http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/world/middleeast/syria-chemical-weapons.html?ref=global-home&_r=0 WASHINGTON The Obama administration, concluding that the troops of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria have used chemical weapons against rebel forces in his countrys civil war, has decided to begin supplying the rebels for the first time with small arms and ammunition, according to American officials. The officials held out the possibility that the assistance, coordinated by the Central Intelligence Agency, could include antitank weapons, but they said that for now supplying the antiaircraft weapons that rebel commanders have said they sorely need is not under consideration. Supplying weapons to the rebels has been a long-sought goal of advocates of a more aggressive American response to the Syrian civil war. A proposal made last year by David H. Petraeus, then the director of the C.I.A., and backed by the State Department and the Pentagon to supply weapons was rejected by the White House because of President Obamas deep reluctance to be drawn into another war in the Middle East. But even with the decision to supply lethal aid, the Obama administration remains deeply divided about whether to take more forceful action to try to quell the fighting, which has killed more than 90,000 people over more than two years. Many in the American government believe that the military balance has tilted so far against the rebels in recent months that American shipments of arms to select groups may be too little, too late. Some senior State Department officials have been pushing for a more aggressive military response, including airstrikes to hit the primary landing strips in Syria that the Assad government uses to launch the chemical weapons attacks, ferry troops around the country and receive shipments of arms from Iran. But White House officials remain wary, and on Thursday Benjamin J. Rhodes, one of Mr. Obamas top foreign policy advisers, all but ruled out the imposition of a no-fly zone and indicated that no decision had been made on other military actions. _________________________________________________________ .. So our intelligence agencies have "confirmed" this use of WMD's ... .. ya know .. this seems familiar .. .. My question is .. who are these people we are going to arm up .. and why are they any better than Assad ? .. if they gain control there will be mass killings just as there were in Iraq .. this is a religious civil war that is none of our business .. I am sorry for those being killed .. but this will end badly no matter what the US does. ..