![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
My S.G.
I posted this on a different page, but it is at home here I think.
This is my SG, handed down to me from my father, it is the best guitar i've ever played, it's my Pearly Gates! Ive tried loads of other sg's, none ever come close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 11
Thanked 39 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: My S.G.
Quote:
I have no idea which trem was original to my guitar though. My thought was that the side pull was removed and a B7 installed probably soon after the guitar was purchased new out of necessity because the sidepull is a huge pile of crap functionally speaking. And then the sidepull was probably put back on later after the guitar became valuable (but before it suffered its issues). But who knows.... maybe the Bigsby was original??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: My S.G.
Cripes....here we go....
The neck is maple, it got smashed 3 times during it's years on the road, the third time was almost game over. The chAnge of wood and the weight of the bigsby actually balanced the guitar out. One tone and one volume knob was replaced. the tree of life logo has gone from the headstock. old tuners were replaced with grovers in about 74 I think. This is one of the few SG's I have seen with a B7, Andrew Stockdale (Wolfmother) plays another This guitar was bought in 71, the bigsby was already on it. Chances are, it originally has a sideways Vibrola. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,838
Thanks: 11
Thanked 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: My S.G.
61:
I'm almost 100% sure your 61 came from the factory with a side pull trem. Do you happen to still have it? As you say, the side pulls were and are musically crap (and I believe that having the rear of the strings attached to a spring loaded attachment is a tone sucker, too.) And the lower pot metal arms have had a bad habit of breaking. And a couple of questions. As to the "tree of life" logo on the headstock being gone, are there indentations where it used to be? And you say the neck is MAPLE (not mahogany)? This is the first early SG I have ever heard of with a maple neck, if the neck is original.
__________________
'62 Gibson LP SG Standard '09 Epi Goldtop LP P 90 Two Carvins Custom Strat Electra Strat type Hondo Longhorn Durango Guitar Works "Contender" (ask me about this one!) Sterling SUB AX3 (ask me about this one too) PRS SE "Orianthi" Genz Benz El Diablo 60 TS. Bugera V22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: My S.G.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: My S.G.
The guitar must of had a sideways vibrola, no I do not have it. The tree of life logo was lost when the guitar was smashed for the 3rd time in 75, a new headstock face was put on and the tree of life logo was not included in the repair.
The maple neck was a replacement, after it was smashed the 3rd time as well. This guitar has done a lot of gigs...... Here is one of them and here is the guitar on the O G W T |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,838
Thanks: 11
Thanked 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: My S.G.
Your Dad was a great player. Even through my cheap computer speakers, I can hear the greater tone definition the maple neck gives. I've always felt that the 61 (and early 62) SGs have a problem as the bodies are thin, as are the necks, and made of mahogany which is not a particular dense and heavy tone wood. (And not very strong either, as your Dad and many others discovered the hard way.) I strongly suspect that the maple replacement neck, while hurting collectors' value, actually increases this guitar's musical value.
Someday, I will have a luthier friend of mine build me a true custom guitar. We've talked about it, and it will be shaped much like a 61 SG -- except the fretboard will be narrower as I have small hands. But it will have a maple neck (maybe a neck-through) with a thicker body made of denser wood than mahogany. Cost quote is $1800, so it will be a while. But hearing the tone your Dad got out of an SG with a maple neck reinforces my theories that a "denser" SG would be worth going for.
__________________
'62 Gibson LP SG Standard '09 Epi Goldtop LP P 90 Two Carvins Custom Strat Electra Strat type Hondo Longhorn Durango Guitar Works "Contender" (ask me about this one!) Sterling SUB AX3 (ask me about this one too) PRS SE "Orianthi" Genz Benz El Diablo 60 TS. Bugera V22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 11
Thanked 39 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: My S.G.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cape Town, South Africa (Yes. It's a real country)
Posts: 790
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: My S.G.
Wow. He played some awesome slide guitar. Great voice. And a seriously hip looking dude too.
And that SG sounds the bollocks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|