![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
Simply put, I'm ready to own a Les Paul. I've tried (mostly from borrowing friends) everything from L.P. studios, Epiphone models, a modern Double Cut, Current Standards and I'm now borrowing a vintage '68. I've liked them all and for sake of "a matter of opinion", I'd like to hear others opinions and why as to which to invest in. For those who have tried or own vintage and modern and specialty models, what are the distinct characteristic differences?
I'm loving the '68 and it has a classic, full, warm, gritty drive but seems to also be to it's limitation. I've thought the modern Double Cuts played the best with the Studios a close second. I have least tried the modern Standards so what am I missing? I've got a nice 70's gear collection going and was considering a '78 L.P. They seem to be a more affordable vintage L.P., so is there something not too fabulous about them, any decline in production those years? I saw a modern Standard in "Gecko" finish back when they came out and still have a curious interest for one. They're now harder to find. Considering either a '78 vintage or modern Standard, what differences or limitations should I expect is any? .... BTW, although I've tried all, it was never together so no A/B'ing done and it was over time in which my taste have evolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
IMO you need to find the guitar that feels o.k. to you. That includes action, resonance, sustain and a mojo that speaks to you. Then you can put whatever pickups in it that will give you the style of tone you're looking for.
You'll probably pay more for the older guitars so if that's an issue, I'd stick with the newer ones and you'll save some $$. I'm assuming you're getting this as a player not as a collector piece. But if I were you I'd care less about bridge style, finish, woods, etc. and just find what you like. Then make it your own. Hope this helps.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hicksville
Posts: 2,134
Thanks: 19
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
+1. just by what ever feels and sounds right to you thats in your price range.
some may love a 78 but i find them very heavy. not that they sound bad its just the weight bothers me. and vice versa for someone else |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() |
Re: Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
Quote:
But the point is, it sounds incredible. Is it too heavy to use every night? Maybe. Hasn't stopped me yet. I do own a couple of Standards that I use regularly as well. You really need to play a late 70's Les Paul to appreciate the tone, but you might HATE the weight absolutely. All Gibson USA product is currently chambered guitars. If you want a solid body Les Paul you have to buy a Historic, and pay 3 times as much as a Standard is worth. That is changing, soon apparently. I'm a big fan of late 70's guitars, but that doesn't mean you'll be. Try it and if you connect with it, it was meant to be! If not, you can try 'new' Les Paul's all day long at any shop in the world. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
Thanks for the the opinions. Yes I did notice that the weights listed on the the 70's were 11 lbs. plus. That may be a good thing because right now I'm using it for all studio, not gigging. I'll probably wait until my friend reclaims his '68 and get one.... out of necessity.
Like I mentioned the Studios and the Strd. Double Cut played the best to me so I'll take the "whatever plays / feels best for me" approach as recommended. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 3,188
Thanks: 98
Thanked 35 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
Yeah man play all you can and decide what suits you better. I've played old and new and like some and didnt like others its all personal prefernce tone feel etc. every year had good and bad guitars just like now.
if you find one that speaks to you pick it up and then show us the pics.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Shopping Les Paul's: Vintage or Modern?
Also don't forget to try the VOS series or maybe a nice Historic LP. They have great tone and are IMO overall a big imrpovement over the Standards of now-a-days
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Marshall vintage modern. | Shawn Fate | The Squawk Box | 69 | 06-03-2009 01:37 PM |
| Marshall 2266C (Modern Vintage series) | Big_dawg | The Squawk Box | 18 | 04-29-2008 01:25 AM |
| Marshall Vintage Modern 2266 Head | lespaul82729 | Member Classifieds | 57 | 02-20-2008 01:52 AM |
| Wiring: Why did they change? (vintage to modern) | hbucker | Historics & Reissues | 20 | 02-01-2008 05:52 PM |
| Please explain the differances-Modern vrs Vintage wiring | Starrman | Pickups | 4 | 02-01-2008 01:05 AM |
Our Network: Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum