![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
which would you go for ?
I have a push pull sitting around doing nothing, so I might as well use it. So I can have out of phase, parrellell/series or coil tap in bridge or neck. What dya reckon ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: which would you go for ?
Wire your neck pup out of phase anyway and use the push/pull for serial/parallel. I find that more useful than coil tapping but you may not agree.
__________________
I pick up my guitar and play Just like yesterday Past Les Pauls '61 Gibson Custom Ivory ![]() '74 Gibson Black Beauty (SC) Current Single Cuts H&S 12 string tri-burst TC Ellis Series 2 Custom w/Skatterbranes. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: which would you go for ?
parallel
it's up to you, but the question was what would [ I ] go for, and I would go for it for many reasons: - No 60-cycle hum. (Like standard single coils) - Richer tone. - When distorted, less mud comes out of your amp/speaker. - More unique, not that common. - It can give you a single-coil - like vibe but doesn't get very thin as a coil tap can get. (depending on the humbucker) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: which would you go for ?
So, would this be switching the two humbuckers to serail or parelell, or each humbucker to serial/parallel ? Also anyone got a wiring diagram for this..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|