Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Pickups' started by WolfeMacleod, Mar 7, 2017.
Isn't it too late to submit?
No, it's not too late. The previous deadline was in response to a motion to dismiss due to lack of standing, which DiMarzio lost, thanks to the declarations that were received having established standing. Additional declarations going forward will help demonstrate to the USPTO that there are many guitarists who are unable to make their guitars look how they want them to look, while also having the freedom to buy pickups from any company they choose.
Thanks Antigua, the call was definitely on the Dimarzio's side. I believe it was Brent Davis. If called upon, I will obviously have no choice but to respond and honor our system. Supposedly, many people who signed the petition may have used false names (according to the Lawyer) as I was only a few that was able to be reached.
No one called me. I'll go.
No fake name used.
It's very unlikely that anyone used a false name, considering the declaration form says, where it is to be signed and dated, a stating of section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that it would be unlawful to have put a false name. Besides, it behooves us all to be honest with the USPTO.
The most likely reason that only few people can be reached is because only some of the declarants provided contact information, in addition to their email address.
I hope any and every guitarist who ever wanted a double cream pickup made by Lollar, or Seymour Duncan, or Throbak takes this opportunity to legally stand up for themselves and other guitarists. This is an opportunity that is unlikely to happen again if the petition doesn't succeed. I've even had people from outside the U.S. who like U.S. made pickups, and wish they could submit a declaration, but this is a legal right that only U.S. citizens are allowed to exercise, and so we should.
The implication that people submitted declarations under false names really seems like sour grapes to me. IMHO it's much more likely that only a few of the people who submitted declarations live close enough to either the court or DiMarzio's attorneys to be subpoenaed for a deposition.
Phone is an unreliable contact method today, honestly if I don’t know the number it goes straight to voicemail.
Being that many of the declarations were due to my sending out several hundred emails to customers... who I've received Paypal payments from... I highly doubt they used fake names.
They can supeona me if they'd like, sibce I signed one. I'll gladly go. But I'll bet they won't, cause I know my stuff when it comes to this particular matter. In fact.. I'd be very surprised if they did.
It just occurred to me that he may think my name is fake. lolz.
That, or one of the lawyers is actually the Kurgan......
Sorry I haven't been following this over the years. Is this really a problem nowadays? Seems like there are a number of pickup makers offering double cream as a standard option. Or is it just that Seymour Duncan that gets sued if they do a double cream humbucker?
Any US based pickup manufacturer can get a letter from DiMarzio's lawyers if they breach the Double Cream bobbin Trademark. The rest of the world isn't subject to the TM as most other places won't let you trademark an unspecified color. DiMarzio was lucky getting this one passed with the existing wording. Not sure if it would fly today but I'm not up to date on USA TM regs anymore. Wolfe will have that info.
Honestly, my double cream market is less than 10% of sales but I get that it wouldn't be fun having unrealistic regulations holding you back.
DiMarzio most recently sued Shepton for offering double cream pickups, and Shepton has since ceased and desisted. If you want to make a difference, follow this link.
FWIW, Sheptone is not the only pickup maker sued by DM for "discussible" reasons... A reminder can be found in the post 8, here:
This won't be settled any time soon..... extension issued last week:
I have double cream set from one of best and high end winders out here, but must be shipped covered.