![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
Hello all, this is my first post on the forum. Just hoping to get some responces to a dilema I have at the moment lol! Ok so I mainly play blues and classic rock, to occasional heavier stuff, but really I like a good clean tone. Love to play the likes of Hendrix, SRV, Buddy Guy, Neil Young, the Stones, you know you'll have heard it all before!!
So I have played a fender HRD and i really liked the clean tone, wasnt overly crazy about the crunch channel tho, think they sell for around £450 used. I have also played a Marshall Bluesbreaker reissue and have actually still got it at my house, as the person selling gave it to me to play for a while. I cant really make up my mind on this one though (hense why im here!) its a great looking amp and theres something about having a "marshall" i think but I cant seem to get the same glassy clean tones as with the fender (btw i mainly play a strat), this might be because im playing it at low volumes just now in my room...or maybe its just a marshall thing. I have been offered this amp for £450 also, so because it is over half the price cheaper than wat it was new, this is also playing with my head!.......Then theres the peavey classic 30. I've not actually played one but seen some videos on YouTube with folk getting some greaaat tone out of them. SO...Should I...Get the Marshall-because its a Marshall lol...and new was over £1000! or should i look into getting a Fender...or Peavey!!! I would love to hear everyones opinions...Thanks very much |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,187
Thanks: 87
Thanked 105 Times in 24 Posts
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
My BBRI sounds great with a Strat, plenty of clean headroom and glassy as you could want. Needs cranking a bit to stop it sounding too "toppy" in fact (Don't bother with Channel I, go straight for II).
I love the Classic 30, but the Marshall is a better sounding amp. Only reason to go for the Peavey would be the flexibility of the drive channel, and it's better for playing at home. If you play out at all, when the drums kick in you'll be glad of the fullness the Marshall retains at volume. HRD is a bit too mushy on the dirty channel for my liking. I'd go with Peavey for home use, Marshall if you ever get to play loud. And you'll need pedals for the Marshall if you want real dirt of course. Only downside of the BBRI is lugging them in and out of gigs. Marginally less back-ache than with a Twin. Proper, quality amp though... Liam |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
Thanks for the quick reply! yeh i think thats the prob at the moment I've not had it cranked, i've got the feeling it would be worth the wait! Do you link between the two channels at all? Im planning on gettin reverb, fuzz and tube screamer probs. Feel free to suggest any from your experience. Im hoping to be getting into a band soon so, i think this would be the business for that. I think hearing the fenders with reverb sticks in your mind as being kindof glassy, that and hearing people say how good fender cleans are...im prob just making assumptions. Thanks for the input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 75
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
Quote:
__________________
![]() 1963 Silvertone 1449 with the "Amp in case" 1975 Gibson Dove Custom 1998 Ovation Celebrity ???? Fender "parts-o-caster" 2008 Les Paul Traditional 2006 Taylor 314ce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,187
Thanks: 87
Thanked 105 Times in 24 Posts
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(£450 is a good price if it's in excellent condition.) Liam |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
Quote:
Cheers again Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
still unsure, reason being that I do not know when i would be getting into a band so in the meantime i will jammin by myself lol, so something like the peavey might be better for in my room just now im thinking....really like the fender cleans aswell, can anyone recommend any good fender amps, or tell me how to get as close with the bluesbreaker? i mainly play with a strat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Keene, Nh.
Posts: 8,775
Thanks: 134
Thanked 237 Times in 56 Posts
|
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30
Quote:
If you want dirty, just crank the guitar volume from there. These are not set in stone settings, just a starting point.
__________________
"Distortion, bless it's fuzzy woolen socks" Dave Hunter "Yesterdays anger, is the sadness of today" Warren Haynes
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bluesbreaker peavey |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|