![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
which year is jimmy pages #1 les paul? ive heard its very simaluar to a 58' but has 59' features?
__________________
own: Jackson RR24m in black W/white beveles (Alexi) Gibson Les Paul Studio in wine red W/chrome Aria acoustic Marshall JCM 800 2203 Marshall mg100hfx wants: Gibson Les paul R9 Fender Stratocaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 2,942
Thanks: 318
Thanked 109 Times in 43 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
i think its a 58 could also be a 59 its a big myth and alot of rumours going round
__________________
Proud user of: Tone-Mojo Wiring Proud user of: Toms Short Pickups Proud user of Zhang Pickups |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
yeah but i heard that gibson took a look at the inside and found 59 features, again only rumors...............
__________________
own: Jackson RR24m in black W/white beveles (Alexi) Gibson Les Paul Studio in wine red W/chrome Aria acoustic Marshall JCM 800 2203 Marshall mg100hfx wants: Gibson Les paul R9 Fender Stratocaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,483
Thanks: 34
Thanked 61 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
when gibson examined it to make the replicas, they said it was a 59. it could be an early 60 though. its not a 58 because it had a double white PAF in the bridge.
__________________
For the humor impaired, all sarcasm will now be highlighted in purple. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
sides, did the 58 even come in plus top?
__________________
own: Jackson RR24m in black W/white beveles (Alexi) Gibson Les Paul Studio in wine red W/chrome Aria acoustic Marshall JCM 800 2203 Marshall mg100hfx wants: Gibson Les paul R9 Fender Stratocaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,483
Thanks: 34
Thanked 61 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
????
maybe you are thinking that 58s were plain tops because the 58 reissues are plaintops? gibson made 58s with various degrees of figuring. there was no "plus top" then.
__________________
For the humor impaired, all sarcasm will now be highlighted in purple. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
__________________
own: Jackson RR24m in black W/white beveles (Alexi) Gibson Les Paul Studio in wine red W/chrome Aria acoustic Marshall JCM 800 2203 Marshall mg100hfx wants: Gibson Les paul R9 Fender Stratocaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,483
Thanks: 34
Thanked 61 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
no worries, my friend. we all started somewhere.
i highly suggest buying a copy of The Beauty of the Burst. Very informative and lots of pics of tasty Bursts.
__________________
For the humor impaired, all sarcasm will now be highlighted in purple. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
THX ill do that, i love the classics...
im going with gibson on that its a 59'. only joe walsh would really know from purchasing it in the first place.
__________________
own: Jackson RR24m in black W/white beveles (Alexi) Gibson Les Paul Studio in wine red W/chrome Aria acoustic Marshall JCM 800 2203 Marshall mg100hfx wants: Gibson Les paul R9 Fender Stratocaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Thanks: 12
Thanked 170 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
there were other features that Gibson looked at to confirm it is a 59. His #2 is also a 59. The 58 myth started in the mid to late 70s with a misquote of Jimmy in a magazine article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,001
Thanks: 444
Thanked 399 Times in 56 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Hypothetically speaking...
If Pages #1 was in fact a 1960 Les Paul - would that increase the value of all the other '60 LPs and bring down the cost of the '59s? Funny if the true holy grail all these years is actually a 1960 LP.
__________________
My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: U.S.A., Edinburgh, Auvergne France
Posts: 336
Thanks: 5
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
Its not a possibility so no use pondering that thought. ![]() Both his #1 & #2 are 59's. His black custom was a 1960 customized, that guitar was stolen in 1970.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: School holidays - so I'm somewhere with the kids
Posts: 778
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Not again!
As far as anyone can say with any certainty (the serial # being missing) it is a 1959. Only one person with direct access to the guitar has ever claimed it was a '58. That was Tim marten who was Page's tech in the 1980s - a long time after the guitar was originally bought from Joe Walsh, and not someone that I've ever heard described as a "burst expert". Marten said it in print twice & the rumours have never died down since... However: Page has only ever said it's a '59. Walsh said it was a '59. Gibson say it's a '59. The collected & combined opinions of countless LP experts from all over the world (admittedly only looking at photos) say that it's a '59. Let this one die the death that it should have done... |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: School holidays - so I'm somewhere with the kids
Posts: 778
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
'59s are sought after for what they are, not because of JP's guitar. Amongst the real burst collectors #1 is thought of as a bit of a dog. It's an iconic guitar because of Page, but if someone else had owned it, it wouldn't be one of the most revered bursts by a looooooooong way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Epi Verification Expert
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kraut territory (Germany)
Posts: 13,761
Thanks: 153
Thanked 50 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Hey Tyrack, in case you have missed Bobbo's 'Jimmy Page ... History of his Guitars !!!' thread, check this site out.
Jimmy Page: The Gear - Home |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,001
Thanks: 444
Thanked 399 Times in 56 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Sorry, but I have to disagree with this. They're not sought after for what they are - they're sought after because of the people who played them. Let's be honest here, if a handful of now legendary guitarists didn't pick these guitars up in the mid '60s, the Gibson Les Paul electric guitar would be one for the history books. You can't tell me they're worth a king's ransom because they're rare. A 1979 Gibson Flying V 2 is rare, how much are those worth? Not much, let me tell you...
__________________
My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 2,942
Thanks: 318
Thanked 109 Times in 43 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Page did not shave the neck he says it came that way on it, this might clear some things up,
__________________
Proud user of: Tone-Mojo Wiring Proud user of: Toms Short Pickups Proud user of Zhang Pickups |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Climbing Silver Mountain, Colorado
Posts: 24,368
Thanks: 162
Thanked 319 Times in 46 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Thanks: 12
Thanked 170 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Thanks: 12
Thanked 170 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: jimmy page #1 58' or 59'?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jimmy Page #1 and Jimmy Page #2 signature Les Pauls | JimmyAce2006 | Historics & Reissues | 11 | 10-13-2009 03:13 AM |
| Jimmy Page vs Jimmy Page the Poll???? | jonesy | The Backstage | 35 | 07-11-2009 10:22 PM |
| Jimmy Page Mod | gw1980 | Gibson Les Pauls | 3 | 03-31-2009 05:46 AM |
| How will Jimmy Page #2 affect the value of Page #1? | JimmyAce2006 | Historics & Reissues | 20 | 02-14-2009 08:15 AM |
| Jimmy Page LP | Drave | eBay Deals | 7 | 03-23-2008 03:30 PM |