![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,334
Thanks: 70
Thanked 27 Times in 15 Posts
|
1964 Gibson SG for $17,500
http://www.frettedamericana.com/gibs...-d-1122-0.html
Not concerned with the asking price, but Fretted Americana's claim: This example is from arguably the best year of the "original style" SG Standards and has the great advantage of the far superior Gibson "Deluxe Vibrola" as opposed to the clumsy and cumbersome "side-to-side" vibrola that is found on the earlier Standards. It also has the stronger neck joint that was introduced in early 1963. Best year is a bold claim. Phil X's tone gets a lot better when he gets to the Tonemaster, so you can skip the opening sequence with just the Vox AC30. Would love to own the guitar, and find the perfect combination of overdrive and amp to dial in the tone just right. Anyway, still dreaming about finding the best 60's SG, and since I don't own a '64, am a little envious of those who actually own one. Of course, the "best" is always subjective, and with tone, you also have to include both the humbucker and P90 examples, which means you have to own an SG with each pickup type. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 11
Thanked 41 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: 1964 Gibson SG for $17,500
Quote:
As to what the best year of SG is, well, thats subjective. There is no right or wrong answer. Personally, I like the sidepull trem. I don't have any tuning issues with it and I just think it looks way cooler than the Lyre. I also don't mind the thinner necks of the 60, 61 and 62. My personal favorite SG would a 62 with the short Ebony Block tail piece (OK, so I'm a little biased ) or the side pull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Originally born in Dallas,TX. Now living in Rome, IT
Posts: 1,336
Thanks: 31
Thanked 167 Times in 28 Posts
|
Re: 1964 Gibson SG for $17,500
I agree with Kev. Commercial statements are what they are.
This guitar DOES sound amazing, however, many SGs do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: stage left
Posts: 3,876
Thanks: 171
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: 1964 Gibson SG for $17,500
I played a pretty sweet '62 SG with the ebony block tailpiece earlier this week. They were asking a cool $20K.
![]() Even at those prices it's getting harder and harder to come by "no excuses" early SGs.
__________________
A bunch of Strats, some Gibsons, a couple clonewheels, a few Fender amps, various stompboxes Posted from MyLesPaul.com App for Firebird X |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 11
Thanked 41 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: 1964 Gibson SG for $17,500
Ebony Block models are pretty rare and the asking prices are usually higher on them if they are clean no issues guitars. But still, asking price and selling price are two different things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,541
Thanks: 132
Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts
|
Re: 1964 Gibson SG for $17,500
Quote:
__________________
#ForNico |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|