My Les Paul Forums
Homepage - Sponsors - Perks - Auctions - Advertise

Go Back   My Les Paul Forums > The Les Paul > The Custom Shop > Luthier's Corner
  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2009, 11:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
FLICKOFLASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hagerstown,MD USA
Posts: 14,391
Thanks: 334
Thanked 530 Times in 113 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FLICKOFLASH Send a message via Yahoo to FLICKOFLASH
The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Ok there has been many myths & misconstrued information on the methods & materials used to build in the Golden Era. I do know a lot of false information has been passed down & spread around so much that even though it is false info is accepted as fact. Lucky for us we do have some scientific investigators luthiers amongst our presents & let’s hope they share some of their findings. Many are here hiding in our mist that I consider to be world reknown Guru's of repair & construction of stringed instruments. Some even to the most expensive instruments on earth.
__________________

Last edited by FLICKOFLASH; 10-19-2009 at 12:17 AM.
FLICKOFLASH is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to FLICKOFLASH For This Useful Post:
Alt Today
Les Paul

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums
   
Old 10-19-2009, 12:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Under shop arrest
 
bfcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mountains
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Allow me to pop the top off of the first can of worms.

Yes! I have a myth that I would love to here from the experts on.
Please, please, please straighten out "they used hide glue for the tops" myth.
Necks, finger boards yes. Tops? I don't think so.
I say radio glue (urea formaldehyde resin).
So c'mon experts, let me have it!
bfcg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 770
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Sure Flick I'll play...

1. Brazilian Rosewood fingerboard
2. No wrapped truss rod
3. Quartersawn neck (somewhat)
4. Neck shape and rolled binding
5. Long neck tenon
6. Old Growth forest mahogany, meaning many more rings per inch from a tree that "struggled to grow" causing much denser wood.
7. Hot animal glue joints
8. Urea formaldahyde glued top
9. Alloy tailpiece
10. Long carbon steel studs and anchors
11. 500k PLUS pots
12. Wiring diagram
13. Tempered PAF base plates
14. Inconsistantly produced PAF coil wire
15. Inconsistantly wound PAF coils
16. Hard rock maple top
17. Lightweight Kluson tuners
18. Nitrocellulose laquor with "defective" plasticizers that eventually outgassed, causing the surface to be dense and brittle (and less prone to denting or dinging)
19. Nitrocellulose that was not thinned, rather was heated to a thin enough consistancy to be able to be sprayed.
20. Aniline dye that was effectively "defective" as well.
21. Correct alloy bridge
22. Yellow brass bridge inserts
23. Longer bridge post of different alloy
24. 50 years as a musical instrument
25. Magic pixie dust

let the games begin...

fletch
Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
FLICKOFLASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hagerstown,MD USA
Posts: 14,391
Thanks: 334
Thanked 530 Times in 113 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FLICKOFLASH Send a message via Yahoo to FLICKOFLASH
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

I do know of one expert on this forum who does have the facts. He has a relative who works at a museum & have analyzed the glues, lacquers & plastics .I do hope they chime in a share with us the secrets of the burst.
__________________
FLICKOFLASH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:14 AM   #5 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
FLICKOFLASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hagerstown,MD USA
Posts: 14,391
Thanks: 334
Thanked 530 Times in 113 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FLICKOFLASH Send a message via Yahoo to FLICKOFLASH
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Here is one lil known fact the inlays are inlaided into a radiused route
__________________
FLICKOFLASH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 770
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLICKOFLASH View Post
Here is one lil known fact the inlays are inlaided into a radiused route
Yes the Standards are but the Customs aren't. That was mentioned here a little while ago...

fletch
Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 01:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
LG2
Senior Member
 
LG2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
16. Hard rock maple top
not sure, I was thinking soft but no expert. hard maple is not fun to carve and can sound thin compared to soft.
LG2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 10:34 AM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 73
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Well, you use hard rock maple if you're going to play hard rock, and...
vkennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 08:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
DGNRepair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 213
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by vkennedy View Post
Well, you use hard rock maple if you're going to play hard rock, and...
__________________
Its not a replica, its just under the influence......
DGNRepair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 08:34 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Texas07R8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,220
Thanks: 101
Thanked 70 Times in 16 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

6/6 nylon nut
bakelite covers and pickguard
those magical and insanely priced pickup rings
ABR saddles, what is their true composition?

were all burst tops actually hard rock maple??????

wasn't the TRC made through some extrusion process that rippled the surface slightly as well?

Also, who has the bottom line on those old cases, any history there that's not been talked about much?
Texas07R8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 09:17 AM   #11 (permalink)
Under shop arrest
 
bfcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mountains
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Solid color plastic covers and pick guards laminated multi-ply?
bfcg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 09:18 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 770
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas07R8 View Post
6/6 nylon nut
bakelite covers and pickguard
those magical and insanely priced pickup rings
ABR saddles, what is their true composition?

were all burst tops actually hard rock maple??????

wasn't the TRC made through some extrusion process that rippled the surface slightly as well?

Also, who has the bottom line on those old cases, any history there that's not been talked about much?
Yes, forgot about the nut... I don't believe the covers were bakelite though, although there were rolled from about 7 layers of thinner plastic. I have one and it isn't bakelite as far as I can tell.

The TRC was rolled plastic as well, thus the ripples.

fletch
Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 11:26 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
DoeringerGuitars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Buford GA
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

How about the "Lawsuit" Ibanez guitars touted (Myth) to be an exact replica of a LP? The truth was the lawsuit had to deal with the shape of the headstock ONLY.
I have one of these ($35 at a pawn shop 20 years ago), a lower end 2324 model bolt on, but I love it. I'm refinishing it now back to the original color since someone stripped it a sprayed it black. But it is mahogany topped and backed with a spruce veneer and plays like a dream. Doeringer Custom Guitars and Parts Home Page
DoeringerGuitars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 01:22 PM   #14 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 486
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Unhappy Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Well, here are some facts that I know to be true. The tops on all production 1950's Les Pauls were glued to the mahogany back with phenol formaldehyde glue. Gibson used microwaves to cure this glue both for the Les Paul tops as well as for laminating archtop plates. At least some of the centre joints of the maple tops were glued with urea formaldehyde glue. The neck joint, headstock ears and most fingerboard joints seem to be hide glue and the frets were glued in with a mixed animal glue which replaced shellac. Many 1955 guitars have a random number of pieces of nickel silver hammered into the maple truss rod fillet under the fingerboard! Other years do not seem to have this.
Not all 1950's Les Pauls are made from Honduras mahogany - some are Cedar and some are African woods and not all 1959 - 1960 Gibson Fingerboards are Brazilian Rosewood - some are other South American woods such as cocobolo!
Sgt.Pepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 01:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 486
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by bfcg View Post
Solid color plastic covers and pick guards laminated multi-ply?
The process of making different thickness material was to fuse many layers of thinner material by rolling it together as described here

Darvic | Products | PAR Group

was used for some of the plastics Gibson made backplates and pickguards from but as with everything Gibson, not all the plastics throughout the 50's are even the same type or colour!
Sgt.Pepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 01:30 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N'orlins :D
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 38
Thanked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
Sure Flick I'll play...
19. Nitrocellulose that was not thinned, rather was heated to a thin enough consistancy to be able to be sprayed.
wow really....??
Atomic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 07:22 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Croatia,Italy
Posts: 18
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt.Pepper View Post
Not all 1950's Les Pauls are made from Honduras mahogany - some are Cedar and some are African woods ...
You mean South American cedar(Cederela)? The guy that makes Roukangas guitars claims that cedar is very similar in sound to honduras mahogany.
Nickpastar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 08:12 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gtrmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Very interesting thread and it will be a great thread if those that know come out and play.

I'm not sure about the Cedar myth although I do have some "Spanish Cedar" neck blanks that could easily be mistaken for Honduras Mahogany especially with a red stain on it. Anything's possible!

Flick, when you say "the inlays are inlaided into a radiused route " are you referring to the route depth following the radius of the fingerboard? Also, pleeeeease get your museum contact to participate!
gtrmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 08:22 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N'orlins :D
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 38
Thanked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickpastar View Post
You mean South American cedar(Cederela)? The guy that makes Roukangas guitars claims that cedar is very similar in sound to honduras mahogany.
so is Oak supposedly. i think a lot of woods would sound similar to what is normally "acceptable" tonewood. in fact, i would love to hear a LP type guitar that was made with an oak back and a birch top.. as those woods are supposedly acoustically similar in response to mahogany and maple respectively. im sure there would be a slight difference.. but how big would the difference really be?

im thinking that the majority of difference would be in how the guitar looks moreso than how it sounds..
Atomic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 09:15 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gtrmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Joe, interesting observation, but I think that an oak/birch discussion would be better on a different thread having to do with alternative woods not a discussion on 50's Guitar Construction. Let's please keep the thread on topic as best as possible
gtrmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 09:40 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
zeppelin101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cleveland OH
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

I talked to my local gibson retailer and this man is in his late 60s and LOVES gibson its what hes dedicated his life to. He has a 59 btw. i talked to him cuz i used to take lessons and he keeps bringing up that the proccesses used to makek gibson in the old days were so much more labor and as such produced better results.

I think the hyde glue myth (maybe) is from the fact that til this day high end violins are made using hyde glue and it has a distinctive smell. Now before guitar making became a huge industry i can imagine that a guitar company would use the same methods that had been used for hundreds of years it ust makes sense.
__________________
My vocation is more in composition really than anything else - building up harmonies using the guitar, orchestrating the guitar like an army, a guitar army.
Jimmy Page
zeppelin101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 11:33 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gtrmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
18. Nitrocellulose laquor with "defective" plasticizers that eventually outgassed, causing the surface to be dense and brittle (and less prone to denting or dinging)
Who came up with this doozie of a myth? Outgassing plasticizers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
19. Nitrocellulose that was not thinned, rather was heated to a thin enough consistancy to be able to be sprayed.
I would not doubt that Gibson was doing this because it's documented that other factories like C.F. Martin & Co. was doing this. Heating the lacquer (quite dangerous without the right equipment) eliminated the need for thinning and allowed the heated lacquer to flow out and build a finish in fewer coats.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeppelin101 View Post
I talked to my local gibson retailer and this man is in his late 60s and LOVES gibson its what hes dedicated his life to. He has a 59 btw.
Pictures please!
gtrmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 11:52 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 770
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrmaker View Post
Who came up with this doozie of a myth? Outgassing plasticizers!


Are you a chemist by chance?

fletch
Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 12:39 AM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gtrmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

No, not by chance or design and I wouldn't have it any other way!

I've never heard of plasticizer outgassing. Typically plasticizers are added to achieve a desired amount of flexibility in materials. In my research, plasticizers migrate to the surface and can transfer, but don't outgass. You can google "plasticizer migration" and get all the chemical gobblygook you can stand. This is only a terminology thing as I know where the person was going with it. Once the plasticizers migrate and transfer then the material looses it's flexibility and gets brittle.

Solvents however do outgass.This is why when lacquering, after applying the last coat, I always wet sand the final coat to level it out then let the instrument hang for 15-30 days while the solvent outgasses. If you do not do this then the outer skin of lacquer significantly slows down the solvent outgassing process. This is not critical, but it speeds up the hardening of the lacquer so that you can buff it to a high gloss in a shorter timeframe after shooting the last coat.

Fletch, where are you at in NJ? I'm up north in the West Milford area.
gtrmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 12:53 AM   #25 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
diceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 16,334
Thanks: 308
Thanked 91 Times in 32 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Is this the reason that I would get a "film" on my nitro finished Strat when I would leave it in the sun to fade it? It was strange - you could wipe it right off - but it never happened unless it was laying in the sun/heat.
diceman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 01:32 AM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gtrmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Yes, this sounds like it because plasticizers will migrate to a surface especially when subjected to heat. Different nitro lacquers have different amounts of plasticizer in them. Over the years I found Lawrence McFadden lacquers to be the best out there. Superb gloss with low build thickness. I've tried all of the others out there and they're loaded with plasticizers and take forever to harden so that you can buff to a nice gloss.
gtrmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 04:04 AM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GooCart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Umeå, Sweden
Posts: 879
Thanks: 3
Thanked 26 Times in 5 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

When you talk about heating the unmixed lacquer, what temperature would you think you need? I talked to a guitar builder here in Sweden and he use to put a can of nitro in heated water to make it "softer", but he doesn't use it without thinner.
__________________

Magnus Melkersson, Sweden
GooCart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 04:05 AM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrmaker View Post

I've never heard of plasticizer outgassing. Typically plasticizers are added to achieve a desired amount of flexibility in materials. In my research, plasticizers migrate to the surface and can transfer, but don't outgass

Solvents however do outgass.
Would this one do both - its a Solvent/Plasticizer?

Dibutyl Phthalate



And on Topic: Was the Nylon nut 4/6....or....6/6
Standard_59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 05:35 AM   #29 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 486
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrmaker View Post
Very interesting thread and it will be a great thread if those that know come out and play.

I'm not sure about the Cedar myth although I do have some "Spanish Cedar" neck blanks that could easily be mistaken for Honduras Mahogany especially with a red stain on it. Anything's possible!

Flick, when you say "the inlays are inlaided into a radiused route " are you referring to the route depth following the radius of the fingerboard? Also, pleeeeease get your museum contact to participate!
This is how myths perpetuate. Your mention of a red stain shows you're thinking of bursts. Also, If you're not sure, get out there and look at several hundred 1952 Les Pauls, better still, work on them and you'll smell Cedar used for at least some of them, but AFAIK it was only used for some 1952 Les Pauls. The weight of the cedar ones is also much less.
One of the problems with the internet is that people want to be convinced and it isn't always the truth that presents the most convincing or most logical arguement
Sgt.Pepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 08:02 AM   #30 (permalink)
Member
 
Greco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, England.
Posts: 99
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The Golden Years Myths & Truths of 50's Guitar construction :

I have a whole raft of information but sadly it is all just best guesses and accepted knowledge. I really doubt those that know are ever gonna tell.

One thing I don't quite get yet is the whole formaldehyde glue thing, having never used it. Is heat neccessary for these types of glues to set? How in the hell did Gibson use microwaves to cure the glue without killing anyone? I'm assuming we're not talking about putting the body in a microwave oven for a few minutes either....

Also - hot lacquer: So I stick a can of lacquer in hot water, what's the worst that could happen? At what point would things become dangerous?
Greco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
prime guitar years? leftylover My Other Guitars 4 08-21-2009 02:16 AM
Tube Amplifier Myths Torren61 The Squawk Box 41 05-07-2009 10:50 PM
10 Greatest Rock n Roll Myths jonesy The Backstage 21 04-29-2009 06:00 PM
Solidbodies - 50 years of guitar war circusboy28 The Backstage 15 02-19-2009 01:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Find us on Facebook!   Find us on MySpace!   Follow us on Twitter!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Our Network: Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum