String action on a Firebird T

Discussion in 'Other Gibsons' started by Mitchey75, Sep 8, 2017.

  1. Mitchey75

    Mitchey75 Member

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    75
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Hi. I am really experienced with the adjustment of string actions etc on several guitars but my 2017 Firebird T is giving me some headache...eventually you can help me..

    I am using 010-046 strings, prefer to have the neck in a slight negative shape, a low height of the strings and the tailpiece ideally sitting flat on the body to have a bit more pressure on the strings.

    Although the neck is bent in a slight negative position, I have to set the bridge very high to avoid any buzzing of the strings. Therefore the string action is very high. Additionally I have to set the tailpiece very high to avoid the contact of the strings with the edge of the bridge. This causes very wobbling strings.

    I already tried to adjust bridge and tailpiece in several positions, the neck in a different way (more negative, less negative, straight) and I always gave the neck 4-5 days of time after the truss rod adjustment but somehow his guy makes me crazy...

    Do you (FB owners) have any recommendation, tips, hints for me?

    Eventually this has something to do with the new angled pick up - positions (thanks to the user jimmer_5 who posted this pic in another thread). As I can see the bridge needs to be set very high to avoid any contact of the strings with the PUs what causes a much higher action like on the former models.

    I don't mind having some buzzing strings here and there and I know that a neck-through type of guitar can be tricky and different to a set on-neck but somehow it must be possible to play a 2017 Gibson with a deeper string action and without buzzing on several frets...

    What do you think?

    IMG_8957.jpg
     
  2. filtersweep

    filtersweep Senior Member

    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    493
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Why negative relief? I have only heard that desired by those who actually want some buzz, like for some flamenco guitars.
     
  3. Mitchey75

    Mitchey75 Member

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    75
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    IMG_8961.PNG

    I meant I want to have the neck in a slight negative direction as shown on the
    lowest model!?!?
     
  4. Mitchey75

    Mitchey75 Member

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    75
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    In general I want to set up the guitar properly with a low action...
     
  5. Guitaraxe

    Guitaraxe Senior Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    314
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2015
    Interesting comparison of old pup mounts and new.

    If you run out of ideas, you might just set the guitar up per' Gibson spec's and see where that takes you.

    Me, I typically set the neck relief per' Gibby spec's in the owners manual, set the action by feel (comfortable bending full steps at higher frets) and adjust the stop bar so the string break angle is close as possible to the bridge without touching it. Once that's all done I adjust the pups to taste.
     
    Mitchey75 likes this.
  6. ARandall

    ARandall Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,847
    Likes Received:
    6,047
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    The above pics you have attached don't really work for a Gibson, as you cannot shim the neck like a bolton.

    You either have concave....where there is more gap in the centre fret area (say 5-15), or convex where there is an upward hump in the same area.
    And the individual guitar is as much to do with bridge and tailpiece height. There is a variation in neck angle from guitar to guitar - even a neckthrough like a FB. And small changes in the interface area between neck and body make big differences when it gets to the bridge.

    You will need to do a holistic setup.....looking at the frets, checking the neck with a straightedge as well as checking nut slots and then setting up.
     
    Mitchey75 likes this.
  7. Cjsinla

    Cjsinla Premium Member

    Messages:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    As I can see the bridge needs to be set very high to avoid any contact of the strings with the PUs what causes a much higher action like on the former models. ?????

    If this is the case, lower the pups.
     
  8. Mitchey75

    Mitchey75 Member

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    75
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    I meant that the height of the 2017 PUs is bigger than on the former models because of the PU frames. Therfore the Bridge has to be higher, too. Of course I will set the PUs low but I still need a specific height of the bridge becaause of the PUs...

    Nevertheless, thank you all for your answers! I will sit down with my bird on the Weekend and will have a look and try as recommended!
     
    Guitaraxe likes this.
  9. ARandall

    ARandall Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,847
    Likes Received:
    6,047
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    I have never come across a gibson where the pickup rings supplied with it were anywhere close to making contact with the strings. So the pickup can to my knowledge be set at any height needed to make the height work with whatever the guitar and setup requires.

    And the bridge height above the body is not a setup criteria in any way....strings over the frets are.
     
    endial likes this.
  10. lung plunger

    lung plunger Senior Member

    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    1,007
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2017
    Also just thinking out loud...

    Would it be possible to shave the base of the pup ring down?
     
  11. jimmer_5

    jimmer_5 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,253
    Likes Received:
    979
    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    This was my thought as well - if necessary, you could block sand the underside of the angled plastic pickup ring.
     
  12. Guitaraxe

    Guitaraxe Senior Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    314
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2015
    Switching to the flat rings might also be an option if the new type rings are giving the OP' some trouble.
     
  13. 74JMP

    74JMP Senior Member

    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    541
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    What frets buzz, the rod only works in certain regions. So PLek or not you might need a dress. Check your saddles, one string seated too low can cause a buzz at a fret while the strings next to it are fine. Bought a 91 FB in 2000 that had pretty much been a closet queen. Took a few setups and a fret dress to get it right. Birds can be very finicky and might be worth it to have a pro do it. Once they are right they re very stable my vintage bird and my 91 never need much TLC.
     
  14. 74JMP

    74JMP Senior Member

    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    541
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    What frets buzz, the rod only works in certain regions. So PLek or not you might need a dress. Check your saddles, one string seated too low can cause a buzz at a fret while the strings next to it are fine. Bought a 91 FB in 2000 that had pretty much been a closet queen. Took a few setups and a fret dress to get it right. Birds can be very finicky and might be worth it to have a pro do it. Once they are right they re very stable my vintage bird and my 91 never need much TLC.
     
  15. Guitaraxe

    Guitaraxe Senior Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    314
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2015
    How are the new rings made? Checking them up close at the Sweetwater site it looks like they just added a spacer/ second ring and put the typical flat Bird' metal rings right on top of it. Are they two piece?
     
  16. Marln864

    Marln864 Junior Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    My 2017 is 2 pieces. I had to do a lot of back & forth to get mine set up with minimum buzz.
     
    Guitaraxe likes this.

Share This Page