pat no 2737842....here we go again!

Discussion in 'Pickups' started by usmcLP, Jun 10, 2011.

  1. usmcLP

    usmcLP Senior Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    35
    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Hello! Thisq thread is going to be more of a complaint than anything else. Maybe someone can be of assistance here. I have a 1986 Les Paul Custom in "Clownburst" (as they call it). Anyway, I love the action on this thing, very smooth and heavy like an anvil. Now onto the problem...my tone.

    My tone is shit (in my opinion). Maybe it's the amp im using, maybe it's a cheap cable maybe... hell iono what it is. When I think of Les Paul Customs, I am reminded of that beautiful warm fuzzy feeling you get when someone plays it on a clean channel. My amp is a Marshall MG 250 DFX (solid state of course) so I'm thinking thats why I'm not getting that fuzzy feeling, and my pickups have the (stamped) 2737842 number on them, which I've heard are not even the PAT. NO. for the pickups, something about a trapazise peice or something?

    I also own a Marshall Class 5 but I sent it back home before I got the custom (I'm stationed in NC so I don't have alot of room) so maybe I that's what Im missing.

    So my whole main point of this thread... what's up with these pickups? They are capped with faded gold (worn out is more like it) and to me, they just don't sound "old" enough. The only tone I like out of the custom is the middle position with volumes turned back and tone down to about 7 or 6 on both knobs. My main complaint is the bridge pickup. It doesnt have that Gibson bite that I expect.....but then again, maybe it's my amp. I mean it's a Marshall sure, but it's not tube..

    *sigh* I rant, WAY too much. Sorry if this is confusing, I just dont know how to word what I'm thinking.
     
  2. Indyclone

    Indyclone Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    I think the patent number is for the tune-o-matic bridge...

    I also think an '86 Custom would have come with Tim Shaw pickups... which have that number stamped on them.
    They also had ink stamps on them... well, most of them did, but not all of them.

    The best way to tell if they're shaws is to take the cover off, take a picture and show them to us.
    Shaws had rough cast magnets... they'd look bumpy.


    I suppose it's possible that you have P490's, a generic precursor to the 490R and 490T.


    Either way, you would probably notice a good diference if you just installed new pots, 500k's will bring out more bite than what's in there. What's in there may be 300k's or a combination of 300k's and 500k's.

    If after you do that it's still not enough for you, then I suppose you could look at swapping pickups..
     
  3. captcoolaid

    captcoolaid Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Okay I got beet up about this a while back for my ignorance. The serial is for the Trapeze from 57 I think. They should be Shaws is there the stamp on the bottom or could they be a dirty finger. What is the DC of them. That as well as the picture would be a great place to start.
     
  4. usmcLP

    usmcLP Senior Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    35
    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Alright, I get off work in about an hour and I will go home and take some pics for you guys just bear with me a little bit. yeah, my SG (2006 standard) is the only guitar I have with real bite to them and I heard some1 mention the ones with 2737842 stamped on them (no ink, just a stamp, unless the ink has worn all the way off) were dirty fingers but I just hate the mud I get from them. I mean it's not epiphone mud but one thing I noticed for sure... Lets say I play a G chord...... If i just pick the botton 2 strings (bottom to me is e and B) THEN I pick the top E (big E), it pretty much kills my bright tone out. I mean almost drowns it. It's pretty damn annoying to me because I can't get a full chord sound. But as stated, i will get home and snap some pics for you guys a.s.a.p. What all do you want pics of? The back of the pup, the pots? the wiring? Just let me know I'll check it when I get home and get right on it. Thanks for the help guys. Damn good forum.

    By the way, I thought tim shaws were the ones with the goofy circuit board on them? Im not a pup expert by any means.
     
  5. Indyclone

    Indyclone Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
     
  6. captcoolaid

    captcoolaid Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Yeah I got called out on that a few months ago. but in all fairness i was being a dick sort of. But yes a female winder here on the forum steered to my own gospel page that I should have read a bit better. Doh
     
  7. captcoolaid

    captcoolaid Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    The ones with the pcb on them were Bill Lawrence designed not Shaw. Shaw stepped in around July or August of 1980 and was there I think until 88 or so. Rod Kinkade over at Skatterbrane knows a bit more about this than I do, But I believe that the Shaws were in full swing by late 1980
     
  8. Indyclone

    Indyclone Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    From what I've heard, aside from the original PAF's, the Shaw is the best humbucker to ever come in a Les Paul.
     
  9. CrackTheSkye

    CrackTheSkye Senior Member

    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Not sure about the pickups but I'd place most of the blame on your amp. Most people avoid Marshall MG's like the plague. Sure it's fine for practice and to save space but that's about it. I think once you plugged into your Class 5 you'd feel a lot better about your LP and your tone.
     
    jamman and diceman like this.
  10. captcoolaid

    captcoolaid Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Agreed
     
  11. usmcLP

    usmcLP Senior Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    35
    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Thanks guys, I thinking thats the problem too. I always bought MG cause of the price but I really didnt think it would sacrifice that much tone and variation. Plus the 250 dfx with x2 12" cel speakers for 650.... vs a 5 watt 1 10" cel speaker class 5 for 500..... yeah I really thought the extra 150 was worth it...... Why... oh why did I send my class 5 home :(. WELL money isn't an issue for me, so in all honestly, what do would you guys suggest for a good tube amp. No $2000 + b.s. but a good little small tube...something by vox? I dont want to buy another class 5 since that is redundant but I would like a tube amp that has channel select. That was the one thing the class 5 lacked. By the time you turn the volume up to get distortion. It was so god damn loud that my ears would pop.



    regarding the SHAW.... how does it stack up to 57' classics? I hear alot of good things about them
     
  12. captcoolaid

    captcoolaid Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    The Vox AC30 or, and I will get killed for this, but the peavy VK100 is real nice as well.

    Before I get blasted, all the clips done for W B when I was there was done on a VK100 and you all loved the tone.
     
  13. usmcLP

    usmcLP Senior Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    35
    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
  14. Indyclone

    Indyclone Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    1,652
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Vox Ac4TV8

    It has a 1/10th watt setting, you can get great tube overdrive with that at a low volume.

    I have one, but I'm not too fond of the 8" speaker, so I plug it into a 1x12 cab with a Vintage 30.


    I don't think Vox makes the AC4TV8 anymore though, they have a smaller version with a 6 1/2" speaker (AC4TV Mini)... and it still has the 1/10th watt setting.
     
  15. LtKojak

    LtKojak Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,881
    Likes Received:
    2,488
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    I can relate to this... in the early 70s with my '68 Gibson Les Paul Custom I couldn't do any soaring lead because the bridge p'up sounded so anemic it seemed it had terminal cancer. After crashing and burning a couple of very important shows with my band, I couldn't take'em out fast enough!

    The p'ups were T-Tops.

    As the market today are hyping'em, every time I mention how hard they sucked, most of the time I get called names for telling it like it is.

    Without pictures of you p'ups I can't make any educated guess, but if they're what I think they're, you should take'em out and selling'em in the used market and with that money buy REAL GOOD p'ups.

    My two pence worth of nothing.

    HTH,


    PS: even though your amp is NOT one of the best of the bunch, you should at least be able to get decent tones out of it... so if your p'ups are what they called "Patent Number", chances are they're the most probable culprit of your lack of tone.

    Ok, let the torching begin now...
     
  16. usmcLP

    usmcLP Senior Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    35
    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Well like I said, when I get home I will be able to get some pics for you guys... I know what t tops are supposted to look like but mine are capped.... do you um... want me to umm...take the covers off? I don't want to take them off if I cant get them back on. I'm not the best at removing caps without putting a little bend in them. Then again open coils on a les paul look good so its a win win.
     
  17. captcoolaid

    captcoolaid Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    No torching at all Lolli pop King. I am with you on the T-top thing. They are either nice or anemic pending the player. But you should start with the amp.
     
    nwobhm likes this.
  18. nwobhm

    nwobhm Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    358
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    I'd try the pots first.
     
  19. usmcLP

    usmcLP Senior Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    35
    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    will there be a stamp on the pots letting me know if they are 300 or 500?


    regardless, im still going to get those pics out to people of everything pups pots stamps ect ect but I really appriceate all of the input from everyone. I wish I knew (totally lost my train of thought...) oh yeah! I wish I could be at home now but... you godda love the military..

    "hey get cleaned up we're releasing at 10:00!!"

    *2 hours later*

    "why are we still here?...." ...

    ooh-mother-fukin-rah
     
  20. nwobhm

    nwobhm Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    358
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Yeah, they should be marked on the back of the pots. I had an 85' Custom that had Shaws in it. Dirty Fingers will have double screw poles and no covers, usually. BTW, I used to buy alot of guitars around the Jacksonville and Fayetteville area. Used to be good huntin ground! ;)
     

Share This Page