My Les Paul Forums
Homepage - Sponsors - Perks - Auctions - Advertise

Go Back   My Les Paul Forums > The Les Paul > Vintage Les Pauls
  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2008, 07:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Modified 1952 Les Paul

Hi guys I am a newbie here. I am in Europe and own a '52 pre-serial number Les Paul. It was renecked at Gibson in 1973 with the modern neck angle + TOM installed. I have the 73 factory repair bill with it. It was sanded blank at the time, and recently redone in all gold nitro as it was originally, based on the paint found in back cavities. Half of the parts are 52 (like the neck pickup, tuners); the other half 73 (pickguard, bridge pickup etc).

It sounds killer and is the lightest example of a Les Paul I have ever held old or new at 7 1/2 lbs. It is a terrific player but I must say I havent got a clue to Gibsons. I tried to sell it on ebay in the UK for what I had in it (3750 pounds), but nobody placed a bid. So what would you all figure its current value ?

Other opinions ? Would it be wise to send it back to Gison or maybe someone else for a more period correct looking neck or other repairs / mods that could make it look more period correct / valuable ?

I do own other vintage guitars (Fender, Gretsch) but this is my first Les Paul. So far I love it - but it is very different in feel from what I usually play. The P90s are pure heaven for what I do (rockabilly/ c&w / swing). Not sure if I should sell it or keep it.

Any advice would be appreciated, here, or at my email fws6@hotmail.com

Thanks !!!!


Last edited by Fws6; 02-12-2008 at 11:08 AM.
Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Les Paul

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums
   
Old 02-12-2008, 12:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
dwagar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: C eh? N eh? D eh?
Posts: 4,961
Thanks: 28
Thanked 51 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

IMO the neck is really holding back the value. To me, it wouldn't have much more value than a '73 Deluxe.

PM or email Mapleflame, IIRC he had a neck made in Russia out of old mahogany for one of his. You'll also need to find a correct fretboard and inlays.

The big question is, how much do you put into it, and will you get more than that out of it if you are just going to sell it?
dwagar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 12:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
shotgunlew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,476
Thanks: 40
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

dude if i had near the money, id buy it, i love the look of that guitar!
__________________
60% of the time...it works every time....

Gun Control = Using Both Hands!!

Everyone Please Pray for Sgt Jeffery Crones and the rest of the boys in iraq! Get some boys!


Chris "The Gunhand" Of the MLP Pirates Crew

1986 Les Paul Jr (Cherry red Singlecut )
1994 MIJ fender Telecaster 52 reissue
1984 JCM 800 1x12 50 watt combo
Behringer 4x12 cab (Bugera speakers)
shotgunlew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 03:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Quote:
To me, it wouldn't have much more value than a '73 Deluxe
Yeah I knew nothing about Les Pauls when I got it, but what I understood from the reactions on my ebay auction is that it is especially the neck that puzzeled potential buyers. The bad thing about ebay is that you can only shop with your eyes not with your ears. But when you talk 'tone' that would be mostly determined by the old body wood right ?

I compared this in a music store with a new reissue goldtop with P90s (it was called the historic model if that makes any sense). This one sounded much warmer, richer in harmonics. The store owner was very eager to sel me the reissue at first saying it was just as good as the old ones. But after comparing he agreed better to stick with an old one.

Maybe it was also in the setup or so, but the reissue to me seemed to be 'voiced' at the factory for use with some kind of distortion pedal, it was very tight but colorless tone from the P90s.

Quote:
if you are just going to sell it
That is the second big issue in my question. Should I, or should I not. It definately sounds fantastic, but all except one of my other guitars are hollowbodies. I just dont play it that often.

Quote:
dude if i had near the money, id buy it, i love the look of that guitar!
Thanks for the compliment ! Even if you did, vintage guitars are 20-30% more expensive here at least compared to the USA because of high shipping and import charges. It would be no use shipping it back to the USA especially with today's low dollar exchange rate.

I bought it as a player, wouldnt necessarily have to make money on it as long as I can get back 90% from what I put in or so.
Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 03:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
LoKi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 109
Thanked 18 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via MSN to LoKi
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Personally I would hang on to it for life. Maybe find some vintage correct parts to get her back to normal, but then I would still keep it and hand it off to my children or their children. The longer you keep it, the more valuable it will become.

Todays vintage market is not in fear of crashing like it did in the 80's. There are more people out there with an appreciation *and with money* than ever before. The US might hit a recession, but that just means more guitars may come up for sale... But the market will bouce back. They simply are not making anymore of these.
__________________
www.youtube.com/LoKi6922

LoKi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 03:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master Luthier V.I.P.
 
Roman Rist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 17
Thanked 157 Times in 11 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Keep it
__________________
Factories build guitars for profit, Luthiers build them for players

Roman Rist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 09:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Mike60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Reflectorland
Posts: 4,524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

renecked or not,that's a beauty!I would keep it.Probably plays and sounds killer.
Mike60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 09:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
dwagar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: C eh? N eh? D eh?
Posts: 4,961
Thanks: 28
Thanked 51 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

yep I agree, just keep it.
dwagar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 09:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
captain tightpants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orland CA
Posts: 4,768
Thanks: 58
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

So keep it. She's got history.
captain tightpants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master Luthier V.I.P.
 
Roman Rist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 17
Thanked 157 Times in 11 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Having a receipt from Gibson for the re neck job from 1973 is a rarity as well. Yup she is one of a kind.


Roman
__________________
Factories build guitars for profit, Luthiers build them for players

Roman Rist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:02 PM   #11 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
refin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 894
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Keep it---------you'll regret selling her.
__________________
"Play skillfully with a loud noise."
PS. 33:3

MyJams
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...?bandID=330460

"Sometimes you have to gag on fancy before you can appreciate the plain".
refin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master Luthier V.I.P.
 
Roman Rist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 3,616
Thanks: 17
Thanked 157 Times in 11 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I guess the Gods have spoken!

You are keeping her!

Roman
__________________
Factories build guitars for profit, Luthiers build them for players

Roman Rist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
diceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 16,331
Thanks: 308
Thanked 91 Times in 32 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I sure would. (keep it, that is).
diceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 10:11 AM   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Dutch53GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I saw this geet for sale, do you have better pic's of the top?

If you like the guitar don't sell it, it probably worth more to you than it is in the (dutch) market.
Dutch53GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 11:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

hey dutch53 a fellow country man ! I read some of your posts on the 'other' les paul forum but for some reason they wont let me register there with a hotmail account, and that is all I got...

Here's a better pic of the top too. Before the refin it had a really nice maple top with some figure. And the seam was almost perfectly in the middle, whereas most goldtops from what I read apparently have 3 piece or more maple on the tops. Still it was a goldtop originally so thats why I decided to make it gold again. Haar guitars did the work as they are the only place in the netherlands (that I know) still using the original nitro.

I had the guitar appraised by a certified appraiser for 7500 euro's I tried to sell for the 3750 pounds (5300 euro ) and then even dropped a 1000 but still no takers.

I have 14 guitars 12 of which are hollowbodies. I always stayed away from solidbodies (especially LP's) because I didnt like the heavy weight. This one is very light though that is what attrackted to me in the first place.

Anyways after reading all the posts here I might better keep it and see if it grows on me.
Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 11:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Mike60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Reflectorland
Posts: 4,524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFR View Post
Having a receipt from Gibson for the re neck job from 1973 is a rarity as well. Yup she is one of a kind.


Roman
+1...the receipt is provenance.
Mike60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 03:21 PM   #17 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Blues Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hicksville
Posts: 2,134
Thanks: 19
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

wow thats one fine looking geetar. imo being that Gibby made the repairs and you have proof of it, the value although may drop I dont think it will be as bad as you may think.

id think that the refinish would hurt it more than the neck but thats my opinion


at any rate the refinish is georgous and just enjoy it.
if it were me id just crank her up and keep it for life.
Blues Power is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 03:39 PM   #18 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Dutch53GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fws6 View Post
hey dutch53 a fellow country man ! I read some of your posts on the 'other' les paul forum but for some reason they wont let me register there with a hotmail account, and that is all I got...

Here's a better pic of the top too. Before the refin it had a really nice maple top with some figure. And the seam was almost perfectly in the middle, whereas most goldtops from what I read apparently have 3 piece or more maple on the tops. Still it was a goldtop originally so thats why I decided to make it gold again. Haar guitars did the work as they are the only place in the netherlands (that I know) still using the original nitro.

I had the guitar appraised by a certified appraiser for 7500 euro's I tried to sell for the 3750 pounds (5300 euro ) and then even dropped a 1000 but still no takers.

I have 14 guitars 12 of which are hollowbodies. I always stayed away from solidbodies (especially LP's) because I didnt like the heavy weight. This one is very light though that is what attrackted to me in the first place.

Anyways after reading all the posts here I might better keep it and see if it grows on me.
Thanks, vintage prices suck for modified pieces. There is no good price.
People here don't really care for vintage guitars, they rather buy a custom shop LP.
Keep it and see if it grows on you, if not expect a price between 3000 and 4000 euro's at best.
I'm affraid the dollar won't help you......

Good luck, I hate talking about a guitar like this because it deserves so much better.
Dutch53GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 04:23 PM   #19 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
MIDNIGHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,918
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

she's a keeper for sure
__________________


Actually...

... I'd play for free ...
MIDNIGHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 06:22 PM   #20 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I think it might cost about $1k to have a luthier make you a new neck with the right HS pitch. There's still old Gibson raw neck blanks floating around, but not many with the correct headstock angle. But, a luthier could hand carve you a killer neck, and slap on a brazillian fretboard, but it would still be an issues-guitar for anyone buying it. Every once in a while you find a 50's parts guitar thats been modified to hell, cut in half or water damaged. They might yield a neck, and other parts perhaps.
demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 04:23 AM   #21 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Before the refin was done it had a nice bookmatched maple top with some figure in it. The seam was almost dead center, whereas I just read that these early Les Pauls should have 3 (or more) piece tops ? Is that awkward ?

Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 12:34 PM   #22 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
dwagar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: C eh? N eh? D eh?
Posts: 4,961
Thanks: 28
Thanked 51 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I might be wrong, but I don't think many, if any, had 3 pc tops. Later, in the Norlin years, it was quite common.
dwagar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 04:31 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

oops - just shows how much I know
Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 11:24 AM   #24 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Dutch53GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

Hi FWS6 do you have any more pre-haar pictures?
Dutch53GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 04:12 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I found your email address and sent two photo's that is all I have...

(I also sent you a PM in case you do not get the email)

Last edited by Fws6; 02-18-2008 at 10:53 AM.
Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 12:49 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
nwobhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 745
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

That's cool, my 54' has a center seam top almost with a little flame. It was refinned by a friend of mine before I got it. He has a 60' That is the same color so, he had the 54' that was stripped, refinned the same color. If I ever sell it I might have it refinned gold but, for now I just play it.
nwobhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 03:07 PM   #27 (permalink)
Grumpy Old Luthier
 
BCRGreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lemoyne, PA
Posts: 6,977
Thanks: 157
Thanked 733 Times in 96 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

I'd strip it and refin it burst.
__________________
Cool guitars, extreme repairs and brutal honesty.
www.bcrmusic.com
www.grumpyoldmenband.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/unkagreg
BCRGreg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 07:26 PM   #28 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
shotgunlew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,476
Thanks: 40
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

+1

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRGreg View Post
I'd strip it and refin it burst.
__________________
60% of the time...it works every time....

Gun Control = Using Both Hands!!

Everyone Please Pray for Sgt Jeffery Crones and the rest of the boys in iraq! Get some boys!


Chris "The Gunhand" Of the MLP Pirates Crew

1986 Les Paul Jr (Cherry red Singlecut )
1994 MIJ fender Telecaster 52 reissue
1984 JCM 800 1x12 50 watt combo
Behringer 4x12 cab (Bugera speakers)
shotgunlew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:38 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mdr40z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Clinton, Arkansas
Posts: 254
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

keep it for sure, i wish i had every guitar back i ever owned
mdr40z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 07:51 AM   #30 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modified 1952 Les Paul

why refin burst ? to me that seems totally awkward as this type of guitar never came in burst ?

Anyway I tied to get used to it but I am so into my hollowbodies and dont see myself using a solidbody anymore. So I put it on ebay UK & hope that the best offer takes it.... 1952 Gibson Les Paul Standard, vintage, 1956 conversion on eBay, also Gibson, Electric, Guitars, Musical Instruments (end time 22-Jun-08 21:00:00 BST)

probably not worthwhile for americans with the low dollar and all but for someone in europe it might be a good deal as I am letting go for a lot less than I put in it
Fws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My modified Les Paul Faded Studio Honeyburst mfergel Gibson Les Pauls 14 02-05-2009 10:34 PM
Gibson Les Paul 1952 Magazine Ad ashbass Gibson Les Pauls 13 11-14-2007 11:55 AM
1952 Les Paul Carcass jiantmc Member Classifieds 0 08-13-2007 11:52 AM
2005 Gibson Les Paul Studio/ Modified FLICKOFLASH Online Auctions 1 07-08-2007 05:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Find us on Facebook!   Find us on MySpace!   Follow us on Twitter!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Our Network: Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum