![]() |
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Panama City, Panama
Posts: 8,409
Thanks: 307
Thanked 656 Times in 260 Posts
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
All I know is that Dimarzio makes a good PAF pickup, but the Dimarzio PAF Pro is no totally a PAf
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
I just replaced pickups in my R9. Originally the guitar had classic 57's (which I like very much), but after playing a real 58 side by side with my R9, the pickups didn't have that smooth bite that the real PAF's had. Anyway, I put a BB 2 in the bridge, and a BB 1 in the neck. I got a little closer to the original PAF sound, but I wasn't quite overjoyed. Don't get me wrong, the guitar sounded good with the classic 57's and the BB, but I didn't like the squeel that I get with the un-potted BB's. Anyway, I did a little research, and I got the Dimarzio 36th aniv PAF's (DP223 for bridge and DP 103 for neck). Also, I got a killer deal on them. In my shopping I found a place called Woodwind and Brasswind (wwbw.com). Their prices were on par with everyone else, but they had a 20% off sale,(the discounted price) and free shipping over 100.00! Anyway, I think my total came to 127.00 for both shipped. BTW, I got the cream open coils. I used Dimarzios in my Les Paul's in the 70's, mainly because I thought they looked cool!! Anyway, the open cream coils look great in my R9, but I do like them better than the BB's I had. They don't squeel as much, and they have a nice warm tone, with the PAF bite I like. Anyway, I have only lived with the Dimarzio PAF's for about a month now, but at this point, I really like them. Also, I play heavy blues, classic rock, and some 80's metal through a Mesa MK IV. Anyway, I hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Honduras
Posts: 16,586
Thanks: 2,081
Thanked 900 Times in 238 Posts
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
Quote:
This helps a lot man, thanks. I was wondering about those Dimarzios. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 1,572
Thanks: 28
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
I think he talking about feedback. I am sure BB's I, II and III are unpotted, so there would be a tendency for them to feed back if you are to close to a cranked amp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
Quote:
In guitars they come potted. Burstbucker
__________________
Proud user of "JonesyBlues Customshop" parts ![]() T-Top info read this http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/pick...490r-490t.html Alot of good wiring help http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/tone...g-library.html Help on soldering http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/tone...ow-solder.html Capacitor info http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/tone...apacitors.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada as opposed to Kanata
Posts: 6,152
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: DiMarzio Classic PAF Vs Gibson BurstBuckers II
The new hot shot PAF type out, people are liking very much! Still no where as nice as the org. 59 in the comparision IMO |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|