R9 and R8 quality comparison?

ptgold · 02-20-2008, 10:12 AM

Hello everyone,
new to the forum here. I just wanted to know what the essential difference is between the R8 and the R9 that would justify such a difference in price.

I ask because im about to start shopping for an R8 very soon.

Thanks

Darkburst · 02-20-2008, 11:16 AM

There's no major difference other than the figured top. Some R8's weigh a little more and have bigger necks, but not all.

***b-squared*** · 02-20-2008, 02:02 PM

I've always thought it's in the name...the "1959 Les Paul" moniker costs more $$ to print I guess.

I've seen some gorgeous R8s here, and I have an R9 myself. You can't go wrong with either one, IMHO. If it talks to you, it's a keeper.

BB

6pack595 · 02-20-2008, 02:13 PM

They are both top shelf guitars. You can't go wrong either way. I'm not sure if it's more of a status thing to own an R9 over an R8, but my R9 really did play better than 20+ other Les Paul’s (R8,9,and 0's included) I played before buying mine. If the R8 I tried out played better, I would own it instead.

02-20-2008, 03:22 PM

The Historics started as R6s R7s R9 and R0s. They made the R8 because it was cheaper to finish than a Goldtop. Rather than make a R9 Plaintop (at first) they decided to call plaintop bursts R8s. Things evolved and changed many times from there, for marketing to work, you have to change things up a bit now and then. R8 became availible as figured tops in 96, in 99 and 00 they did not make R8s (but they made plaintop R9s) and then 01 and 02 brought a LOAD of figured top R8s.

Mike60 · 02-20-2008, 08:27 PM

as a rule,I've found the R8's to be better made than the R9's.

Darkburst · 02-20-2008, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike60

as a rule,I've found the R8's to be better made than the R9's.

Historics are all over the place. When I sold my two 2003 Brazilian board R9's, my plan was to replace them with two R8's and a TV yellow special. I went to several shops in the NYC area and played a lot of R8's. None of them made the cut for me. They either had cosmetic issues, weighed too much or didn't have the right feel. I ended up with two R9's again and some extra cash. Of course I've played some sweet R8's since then, but you never know which particular guitar is going to do it for you.

02-20-2008, 10:12 AM	#1 (permalink)
ptgold Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 460 Thanks: 5 Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts	R9 and R8 quality comparison? Hello everyone, new to the forum here. I just wanted to know what the essential difference is between the R8 and the R9 that would justify such a difference in price. I ask because im about to start shopping for an R8 very soon. Thanks

02-20-2008, 11:16 AM	#2 (permalink)
Darkburst Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 961 Thanks: 2 Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts	Re: R9 and R8 quality comparison? There's no major difference other than the figured top. Some R8's weigh a little more and have bigger necks, but not all. __________________ R9 Les Pauls / Area 51 Wah / Maxon OD808 / Korg DT10 Tuner / Reinhardt 18 1x12 combo Site \| Blog \| Photos

02-20-2008, 02:02 PM	#3 (permalink)
*b-squared* 'MLP Mid-West' Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: About 15 minutes from the LOU...(STL) Posts: 12,157 Thanks: 270 Thanked 187 Times in 28 Posts	Re: R9 and R8 quality comparison? I've always thought it's in the name...the "1959 Les Paul" moniker costs more $$ to print I guess. I've seen some gorgeous R8s here, and I have an R9 myself. You can't go wrong with either one, IMHO. If it talks to you, it's a keeper. BB __________________ I use: WB Custom Pickups--6707 VTP/VTPH, 5707 Prototypes, Habaneros, Firewaters DeTemple 'Sweet Spot' Pickups (Strat) RS Guitarworks Electronics Jonesy's Caps

02-20-2008, 02:13 PM	#4 (permalink)
6pack595 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 329 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: R9 and R8 quality comparison? They are both top shelf guitars. You can't go wrong either way. I'm not sure if it's more of a status thing to own an R9 over an R8, but my R9 really did play better than 20+ other Les Paul’s (R8,9,and 0's included) I played before buying mine. If the R8 I tried out played better, I would own it instead. __________________ ....."if I had a dollar for every beer I drank, I'd spend it on more beer!"

02-20-2008, 03:22 PM	#5 (permalink)
SKATTERBRANE Guest Posts: n/a	Re: R9 and R8 quality comparison? The Historics started as R6s R7s R9 and R0s. They made the R8 because it was cheaper to finish than a Goldtop. Rather than make a R9 Plaintop (at first) they decided to call plaintop bursts R8s. Things evolved and changed many times from there, for marketing to work, you have to change things up a bit now and then. R8 became availible as figured tops in 96, in 99 and 00 they did not make R8s (but they made plaintop R9s) and then 01 and 02 brought a LOAD of figured top R8s.

Today
Les Paul	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums

02-20-2008, 08:27 PM	#6 (permalink)
Mike60 V.I.P. Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Reflectorland Posts: 4,520 Thanks: 0 Thanked 27 Times in 12 Posts	Re: R9 and R8 quality comparison? as a rule,I've found the R8's to be better made than the R9's.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
cell inlay comparison...	Mike60	The Custom Shop	0	05-05-2008 09:01 PM
MIJ LP Comparison thread	arcanis494	Other Les Pauls	10	04-15-2008 10:09 AM
Godwood Holmes comparison	nwobhm	Pickups	2	03-18-2008 01:17 PM
R8, R9, R0 neck profile comparison.	billy	Historics & Reissues	20	02-18-2008 05:57 PM
PAF comparison audio files	FLICKOFLASH	Pickups	11	12-17-2007 05:51 AM