![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
First, I'd like to thank mylespaul forums for all the great info I've obtained by just reading some threads. It really has been valuable. Now it's time to start my own.
Basically I'm am/was looking at the Vox AC15VR. On the vox website they talk about the amp. It is a mix of solid state and tube technology. They say: Originally designed for the critically acclaimed Valvetronix modelling amplifiers, the Valve Reactor circuit places a 12AX7 vacuum tube (or “valve”) into the power stage. Known as a dual-triode tube, the 12AX7 is actually two tubes in one. As it happens, the Valvetronix series are modeling amps which are cheaper. I tried on in store set to emulate an AC30 and it sounded pretty nice. On the valvetronix page on Vox's website, they note "Tube-driven VOX Valve Reactor circuit uses a 12 AX7 vacuum tube for true-tube tone" Since they are using the same technology and the same tube, does this mean the AC15VR is essentially the same as the amps in the valvetronix series? Basically (to my relatively untrained eyes) it seems the only difference is the AC15VR has a larger speaker and a lower wattage when compared to the valvetronix series. I've also been thinking about going all the way up to a VOX ac15c1 which is all tube. My only concern with this option is: Is it going to be possible to get great tone at volumes that are not very loud? The seeming advantage with solid state is you can get the full tone (however inferior it may be) at any volume. Thanks so much for your help guys, I wouldn't turn to any other site. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 749
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
Quote:
I find the AC15c1 to be a very satisfying sounding amp at lower volumes. The volume is relatively easy to control, so you can play darn soft or crank it up a bit with ease. I did gig with it once in a small club and it sounded amazing. It is actually one of my favorite amps to play late at night. So, yes, I think it sounds good at low volumes.
__________________
PRS Custom 22, Gibson LP Custom & Gibson LP Studio Gibson LP Traditional , Gibson LP Traditional MS Gibson SG & Flying V, Fender Am.St. Tele & Strat Rickenbacker 360/12 , 360v64, 350v63 G&L Legacy & ASAT "Bluesboy (All Lefties) Amps:Mesa Mini Rectifier 25 Head & Mesa 1x12 cabs, Vox AC15C1, Roland Cube 30X, Mesa TA-15 Head Marshall DSL401,Fender Blues Jr. , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: hastings, uk
Posts: 648
Thanks: 25
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
i found that i can control my tone and volume far easyer on my ac15c1, than i ever could on my ac4tv. imo it sounds sweet whatever volume you have it at
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 14,354
Thanks: 767
Thanked 173 Times in 58 Posts
|
Re: Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
It really isn't even to hard to decently open up an AC15, imo. I've played some, and I own a 15 watt tube amp that I've played at various volumes in various situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
Good to know, I really appreciate the advice. MLP is a quality site. I'll probably break the bank/save up a bit and get the ac15c1.
However, I'd still like to know if the VR and the other valvetronix are basically the same for curiosity reasons only at least. Other random question, anyone Use a Keeley Ds1 Ultra with their Vox Amps? Love those Marshall solos, but really want the vox tones for rhythm and most other items. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sillicon Valley
Posts: 718
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
Quote:
I owned a Valvetronix VT-80+. It was an ok amp, I sold it to get something else (egnater). I also spent 15 mins or so messing around with a AC15vr. I think it sounds better than my VT-80+ did on the AC-15 channel. Maybe the speaker, may be the circuit, I don't know. I have also played various tube AC15's and I think that is the best choice for vox tones unless you can handle the size/volume/weight of an AC-30 (which I can't). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Halmstad, Sweden
Posts: 2,138
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Practical questions about vox ac15vr, ac15c1, and the valvetronix circuit
The AC15 is sweet and works fine in an apartment. Don't get it if you have back problems though... MDF all the way
__________________
"You cannot simply un-listen to Red." - MDGersper on the DGM Live guestbook. kbospeak | On Youtube | Fripperies - chronicling Robert Fripp's guitar equipment from the late 1960's to the present! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| vox, vox ac15c1, vox ac15vr |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|