That set is long gone. I still think they were not good pickups for playing with any decent gain due to all the squealing. Maybe I got a bad set.
That said, I have another set that came out of a 2021 R9. Feel free to PM me if interested. They won't be cheap.
OP I think you put way too much stock in finishes. You say you had a goldtop that was the lightest/best of the best sounding LPs you ever had....then ditched it because the finish was too "new" and didn't have a braz rw board.
Sounds little like crazy talk to me ....or just shilling for HM...
So are you saying that the WW Spec historics are no different than a regular historic minus the lower wind pickups?
If so, that contradicts what WW says on their website:
"...so our resident Gibson expert visited the Custom Shop to hand-pick each and every top and fretboard."
I've owned a bunch...
Based on fretwear, rusted parts, chips, etc. someone played the snot out of it. It almost looks like it might have been refinished which could explain the funny business around the serial number. Fretboard looks legit braz and serial falls within the range.
See this thread: https://www.mylespaul.com/threads/4600-for-a-murphy-paint-job.466040/page-3#post-10163012
Basically, you can get a VOS with the ML lacquer but they are painted by Murphy and are priced accordingly.
Hard to imagine paying $11K for a VOS R8 with a plain top just because Murphy...
OP here. Thanks for everyone's input. So far the consensus is that the ML finish/aging doesn't necessarily help make the guitars sound any better but adds a different feel from regular gloss or VOS finishes.
I owned an HM at one point so I kinda know what is meant by the feel, which is...
We've all probably read threads debating spec changes over the years that supposedly have positive effects on tone such as Brazilian r/w, hide glue, unpotted CBs, lightweight tailpieces, etc. ML reissues have quite an upcharge over their non-ML counterparts and the ML finish/aging is about the...