60-65 differences

sbeng

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
146
Reaction score
37
Other than not being called a Les Paul, are there any major differences in 1960 through 1965 SGs?
 

geochem1st

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
27,748
Reaction score
40,936
I found that the 61's had the thinnest necks and bodies and they started to make them more substantial around after 63. Not a huge difference but noticeable if you play them. The use of PAF's also stopped around that year. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
 

SoloDallas

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
1,470
Reaction score
790
I found that the 61's had the thinnest necks and bodies and they started to make them more substantial around after 63. Not a huge difference but noticeable if you play them. The use of PAF's also stopped around that year. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

That is completely correct.

They all sported vibrolas, but around '63-'64 the vibrola was changed from sideways to Maestro "Lyre". Still sucks balls in terms of operation, but definitely looks different. That will help you see the difference as well among them.
 

LPSGME

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
3,251
I think in the early years that the neck joints varied some depending on which way the wind was blowing. I'm also not sure how long the 'Fretless Wonder' frets were used, and don't think I've ever heard it said. They also changed the plate between the neck and neck pickup to remove Les Paul's name as the supply of plates ran out - even though they were supposed to have stopped using his name after the first year or so.
 

Dolebludger

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
18,319
Reaction score
19,226
I believe the neck joint with the body changed sometime between '61 and '65. The '61s had a smooth neck joint that merely tapered into the body. Later models had a "stair step".
 

SG Lou

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2009
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
1,838
I believe the neck joint with the body changed sometime between '61 and '65. The '61s had a smooth neck joint that merely tapered into the body. Later models had a "stair step".


From my archives - some heel joint photos from some sixties SGs.
Hope these pictures help

1961
61SGStandard.jpg


1962
1962.jpg


1963
1963.jpg


1965
1965.jpg


1966
1966.jpg


1970
MVC-039F.jpg


62 RI

62SGback-1.jpg


1967 Special

SG009.jpg


Contemporary special ('05)

P1020805.jpg


1995 Special
P8250213.jpg

P8250215.jpg


1967 Special
P8250223.jpg

P8250225.jpg

P8250226.jpg
 

SG Lou

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2009
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
1,838
1970 Standard
P8250217.jpg

P8250219.jpg

P8250218.jpg



1961 Standard


SGLP.jpg


SG2NeckBack.jpg


1969 SG Standard
IMG_1549.jpg
 

Lebo

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
231
One doubt I own what I believe is a 65 sg special, but the heel joint looks like the 63, is that right? or what it could be?
 

Kevin James

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
1,516
Reaction score
1,170
One doubt I own what I believe is a 65 sg special, but the heel joint looks like the 63, is that right? or what it could be?

Post a picture of the heel and the serial number range and we'll get it figured out for you.
 

Lebo

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
231
These a the pictures of the serial and the neck joint, and some others, thanks
lafoto.jpg

IMG_0049.jpg

IMG_0046.jpg

IMG_0045.jpg
 

Kevin James

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
1,516
Reaction score
1,170
These a the pictures of the serial and the neck joint, and some others, thanks
lafoto.jpg

IMG_0049.jpg

IMG_0046.jpg

IMG_0045.jpg

Very hard to make out that heel pic as it looks like you snapped the pic from about 1 inch away LOL

Anyways, it is clear that it is a smooth heel joint and that along with the serial number puts that without question as a 1961.
 

geochem1st

V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
27,748
Reaction score
40,936
Very hard to make out that heel pic as it looks like you snapped the pic from about 1 inch away LOL

Anyways, it is clear that it is a smooth heel joint and that along with the serial number puts that without question as a 1961.

True that. Great guitar. Like to see it restored. :thumb:
 

Lebo

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
231
Very hard to make out that heel pic as it looks like you snapped the pic from about 1 inch away LOL

Anyways, it is clear that it is a smooth heel joint and that along with the serial number puts that without question as a 1961.

Are you serious?
 

Lebo

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
231
for the love of god keep it red!

I already have 1 or two in red, and I believe the original color was black, but I for the pickup cavities and the control cavities, but I believe that the only black 61 sg was the standard, so I don't know, that's why I was planning on paint her in white or black, but I don't know
 

Latest Threads



Top