Les Paul Forums
Homepage - Sponsors - Subscription - Auctions - Advertise - Spy  

Go Back   Les Paul Forums > Music Gear > The Squawk Box
Click to visit LuthierTalk.com   LIKE MyLesPaul on Facebook FOLLOW MyLesPaul on Twitter
  

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-28-2010, 02:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
bellers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Hello all, this is my first post on the forum. Just hoping to get some responces to a dilema I have at the moment lol! Ok so I mainly play blues and classic rock, to occasional heavier stuff, but really I like a good clean tone. Love to play the likes of Hendrix, SRV, Buddy Guy, Neil Young, the Stones, you know you'll have heard it all before!!
So I have played a fender HRD and i really liked the clean tone, wasnt overly crazy about the crunch channel tho, think they sell for around £450 used. I have also played a Marshall Bluesbreaker reissue and have actually still got it at my house, as the person selling gave it to me to play for a while. I cant really make up my mind on this one though (hense why im here!) its a great looking amp and theres something about having a "marshall" i think but I cant seem to get the same glassy clean tones as with the fender (btw i mainly play a strat), this might be because im playing it at low volumes just now in my room...or maybe its just a marshall thing. I have been offered this amp for £450 also, so because it is over half the price cheaper than wat it was new, this is also playing with my head!.......Then theres the peavey classic 30. I've not actually played one but seen some videos on YouTube with folk getting some greaaat tone out of them.
SO...Should I...Get the Marshall-because its a Marshall lol...and new was over £1000! or should i look into getting a Fender...or Peavey!!!
I would love to hear everyones opinions...Thanks very much
bellers is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Les Paul

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums
   
Unread 10-28-2010, 02:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Liam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,187
Thanks: 87
Thanked 105 Times in 24 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

My BBRI sounds great with a Strat, plenty of clean headroom and glassy as you could want. Needs cranking a bit to stop it sounding too "toppy" in fact (Don't bother with Channel I, go straight for II).

I love the Classic 30, but the Marshall is a better sounding amp. Only reason to go for the Peavey would be the flexibility of the drive channel, and it's better for playing at home. If you play out at all, when the drums kick in you'll be glad of the fullness the Marshall retains at volume. HRD is a bit too mushy on the dirty channel for my liking.

I'd go with Peavey for home use, Marshall if you ever get to play loud. And you'll need pedals for the Marshall if you want real dirt of course.

Only downside of the BBRI is lugging them in and out of gigs. Marginally less back-ache than with a Twin. Proper, quality amp though...

Liam
Liam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-28-2010, 05:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
bellers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Thanks for the quick reply! yeh i think thats the prob at the moment I've not had it cranked, i've got the feeling it would be worth the wait! Do you link between the two channels at all? Im planning on gettin reverb, fuzz and tube screamer probs. Feel free to suggest any from your experience. Im hoping to be getting into a band soon so, i think this would be the business for that. I think hearing the fenders with reverb sticks in your mind as being kindof glassy, that and hearing people say how good fender cleans are...im prob just making assumptions. Thanks for the input.
bellers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-28-2010, 05:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Drew224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 14,389
Thanks: 771
Thanked 173 Times in 58 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

I'd go the Bluesbreaker, provided I could crank it.
__________________

Scarlet White
Drew224 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-28-2010, 06:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
58_Iced_Tea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 75
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liam View Post
My BBRI sounds great with a Strat, plenty of clean headroom and glassy as you could want. Needs cranking a bit to stop it sounding too "toppy" in fact (Don't bother with Channel I, go straight for II).

I love the Classic 30, but the Marshall is a better sounding amp. Only reason to go for the Peavey would be the flexibility of the drive channel, and it's better for playing at home. If you play out at all, when the drums kick in you'll be glad of the fullness the Marshall retains at volume. HRD is a bit too mushy on the dirty channel for my liking.

I'd go with Peavey for home use, Marshall if you ever get to play loud. And you'll need pedals for the Marshall if you want real dirt of course.

Only downside of the BBRI is lugging them in and out of gigs. Marginally less back-ache than with a Twin. Proper, quality amp though...

Liam
Excellent post, Liam!!! Spot on!!
__________________


1963 Silvertone 1449 with the "Amp in case"
1975 Gibson Dove Custom
1998 Ovation Celebrity
???? Fender "parts-o-caster"
2008 Les Paul Traditional
2006 Taylor 314ce
58_Iced_Tea is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-28-2010, 07:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Gtarzan81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 619
Thanks: 89
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

No question. Support your mates, and buy the Bluesbreaker.
Gtarzan81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-28-2010, 08:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Splattle101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,324
Thanks: 88
Thanked 557 Times in 46 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

I agree with Liam.
__________________
The sleep of reason brings forth monsters.
Splattle101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2010, 06:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Liam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,187
Thanks: 87
Thanked 105 Times in 24 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by bellers View Post
Thanks for the quick reply! yeh i think thats the prob at the moment I've not had it cranked, i've got the feeling it would be worth the wait! Do you link between the two channels at all?
It's pretty rare that I link the channels. It gives you a tonal blend, but ultimately doesn't get you a lot more gain.

Quote:
Im planning on gettin reverb, fuzz and tube screamer probs. Feel free to suggest any from your experience.
Sounds like you're looking in the right places. Tubescreamer is great with these. If you want a "Fenderish" overdrive that cleans up with volume roll-off the BD-2 takes a lot of beating, especially with Keeley or Allums mods. I'm not a reverb person nowadays. Plenty of good fuzz pedals out there, DS-1, RAT 2, and Tonebenders all work nicely with this amp.

Quote:
Im hoping to be getting into a band soon so, i think this would be the business for that. I think hearing the fenders with reverb sticks in your mind as being kindof glassy, that and hearing people say how good fender cleans are...im prob just making assumptions.
Yes, they can be. But can turn into a bit of an ice-pick sound as well. The Peavey Classic does classic Fender better than a lot of Fender amps, if that makes sense. I find all of them a little bit weak sounding compared to the BBRI, it's got a lot of mids. I gigged for years with a Strat and a BBRI back in the early 90s, and it's a bit of an undiscovered gem of a combination. Most people just think of the Beano album, and plug a Les Paul into them.

(£450 is a good price if it's in excellent condition.)

Liam
Liam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2010, 09:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
NYPV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Orange Co., NY
Posts: 224
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Bluesbreaker
__________________
NYPV is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2010, 04:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
bellers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liam View Post
It's pretty rare that I link the channels. It gives you a tonal blend, but ultimately doesn't get you a lot more gain.



Sounds like you're looking in the right places. Tubescreamer is great with these. If you want a "Fenderish" overdrive that cleans up with volume roll-off the BD-2 takes a lot of beating, especially with Keeley or Allums mods. I'm not a reverb person nowadays. Plenty of good fuzz pedals out there, DS-1, RAT 2, and Tonebenders all work nicely with this amp.



Yes, they can be. But can turn into a bit of an ice-pick sound as well. The Peavey Classic does classic Fender better than a lot of Fender amps, if that makes sense. I find all of them a little bit weak sounding compared to the BBRI, it's got a lot of mids. I gigged for years with a Strat and a BBRI back in the early 90s, and it's a bit of an undiscovered gem of a combination. Most people just think of the Beano album, and plug a Les Paul into them.

(£450 is a good price if it's in excellent condition.)

Liam
Yeh, I'll check out the pedals you suggested. I have heard a lot of people going on about when Clapton used them etc. Not really interested in that to much. The amp isn't in mint condition, bit tatty at the front, seen a lot of gigs i think. Valves have recently changed with some top end ones so I've been told. Its one of those things though. I've got a lot more chance picking up a peavey or smaller fender cheap for the house later on down the road than one of these i think. Can't wait to get it cranked! lol Gives the impression it will cut through well when playing live, so plenty of positives.
Cheers again

Chris
bellers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-01-2010, 01:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
bellers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

still unsure, reason being that I do not know when i would be getting into a band so in the meantime i will jammin by myself lol, so something like the peavey might be better for in my room just now im thinking....really like the fender cleans aswell, can anyone recommend any good fender amps, or tell me how to get as close with the bluesbreaker? i mainly play with a strat.
bellers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-01-2010, 08:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
rocknhorse1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Keene, Nh.
Posts: 8,775
Thanks: 134
Thanked 237 Times in 56 Posts
Re: Marshall Bluesbreaker v fender HRD v peavey classic 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by bellers View Post
still unsure, reason being that I do not know when i would be getting into a band so in the meantime i will jammin by myself lol, so something like the peavey might be better for in my room just now im thinking....really like the fender cleans aswell, can anyone recommend any good fender amps, or tell me how to get as close with the bluesbreaker? i mainly play with a strat.
That amp should be able to get really nice cleans. I have never owned one, but I think if you were to run the volume to about 5, but roll the volume down on you guitar to about 5, that should be pretty clean. The original JTM45 was basically the Fender Bassman circuit, but using the parts that were available in the UK at the time. I have an 18 watt amp with that circuit, which has way less headroom than the BB, and I get fantastic clean tones. If you want dirty, just crank the guitar volume from there. These are not set in stone settings, just a starting point.
__________________
"Distortion, bless it's fuzzy woolen socks" Dave Hunter

"Yesterdays anger, is the sadness of today" Warren Haynes
rocknhorse1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bluesbreaker peavey

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.


LIKE MyLesPaul on Facebook   FOLLOW MyLesPaul on Twitter

Our Network: Luthier Forum | SG Guitar Forum | Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum | Acoustic Guitar Forum

MyLesPaul proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2006-2013, MyLesPaul.com. All Rights Reserved.