![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Blues Litigator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec
Posts: 7,905
Thanks: 147
Thanked 809 Times in 169 Posts
|
Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
The acid test for idiots when it comes to older Phaez amps is citing the unused secondaries on the PT that he has clipped as massive safety hazards. They are not able to contact anything nor do they flop around. Now, you know someone doesn't know shit when they think they need to be wrapped when all over the amp there are exposed HT solder joints (as in ANY tube amp) that can kill you with the amp off! Bottom line, don't screw around in there.
(Edit: removed heater comment. Ed's right. elevated ac -not DC. My bad) Same guy complained about the filter caps being close together. Some of the greatest amps ever made use multi-section caps and you don't get any closer than that. Glued in caps, I had my doubts myself but it seems quite solid. Probably more so than some filter caps held in by dubious solder joints on the - side. My only complaint there would be hard to swap out down the road. Chassis, give a me friggin' break. My aluminum and wood chassis is as solid as any other amp I have and more so than most. You can't twist that thing at all. The most important safety factor once designed properly is grounding. Don't forget that.
__________________
![]() Last edited by LPV; 04-04-2012 at 05:32 AM. |
|
|
|
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to LPV For This Useful Post: |
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 8,044
Thanks: 331
Thanked 49 Times in 14 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Nice! Too bad the critics have abandoned skepticism. They know everything already. God bless Google Images.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey, England.
Posts: 1,060
Thanks: 20
Thanked 42 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
I don't believe Randy uses DC heaters, he usually just elevates them from what I've seen. You are more likely to get heater hum induced into the signal from the filament itself onto the cathode. Elevating the heater voltage helps to reduce this diode effect. As long as you don't run your heater wires right next/parallel to very sensitive signal wires it doesn't really seem to matter if they are twisted, and having built several high gain builds with the Soldano style heater bus approach i've never had issues with heater hum (and not all of those were elevated either).
__________________
Paul Edwards. See my site for info on all of my amp builds including my supplier list and useful learning resources etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: where the devil don't stay
Posts: 6,990
Thanks: 208
Thanked 236 Times in 65 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
dummies?
count me in finally a thread just for me this is the best day ever
__________________
[SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Blues Litigator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec
Posts: 7,905
Thanks: 147
Thanked 809 Times in 169 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
You could be right Ed. I went back and took another look at an older schematic for the Daisycutter.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Connecticut Yankee in Queen Charlotte's Court
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 40
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Eddy, based on the various gut shots available do you see any major safety hazards with Randy's recent work? I want a builders input, to put this to bed once and for all.
__________________
Phaez JTM 18+ Scumback H75 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The Most Interesting Place in the South
Posts: 267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
No kidding. I read LPV's post 3x and still have no clue. But I have no interest in poking around under the hood of a Phaez amp. I did fantasize the idea of mixing and matching NOS tubes, based on some stuff Rich Rockinghorse posted, but I'm having second thoughts about that now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Newport News VA
Posts: 1,042
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Or for that matter anything that would negatively impact tone or generate noise?
__________________
Guitars: 2009 Gibson LP Traditional (Light Burst) 2000 Fender Strat (Black) 1933 Gibson L-00 Couple other cheap acoustics Amps: Phaez JTM 18 Phaez AFD 18 (In Transit) ![]() Blackheart BH5H (Twang Modified) Fender HRDLx (Omega Modified) “I love scotch. Scotchy scotch scotch. Here it goes down, down into my belly.” — Ron Burgundy |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 9
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
I think I saw a recent board (phaez-made DC10) with the HV secondaries soldered to diodes that were hanging off the turret board. Safety concern?
__________________
1997 Schecter Traditional, ESP Ltd
Traynor Mark 3, Phaez Daisycutter 10, HG18 Denogginizer Barber Launch Pad, Super Sport, Ltd v2 with mod board |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 9
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
I'm not sure it is that clear cut, i.e., whether you can hang stuff off the board correctly or incorrectly. My own preference is to have secure mechanical connections on both sides whenever possible. Things do not have to look neat and parallel, but I do worry when things appear to lack a secure mechanical connection.
__________________
1997 Schecter Traditional, ESP Ltd
Traynor Mark 3, Phaez Daisycutter 10, HG18 Denogginizer Barber Launch Pad, Super Sport, Ltd v2 with mod board |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ogacihc
Posts: 422
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
__________________
"This light is not my own..." Phaez JTM18/Jackal Phaez 10w Daisycutter '78 Fender Vibro Champ '11 Les Paul Traditional '93 Les Paul Studio |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,261
Thanks: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Not this prototype picture thing again... LOL!
Who gives a shizzle... I just peeled paint off the walls with my JTM 25 on the weekend! You either get it, or you don't.... You can't open a closed mind, even with a can opener.... Alex B is kicking ass with these amps on tour, Rosco is using them to make middle aged bra-less ladies dance their asses off at backwoods barbecues and juke joints, and I peel paint off walls with them. At the end of the day, we are all happy and will likely buy another because they sound that good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey, England.
Posts: 1,060
Thanks: 20
Thanked 42 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
The thing with point-to-point style builds is that your components aren't often anchored both sides, but this doesn't necessarily make them unsafe. PTP layouts can be very rigid structures. I like to use a tag strip to anchor one side of the components to help with this. One thing I don't like about the picture above is the amount of wire used - perphaps a more efficient layout would minimise this, but then again the layout has likely been tuned by Randy to minimise noise etc. Really a circuit should be judged by it's performance, not it's looks.
__________________
Paul Edwards. See my site for info on all of my amp builds including my supplier list and useful learning resources etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 9,580
Thanks: 766
Thanked 210 Times in 26 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
I noticed this thread earlier, and I was wondering what had pissed yall off!
I see a couple things in Coldengray's pics upthread that I wouldn't personally like to see inside one of my stage rigs, but it's my understanding that Phaez is able to build amps to spec, and charge accordingly, right? I'd love to see some gutshots of a Phaez turretboard build, anybody got one?
__________________
"The time I burned my guitar it was like a sacrifice. You sacrifice the things you love. I love my guitar. Music is my religion."~Jimi Hendrix Lefty Phillips on Facebook ...and on ReverbNation Happy Hour w/Gabe Nelson Walkin Out w/DB Miller Addiction w/Gabe Nelson (video) Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Surrey, England.
Posts: 1,060
Thanks: 20
Thanked 42 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
As for gluing caps, that's something i've done myself. Typically they are held in place anyway by the structure they are soldered too, but the glue just stops them from vibrating etc. Again with a point to point layout you don't always have a traditional board/location for mounting larger caps. Another very good point made by LPV is grounding. The safety ground that connects the IEC ground to the chassis will ensure that even if the amp were to take a bash and something shorted out to the chassis that it would find it's path to ground here safely, rather than being a risk to the user.
__________________
Paul Edwards. See my site for info on all of my amp builds including my supplier list and useful learning resources etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 9,580
Thanks: 766
Thanked 210 Times in 26 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
![]() I still don't like it myself, but I'm also well aware it has more to do with form than function. I have a similar attitude towards PCBs, which have been in use since the early 20th century, and some of those old ones still work!. ![]() People are concerned with safety issues? I'm not a builder, but it's a pretty straightforward deal, and I don't see the problem.
__________________
"The time I burned my guitar it was like a sacrifice. You sacrifice the things you love. I love my guitar. Music is my religion."~Jimi Hendrix Lefty Phillips on Facebook ...and on ReverbNation Happy Hour w/Gabe Nelson Walkin Out w/DB Miller Addiction w/Gabe Nelson (video) Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ass-deep in alligators, tryin' to drain the swamp.
Posts: 54,308
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 687 Times in 79 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
That thread over at UGh was just pathetic. Much more heat than light.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
...on the Nightrain
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Down Under
Posts: 4,549
Thanks: 69
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
__________________
"The pleasure is to play, it makes no difference what you say." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Christ... I just took a look back at that "JCM-1 vs. Phaez" thread which lead me to the UG thread... What a fvcking mess.
It makes me wonder what Randy would think reading those "criticisms" (aside from "what a bunch of morons ") and responding to them in a well-mannered and reasoned fashion to defend his work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ass-deep in alligators, tryin' to drain the swamp.
Posts: 54,308
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 687 Times in 79 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
I too don't have a dog in this hunt, but it's interesting to see how these things (read: shitstorms) play out over the Internet sometimes - through a relatively objective lens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Blues Litigator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec
Posts: 7,905
Thanks: 147
Thanked 809 Times in 169 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
I don't think it would pass modern certification, true. But do I personally think its dangerous? It comes down to how good that solder joint is and how much mass vs. inertia is involved. But you have to assess that for yourself. I'm fine with mine. One safety hazard that I caught with the woody chassis mounts was this: I built a metal headshell for mine originally. To avoid any shock hazard and noise I ran a wire securely grounding the chassis to the shell.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Newport News VA
Posts: 1,042
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Answers to Phaez criticisms for dummies
Quote:
__________________
Guitars: 2009 Gibson LP Traditional (Light Burst) 2000 Fender Strat (Black) 1933 Gibson L-00 Couple other cheap acoustics Amps: Phaez JTM 18 Phaez AFD 18 (In Transit) ![]() Blackheart BH5H (Twang Modified) Fender HRDLx (Omega Modified) “I love scotch. Scotchy scotch scotch. Here it goes down, down into my belly.” — Ron Burgundy |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|