![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Neverwhere, CA
Posts: 26,017
Thanks: 1,092
Thanked 1,459 Times in 311 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
I think at this point...I'd honestly rather kick down for a reworked Peavey amp vs. a another Marshall at this point. The more horror stories I hear about anything made JCM2000 to the present the more I'm convinced it's time to seriously consider alternatives. (The guy gave Mesa Boogie really high marks even though he didn't like the sound of 'em as far as maintenance and amps with no problems. Fender amps are probably still some of the best amps..even if some of the smaller ones overheat...they're also a bitch to lug around. .....but it's tough to pass on one of these...especially for the price. Especially for the size. 30 watts of tubage is about damned near perfect for most clubs. )
__________________
![]() Musical Ventures: Love Knuckle on Reverb Nation! Random Recordings and Videos of Stuff! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 361 Times in 153 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
as far as the Peavey goes, its my first tube amp, so i cant really compare it to anything worthwhile, but i really, really like it. it seams like it was put together with care. the clean and dirty channels are very nice but yould probably need a pedal for high gain metal but its perfect for RATM like riffs. if you play blues too, its killer. i switch to my neck PU, roll back the volume and it just sings like a mofo. the suckers pretty small but it gets nice and LOUD. i spend hours just screwing around cause it sounds so good and i hear if you switch out the speaker, it really comes to life. i cant imagine
__________________
Gibson Les Paul Studio Peavey Classic 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Neverwhere, CA
Posts: 26,017
Thanks: 1,092
Thanked 1,459 Times in 311 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
)It has a VPR switch which cuts output by 50%....but the Classic 30 takes up less real estate. They've pretty much got that Marshall tone dialed in, too. ![]() Here's a clip of the Marshall. I'm not a metal guy...so it's right up my street. (I may use somethin' like a Digitech overdrive with it if I want to get a super dirty lead...otherwise...I'll be good to go. )
__________________
![]() Musical Ventures: Love Knuckle on Reverb Nation! Random Recordings and Videos of Stuff! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,917
Thanks: 7
Thanked 186 Times in 41 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
The Classic 30 doesn't need a standby switch. For that matter, no guitar amp needs a standby switch. You get an old 700+V Ampeg bass amp, sure, that needs a standby switch.
But cathode stripping isn't going to happen to any tube guitar amp. And in many amps where a standby is poorly implemented will cause a current surge that can hurt a tube. A well implemented standby can be nice, but it's not necessary. You shouldn't pass on an amp because it lacks a standby.
__________________
Lyle Caldwell Psionic Audio High quality audio effects, professional amplifier services, and custom audio solutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Neverwhere, CA
Posts: 26,017
Thanks: 1,092
Thanked 1,459 Times in 311 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
And nope...I'm not an amp tech. Just a player.
__________________
![]() Musical Ventures: Love Knuckle on Reverb Nation! Random Recordings and Videos of Stuff! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 361 Times in 153 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
o well, i enjoy it
__________________
Gibson Les Paul Studio Peavey Classic 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,118
Thanks: 675
Thanked 152 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 675
Thanks: 12
Thanked 64 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
But I just sold my Classic 30 (I know, I know - blasphemy - but it was to help fund my new Traditional Pro at the time) which was literally like brand new for $400. So that guy got a great deal. But yeah - great workhorse of an amp for sure and mega loud.
__________________
![]() Gear: - '08 Gibson Les Paul Standard - '09 Gibson Les Paul Traditional Pro - '09 Epiphone Zakk Wild Bullseye LP - '06 Martin D-16R - '07 Little Martin - Marshall JMP-1C - Marshall Class 5 - Marshall DSL401 - Egnater Tweaker 15 - VOX Valvetronix VT20+ - Yamaha THR-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,917
Thanks: 7
Thanked 186 Times in 41 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
__________________
Lyle Caldwell Psionic Audio High quality audio effects, professional amplifier services, and custom audio solutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,118
Thanks: 675
Thanked 152 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Thanks Lyle. I just hit the bypass on my tuner and leave the amp on. I figured turning it on and off 4-5 times during the night was probably more wear and tear than leaving it idle and powered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() |
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
Still love my Classic 30. I pair it with the Classic 112e extension speaker, and it's ridiculously loud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,405
Thanks: 5
Thanked 188 Times in 59 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,762
Thanks: 5
Thanked 22 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
I hear lots of bitching around here about prices of USA-built gear going up every year, and I hear lots of moaning about manufacturing going overseas. Well, if we want stuff built here in the US, and we want our fellow Americans to get raises (to at least cover inflation, if nothing else) and health coverage and all the other benefits associated with employment in this country, then we have to accept higher prices every year. So which do we want? The pride of "Made in the USA" or the prices of "Made Overseas"? We can't have both.
__________________
![]() Les Paul Standards: 1999 Ebony, 2005 CR7 Goldtop, 2008 VOS R8 Tobacco Sunburst Les Paul Customs: 1993 Transparent Black (over flame maple top), 2004 Alpine White Other Gibsons: 2012 50th Anniversary "Standard 24" SG, 2005 SG '61 Re-issue, 2002 ES-333 Click here for the full-size group photo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,543
Thanks: 23
Thanked 50 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
I just recently picked up a C30 head. It sounds awesome through my Marshall 1960AV cab!
![]() And I have my trusty old blue suede covered C30 with Celestion V30 speaker: ![]() ![]() My workhorse is my tweed C30 (also with Celestion V30 speaker). I've been gigging this one HEAVILY for a little over a year now: ![]() I'm a huge fan of the Peavey Classic 30!
__________________
Videos of me playing guitar |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,917
Thanks: 7
Thanked 186 Times in 41 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
On the subject of amp prices, while I don't remember the actual price ($200-500 range), a 1964 Twin Reverb in 1964 cost the equivalent of about $3000 in today's dollars.
If you were to buy a US made boutique amp made exactly the same way the 1964 Twin Reverb was built, you would pay, you guessed it, about $3000. For the past twenty years at least, the price of a new Fender Twin Reverb has been about $1400. Despite inflation. The 1990 Twin Reverb was $1400, the 2011 Twin Reverb is $1400. Lots of things have to change over the years to keep the price about the same.
__________________
Lyle Caldwell Psionic Audio High quality audio effects, professional amplifier services, and custom audio solutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,118
Thanks: 675
Thanked 152 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
The rack is removed in this photo while swapping out the blue marvel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Posts: 112
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Here's my take on peavey classic series:
I was living and playing in Dallas in the early 90's and decided I wanted a good new amp, way pre-internet bias. I went into a store and played everything they had, (which granted, wasn't any boutique stuff at that time) and walked out with a Classic 50. I loved it, gigged the crap out of it, recorded with it, got compliments on my tone all the time. Ironically, the peavey logo broke early on so I was always getting guys coming up and asking what it was. And when I told them they'd ask...uh what pedals are you using? NONE! Clean, dirty, blues, country, rock, whatever, just jack a few knobs. Well it was all i used for 5 or 6 years and when I started not liking it, being before web-bias it was also before web-knowledge and I didn't know that the tubes and the speakers might be due to change. I traded it in back here in San Angelo. A soon to be famous guitarist named Henry Garza bought it, and one of the speakers blew a few months later. I have had everything since, and never stuck with one amp that long again. You can get better tone, but the percentage the tone improves is not equal to the percentage the price goes up, IMO! Buy that sucker and keep it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,283
Thanks: 78
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
If you can find a good used one, get the Peavey Delta Blues....very similar to the Classic 30 but with a 15" speaker and trem....pure blues tone and classic rock out of these little gems....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | ||
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() |
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 361 Times in 153 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
"They are no longer Made in the USA"
i bought this brand new from GC about a month ago, it says built in the USA....
__________________
Gibson Les Paul Studio Peavey Classic 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) | |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() |
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
At any rate, at least some Peavey amps are now made in China (I know the Bandits were for quite a while, at least), and possibly in some other countries though I've not personally seen them labeled as such. My only point is that no longer are "Peavey" and "Made in the USA" synonymous...you're going to have to check the amp itself to be certain. Maybe the Classic series are all made here, with some of the other lines shifted elsewhere?Oh, and for the next guy who is going to post a picture of the back of his Peavey amp that says "Made in the USA", yes some apparently are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) |
|
Blues Litigator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec
Posts: 7,925
Thanks: 148
Thanked 814 Times in 169 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Well if you guys want to really nit pick, open it up and you'll find almost all the parts are in fact made in asia. But so are most amp components and its all semantics anyway. I opened up my beloved Jubilee to do a recap only to find most of the on board components were in fact Japanese. Build quality is where its at.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,865
Thanks: 12
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
There's a Classic 30 listed on C/L in my area. He started out at $300 and is down to $240 now. He's says it 5 years old and looks new.
I have been kicking it around after reading all the praise for them, but i really don't want to bring another amp home that i don't need. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,328
Thanks: 88
Thanked 557 Times in 46 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Don't knock Nipponese caps. Or valves, for that matter.
__________________
The sleep of reason brings forth monsters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) |
|
Blues Litigator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec
Posts: 7,925
Thanks: 148
Thanked 814 Times in 169 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
^ Not at all. I have loved the tone and quality of my amp for 24 years now.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) | ||
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,118
Thanks: 675
Thanked 152 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
Its all good. (Feel the love)I just posted my C30 label because being American-made is one of the reasons I opted to buy mine. But in fact you are very correct in your statement about Peavey equipment made in Asia. Here is a quote from the man himself: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 7,441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 361 Times in 153 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Quote:
sorry
__________________
Gibson Les Paul Studio Peavey Classic 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) |
|
The Devil's Advocate
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Neverwhere, CA
Posts: 26,017
Thanks: 1,092
Thanked 1,459 Times in 311 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
I picked mine up today.
![]() It's nice and loud...not sure if I like that Blue Marvel speaker much. The Standby after setup is really cool on this modded one...Instead of a 2 way switch for power he made it a 3-way with the standby in the middle position. Nice tones for what it is. I'll probably be gigging the hell out of this thing at open jams, blues jams, and smaller clubs.
__________________
![]() Musical Ventures: Love Knuckle on Reverb Nation! Random Recordings and Videos of Stuff! |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
Bartlett Retrospec Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,118
Thanks: 675
Thanked 152 Times in 42 Posts
|
Re: so, is the Peavey Classic 30 still a top bang for the buck tube amp
Congrats Sentry.
![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|