibrations absorbed and damped by the body, the fewer vibrations there are to excite the magnetic fields?
 

zozoe

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2019
Messages
20
Reaction score
10
Great & thanks for all the affirmations & advice.... So, is what I have, the Nashville you speak of?
peace
 

CB91710

Not Michael Sankar
Double Platinum Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2019
Messages
19,702
Reaction score
61,234
Great & thanks for all the affirmations & advice.... So, is what I have, the Nashville you speak of?
peace
You have the original ABR-1 type.
 

CB91710

Not Michael Sankar
Double Platinum Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2019
Messages
19,702
Reaction score
61,234
ABR-1

ABR-1-Tune-o-matic-Bridge-0-256-256.png



Nashville

Nashville-Tune-o-matic-Bridge-0-256-256.png



The adapters that you shared are intended to replace the Nashville studs and provide a single-piece connection between the thumbwheel and the body.
You already have that with the ABR-1, and it is considered to be the preferred configuration.


There is a 3rd bridge configuration that Gibson began using on the Original Series in 2019, and that is the Nashville studs/adjusters with the ABR-1 bridge and saddles.
 

Blues_Verne

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
396
Reaction score
707
That's guitar nerd BS... I'd be more worried about the type of speaker in my amp and a fresh set of strings.
YES, you're right about your assesment. Sometimes it might help your understanding if you try to experience yourself before you misjudge others. Just sayin'
 

Latest Threads



Top