Heavier Guitars Sound Thicker?

Discussion in 'Tonefreaks' started by Elkoki, Nov 18, 2018.

  1. somebodyelseuk

    somebodyelseuk Senior Member

    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    411
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2018
    Regarding the Yamahas. The SG2000 had the same bridge as the rest of the SG range, except for the SG200 and SG3000 which had copies of the ABR-1.
    The brass "sustain plate" doesn't weigh 3/4 of a pound. It covers an area the same size as the bridge unit and is less than a quarter inch thick.
    The through neck is a maple centre section with mahogany either side.
    I have owned, since '84, both an '82 SG2000S and an '84 SG1000S.
    The SG1000S has a thinner body, slightly thinner neck profile, set mahogany neck, rosewood board (as opposed to ebony on the SG2000) and the bridge posts are screwed direct in to the top, like on an ABR-1 equipped LP.
    The sustain of the two is exactly the same. The SG1000 is brighter in tone, most likely because the pickups are open coiled versions of the SG2000 pickups - they're otherwise identical.

    Nothing much was "proven" in the '70s. It was mostly myths and guesswork.
     
  2. HogmanA

    HogmanA Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,017
    Likes Received:
    725
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    I enjoy your posts very much korus - I don't think I have ever felt disagreement with anything you have posted, and you have at times encouraged me to look at something from a different angle.

    It would be a shame (and is a shame) when people such as yourself allow the clowns to discourage from posting.

    You have to remember that clowns are more vocal/ visible and for every clown you may have 50 people who get it/ get something from it but would never post.
    Of course, then you have the sheep that follow the most vocal/ visible...



    !
     
  3. ehb

    ehb Chief Discombobulator Gold Supporter Premium Member

    Messages:
    27,593
    Likes Received:
    125,338
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Consistency of grain/density/weight distribution....

    Consistency of all three...

    There is heavy shitwood... Weight alone means little...

    Consistency.
     
  4. Tomsmenace

    Tomsmenace Senior Member

    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    590
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Heavy can equal awesome....depends. Seems to give more depth to the sound in certain circumstances. THe quality and type of wood...how it's used.
     
  5. gkelm

    gkelm Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,035
    Likes Received:
    241
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Yep. The lighter historics sound "airy" to me. Thought I would like that, but not meaty enough. I have an R9, and while other factors might be at play, I think the 9.2 weight may be a factor. My 9+ lb custom sounds fantastic. I remember this was the conventional wisdom back in the 70s, taken further by brass blocks, nuts, etc....at least with les pauls. Maybe old guys with bad backs changed all that. ;)
     
    Elkoki likes this.
  6. dspelman

    dspelman Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,259
    Likes Received:
    6,376
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    The brass sustain plate weighs 10.5 ounces. Same as on the Ibanez Artist AR300 I have from 1982. Both are pretty deep into a rout in the body and are bolted to the body itself. You're right about the neck -- it's a three-piece neck. The SG2000 has "covers" that enclose the sides of the coils, but the bobbin is open. My SG2000 bridge is quite a bit heavier than a standard ABR. Yours?

    The 70's were notable for a LOT of things (and yes, it was a LOT of experimentation) including the Search For Sustain and the Search for Treble. "Heavier and denser" were the obvious solutions for sustain, which is why you had guitars like the Plex Dan Armstrong and the Travis Bean (and, of course, the Kramer aluminum neck guitars). That much wasn't myth. I have Moonstones with active Bartolinis that have a *pair* of treble boosts built in. My Moonstone Vulcan has a solid (one-piece), heavy very thick maple burl body mated to a multi-layer maple (and other woods) neck with an ebony fretboard and (I believe) a brass nut. My L5S is solid maple (multipiece neck). Carvin was making almost everything out of rock maple in those days. Weight isn't everything, of course; a pound of feathers attached to the strings or bridge won't give you the same sustain as a pound of brass. Density counts.

    Travis Bean guitars sometimes had a bit of wood between the bridge and the through-neck (aluminum) but late in the production run produced at least one that had the bridge mounted directly to the aluminum through-neck. There was no question about the improvement in sustain and there was also a noticeable increase in treble (which is usually the first thing that begins to disappear from the string energy). As someone noted at the time, you can always reduce frequencies that are there in abundance, but it's a lot harder to manufacturer those that don't make it out of the guitar.
     
  7. grayd8

    grayd8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    Joined:
    May 5, 2014
    I have two solid LP’s, 8lbs, 12 oz and 8 lbs, 15 oz. The lighter one definitely has a thicker bluesier tone, so I would say weight doesn’t really matter.

    Additionally my SG is 7 lbs, 3 oz and it can get some heavy tones too.
     
  8. gkelm

    gkelm Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,035
    Likes Received:
    241
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Had an SG2000 in the early 80s...fantastic guitar! Carlos sported one during the Moonflower era. I’d like to land another one some day.
     
  9. somebodyelseuk

    somebodyelseuk Senior Member

    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    411
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2018
    What Yamaha, the guitar industry and history proved is that the brass plate, heavy bridge and through neck made no difference - they actually made a big deal about fitting a lightweight bridge directly to the top on the SG3000.
    Since the SG went out of production in '88, they haven't used these features on any guitars, even the limited runs of SGs they've done since, other than SG2000 reissues.
    The pickup 'semi' covers... wow.... all the deficiencies of a full cover with none of the benefits. The tops of the bobbins are exposed, the sides covered. You still get the 'eddy currents' and high frequency attenuation of a full cover, but it doesn't screen the pickup - the original point of the humbucker cover.
     
  10. Brazilnut

    Brazilnut Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,743
    Likes Received:
    9,691
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    But to me, and I am an SG player for years, the heavier SGs-7 to 8 lbs-sound meatier than the lightweights. Plus they don't neck dive.
     
    Elkoki likes this.
  11. dspelman

    dspelman Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,259
    Likes Received:
    6,376
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    If you play an SG3000 next to an SG2000, you'll note that there are definitely differences, mostly because of the Spinex pickups on the 3000 series. I think the brass sustain block, heavy bridge and through neck are simply expensive, and the majority of guitar players didn't want to pay for them during the '80's. Yamaha marketing wasn't the best in those days, either.

    The pickup semi-covers are something else that didn't make the marketing cut. But they're still out there, in both plastic and metal. They keep sweat and grime out of the pickups, and I've never heard anyone complain that there isn't enough treble from those pickups.
     
  12. charlie chitlins

    charlie chitlins Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,002
    Likes Received:
    2,609
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    But was it TONE wood he clamped on? :p
     

Share This Page