Aged True Historic - Factory Buckle Rash or Not

Sahalee

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
7
Reaction score
12
I purchased sight unseen an Aged True Historic from an authorized dealer that told me I am/would be the first owner of the guitar. Upon delivery, I immediately noticed that there was significant buckle rash that did not look consistent with the rest of the aging of the guitar. I would like to get opinions on if people believe this was part of the factory aging process or occurred after. Thanks for any insight.

IMG_6208 (1).jpg
 
Last edited:

PierM

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
4,999
Reaction score
9,371
More info on the guitar? Also more pics.

Hard to give you an opinion just based on a closeup.
 

Sahalee

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
7
Reaction score
12
2016 59 True Historic Factory Aged. Here are two more photos of the back. I love the aging expect for that one particular area of the close up. I can appreciate that it probably sounds silly asking about buckle rash on an aged guitar.
backtop.jpg
backbottom.jpg
 

Tim Plains

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
13,101
Reaction score
9,062
I would think not factory aging but you have keep in mind that Gibson has not made any True Historics in over two years, so even if you are the first owner, that guitar may have sat in a music store all this time. Don't ever buy guitars sight unseen unless it's at/below wholesale, even then.
 

MikeyV

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
374
Reaction score
275
Probably not factory, but I like it. I put a little purposeful rash on the back of my '14 R8.
 

freebyrd 69

Premium Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
12,391
Reaction score
22,694
I would think the same thing you do....probably not factory. You can call Gibson and give them the serial number. Tell them your concern about being the first owner, and they can tell you where the guitar was originally shipped. That might help check the honesty of the selling dealer. If you aren't the first owner, or that guitar was shipped somewhere else originally, I would tell that dealer to stick it up their ass.
 

RAG7890

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
15,707
Reaction score
25,675
I purchased sight unseen an Aged True Historic from an authorized dealer that told me I am/would be the first owner of the guitar. Upon delivery, I immediately noticed that there was significant buckle rash that did not look consistent with the rest of the aging of the guitar. I would like to get opinions on if people believe this was part of the factory aging process or occurred after. Thanks for any insight.

View attachment 404233
This is an extremely rare & valuable collectible edition marked by.............................



:cheers2:
 

Sahalee

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
7
Reaction score
12
I appreciate all the feedback. Kinda confirming my suspicion that it is not factory aging which is of course why I posted. I thought I would share the money shot of the guitar because other than the marks on the back it is a nice guitar. I did contact Gibson and they were able to confirm that it has not been registered by anyone else. It is a reputable dealer. I did get a good price assuming it was in mint condition as originally described. I am worried about the marks because this guitar is more of a collectible for me than anything I would every play. I appreciate any additional feedback. Thanks.
front.jpg
 

Pete M

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
6,036
Reaction score
9,125
Regardless of what I think about buying a Historic to collect and keep under the bed, or the irony of thinking real play-wear ruins a fake aged guitar - there's no way that was part of the intended factory aging process and buyers will know that if you intend to sell it in future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jer

Duane_the_tub

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
2,819
Reaction score
5,217
The buckle rash is not consistent with any factory aging I've ever seen. Not sure that would be enough to dissuade me from keeping such a nice guitar, but you're the one who has to look at it every day. If it bugs you now it's going to bug you forever.
 

Mattcran

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
55
Reaction score
61
I've got a newer factory aged r9 and the buckle rash looks like scribbles you'd make trying to get an ink pen going over about a 3" wide area. I think they vary and factory aging is quite different than Murphy. Still trying to decide if I like factory.
 

Sct13

Gold Supporter
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
18,065
Reaction score
22,068
Nice guitar....

Just play it....Probably not factory....but I 'm thinking it wont affect tone or playability....Congrats
 

Sct13

Gold Supporter
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
18,065
Reaction score
22,068
come to think of it my aged guitars do have that kind of buckle rash...

I do know that they use the handle end of a screw driver like tool to do that as well...

So I doubt its actually a belt buckle....
 




Top