MyLesPaul.com
Homepage - Sponsors - Subscription - Auctions - Advertise - Spy  
Go Back   MyLesPaul.com > The Les Paul > The Custom Shop > Luthier's Corner
LIKE MyLesPaul on Facebook FOLLOW MyLesPaul on Twitter
  
Like Tree11Likes
  • 1 Post By '59_Standard
  • 4 Post By ihavenofish
  • 1 Post By Cpt_Gonzo
  • 5 Post By Mouse

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-07-2010, 07:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Chris Tramp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stoke-on-trent
Posts: 114
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Mahogany Vs Maple

Hey all, after seeing some of the recent posts about maple and mahogany necks i was under the impression that Mahogany is a more attractive wood to use for the neck?

Then i saw another post that said Mahogany is a cheaper wood than maple...

So, Why are Mahogany necked guitars more sought after and whats the reason? Is Mahogany a better wood for sustain? Or is Maple better?
__________________
'78 LP Custom, Tobbacco
Washburn Nuno Sig
Spear Evil Monkey - Quilted Red (Endorsment Guitar)
Peavey JSX 120 watt Head
Blackstar Artisan 4x12 V30 Slant
'86 Japanese Boss dd-2
Crybaby 535Q
Heil Talkbox
MXR Flanger

http://www.myspace.com/headrushbringiton
Chris Tramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Les Paul

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on MyLesPaul.com
   
Unread 04-07-2010, 07:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ledlover01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 3,519
Thanks: 374
Thanked 115 Times in 44 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Maple is stronger but not as good fo tone. Mahagoney is a very soft wood.
__________________
Proud user of: Tone-Mojo Wiring
Proud user of: Toms Short Pickups
Proud user of Zhang Pickups
ledlover01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2010, 09:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
________Artie________
 
delawaregold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 4,611
Thanks: 209
Thanked 374 Times in 70 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Ted McCarty was the President of Gibson, and his team designed
the Gibson Solid Body Electric Guitar, that went on to become the
Les Paul Model.


__________________
The original "Idiot Savant"
Just because Iím paranoid, doesnít mean itís not happening.
Carpe scrotum
Apparently, I am the Cliff Claven of the MyLesPaul Forum
delawaregold is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2010, 09:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ledlover01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 3,519
Thanks: 374
Thanked 115 Times in 44 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Well i know they made three peice necks in the 70s for strength but people complained about the tone so they changed it back.
__________________
Proud user of: Tone-Mojo Wiring
Proud user of: Toms Short Pickups
Proud user of Zhang Pickups
ledlover01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 01:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 217
Thanks: 0
Thanked 39 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by ledlover01 View Post
Maple is stronger but not as good fo tone.
Yes, those Strats and Strads sound terrible!
Nick59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 12:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
weirdotis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Crossroads
Posts: 5,137
Thanks: 153
Thanked 85 Times in 23 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick59 View Post
Yes, those Strats and Strads sound terrible!
Banjocasters
__________________
-Matt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by k.guitars View Post
Heaven forbid someone show a video of Audley Freed actually playing his Historic. Such nonsense might take away from the riveting conversations about Lifton cases and the tonal variations of glue...
http://matthewbrownmusic.net/
weirdotis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2010, 04:48 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fretout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

I own a Gretsch Jet Pro that is basically a Les Paul with a Maple Neck. When I compared the Gretsch Jet Pro to my Gibson Les Paul Custom, the Gretsch has a much brighter tone and seems to have more "attack", whereas the Gibson has much more depth and "meat" to it's sound.

Also keep in mind that there are several Gibson Les Pauls that have Maple necks (Zakk Wylde Sigs, Raw Power models, ect.).
__________________
2008 Gibson Les Paul Custom (Ebony)
1996 Epiphone Les Paul Special (Silverburst)
MESA/Boogie Mark III Coliseum (Blue Stripe)
MESA/Boogie Mark III (Blue Stripe)
MESA/Boogie Mark IV (Medium Head)
MESA/Boogie Mark IV (Widebody Combo)
MESA/Boogie Dual Rectifier (Revision D Blackface)
MESA/Boogie Dual Rectifier (Revision G Blackface)


fretout is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-12-2010, 01:34 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
'59_Standard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,710
Thanks: 3
Thanked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Tramp View Post
Hey all, after seeing some of the recent posts about maple and mahogany necks i was under the impression that Mahogany is a more attractive wood to use for the neck?
The attractiveness of a piece of wood depends on an Individuals eye.

Take a look on this link and you'll find fantastic looking pieces of Veneer in both Species - its all good imho:

...........Certainly Wood


Quote:
So, Why are Mahogany necked guitars more sought after and whats the reason? Is Mahogany a better wood for sustain? Or is Maple better?
Are they more sought after? Where does this 'fact' come from. Seriously, I've never heard this before. Most people I know buy a guitar for its overall thang, rather than one specific element about it.

If you've read the 'surrounding story' of the Les Paul - as highlighted above- they found a Solid Maple body to be too bright and sustained for far to long. I can't verify the 'sustain' comment from my experience, but I know Maple is somewhat brighter (higher pitched) to my ears. YMMV
truckermde likes this.
'59_Standard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-12-2010, 06:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 6 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

mahogany - hand carves like butter.
maple - hand carves like granite with a heckler calling you a pussy while youre doing it.

thats about the only really difference to me.

maple is also heavier, which can make an instrument neck heavy.
its harder, but also more flexible (usually, its variable and theres a number of "hard" maple species used) so i dont know that it would have all that dramatic a tonal impact. im certainly more concerned with carving and weight than tone differences myself.

oh, and maple is cheap as dirt up here in canada.
ihavenofish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-12-2010, 01:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Cpt_Gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,926
Thanks: 18
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Anyone know how well a maple - bolt on - maple Strat would sound?

A bit off topic here, but as far as I understand that would make a good Combo but would have been expensive back then? No?
Cpt_Gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-12-2010, 01:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JBranch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central GA
Posts: 550
Thanks: 28
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Strats ARE maple. So, it would sound like a Strat. Some variation of sound between a Strat with a maple fingerboard and one with a rosewood fingerboard, the all maple being a bit more bright and the rosewood being a bit warmer.

Or do you mean a maple neck bolted to a maple body?

I think that traditionally a Strat body is alder, or ash, although I do remember that they have a mahogany model.
JBranch is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-12-2010, 03:17 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SkyNet3D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Turnhout, Belgium
Posts: 613
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBranch View Post
Strats ARE maple. So, it would sound like a Strat. Some variation of sound between a Strat with a maple fingerboard and one with a rosewood fingerboard, the all maple being a bit more bright and the rosewood being a bit warmer.

Or do you mean a maple neck bolted to a maple body?

I think that traditionally a Strat body is alder, or ash, although I do remember that they have a mahogany model.
There's more to the strat sound than just the woods used. Jacksons are usually maple necks and alder bodies, and they sound nothing like strats. Hell, even my strat with humbuckers and 500k pots sounds nothing like a strat. A Les Paul with a maple neck should sound brighter than a mahogany necked one, but still not near as bright as a strat.
SkyNet3D is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-12-2010, 03:19 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Cpt_Gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,926
Thanks: 18
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

I meant maple neck bolted onto a maple body.
truckermde likes this.
Cpt_Gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-02-2013, 12:43 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

.

Last edited by georgem7; 12-02-2013 at 03:33 PM.
georgem7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-02-2013, 04:10 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Progrocker111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,493
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Progrocker111
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

I have had many 70s maple neck Les Pauls. They are a bit brighter and more "one dimensional" sounding to me with less mids. Suitable for higher gain cause of the brihter and faster tone.

I definitely prefer mahogany necks.
__________________
My diagnosis is: Hiwatt and Norlinphilia

1972 Gibson Les Paul Custom Cherryburst
1972 Hiwatt DR103, 1972 Hiwatt SE4122
Progrocker111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-02-2013, 04:19 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 292
Thanks: 1
Thanked 57 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by ihavenofish View Post
mahogany - hand carves like butter.
maple - hand carves like granite with a heckler calling you a pussy while youre doing it.
heh

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt_Gonzo View Post
Anyone know how well a maple - bolt on - maple Strat would sound?
iirc, arlo west over at tdpri mentioned he used to have one... his main for years. I remember thinking it'd be heavy for hours on stage.

my caveman talk = maple bright... mahogany warm

I haven't compared directly, but many will say plain flat sawn maple necks sound better than quartered figured necks.
DoneOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-02-2013, 04:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
truckermde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Redwood Empire
Posts: 6,136
Thanks: 514
Thanked 38 Times in 15 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt_Gonzo View Post
I meant maple neck bolted onto a maple body.
I build my basses that way, & they kikass! Pretty heavy, though...




I think the awesome thing about maple necks which makes them head & shoulders above mahogany necks for me, is the absolute stability. I'm a bass player, and a big bear of a man, and I can tend to be a bit heavy handed in everything I do. I sometimes get too much neck flex on
guitars like SGs or Wilshires, which have the neck meet the body further up the fretboard than an LP.

If the SG is a Norlin with a bitchin' 3-piece maple neck, then no problem/ no flex I think my next SG will be the SGJ, as it has a maple neck!
__________________
truckermde is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-02-2013, 05:49 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dalmatia
Posts: 1,502
Thanks: 36
Thanked 31 Times in 7 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Generally speaking maple neck has more upper midrange content, less low midrange, more highs and clear lows. The trick with guitar building is not to concentrate too much on species but to have a nose and ears for tone, no matter specie, some chunks sound like big clear bell, majority of others restricted. Our job is to marry those bells in a way that two or three parties don't cancel each bell out but to stay married in a great harmony.
And that's all folks!
Mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-02-2013, 08:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
MikeSouza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Fort Myers,FL
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Mahogany Vs Maple

Quote:
Originally Posted by ihavenofish View Post
mahogany - hand carves like butter.
maple - hand carves like granite with a heckler calling you a pussy while youre doing it
Hahahaha sad but true
MikeSouza is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Our Network: PRS Guitar Forum | Luthier Forum | SG Guitar Forum | Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum | Acoustic Guitar Forum

MyLesPaul proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2006-2014, MyLesPaul.com. All Rights Reserved.