![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Technical differences in Gibson L.P.'s
All right guys, being somewhat wet behind the ears when it comes to L.P.'s, I thought starting this thread would be a benefit to all new comers to the L.P. family. There is obviously many different types of Gibson (American made) Les Pauls. If you go on their website right now and click on Les Paul you get a-lot of choices. I would like to know what are the technical differences. They are all beautiful and unique in my eyes, but there are those that don't suit me, even if I still appreciate them. Lets start with basics. What are the differences between the Standard, Studio, Custom, Classic, and Supreme models. And lets try not to be biased and overly opinionated, as I'm sure that there's a player that Loves what you hate, and so fourth. I'm hoping that we can place the variations like the Vixen and Menace in their families as well. Oh yeah, and can we stick to the subject here, as I find that many threads start going off on tangents that don't necessarily pertain to the threads original premise. Rock on!
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() |
Re: Technical differences in Gibson L.P.'s
Basics:
Studio: Generally no binding on body or fingerboard. Generally solid not top, though there are configurations, special editions, premium editions that do have figured tops. Generally rosewood fingerboard, some ebony. I think they come chambered and unchambered, not sure exactly which ones and why. Standard: Body and neck bindings. Generally what is considered more expensive pickups. Mahogony body, maple top. Tops vary from plain to extremely figures depeding on model. I'd probably put the Supreme on the upper end of standards, as well as the classic customs. Generally rosewood fingerboard, some have ebony. Generally chambered late 2006+ model year. Custom: Standard features plus binding on the back. Binding is usually two ply. Ebony fingerboard larger block inlay. Inlay at first fret. Long neck tenon. Not chambered for the most part. Then you get into Cloud 9, VOS, Resissues, megabuck guitars with endless options. Its a start, there are so many variation of Les Pauls, it would be one huge ass chart. If you are looking to buy, I would just list what you're looking for in a Les Paul, and we can all narrow it down.
__________________
2007 Les Paul Custom 200x Fender Mary Kaye Relic V-Neck See thru Blond 2008 Fender Custom Classic V-Neck Daphne Blue 2003 MIM Strat Faded Green Metalic A couple of Alvarez Acoustics AMPS: VOX AD60VTX, Micro Cube |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Technical differences in Gibson L.P.'s
Quote:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Carolina in the Mountains
Posts: 5,224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Technical differences in Gibson L.P.'s
Some Notes here, The very first Les Paul Studios had binding,and dotted necks and were usually reddish sunburst
First Chamberings I know of, started with Les Paul Studio Lights, When the chambered holes were filled with Chromite, light metal mixture that was very dense in nature to help retain sustain qualites, some of these guitars were wired M3 H/S/H with a five way Fender style switch single volume and tone controls , unbound mutli piece flame tops in various colors pickups were 496R/500T combos Quote:
__________________
I am a sheepdog, Its not just a vocation, its my nature Live with it, Lead, Follow, or get the hell outta my way . Tis better to have the sword and live by it, than to reach in need and find the scabboard empty .Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner- Ben Franklin Don't be talkin' the talk if you can't walk the walk |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wiring differences. | Moogie_Fish | Tonefreaks | 1 | 04-25-2008 11:20 AM |
| R8 Differences. | Droog | Gibson Les Pauls | 7 | 03-16-2008 01:04 AM |
| Seriously, what are the differences? | Seymour Duncans | Gibson Les Pauls | 16 | 02-20-2008 11:47 AM |
| What are the differences between VOS R8, R9 and R0s??? Want to upgrade from my STD... | bigtoe | Historics & Reissues | 25 | 02-13-2008 11:34 AM |
| Pickup Differences | 10guitars | Gibson Les Pauls | 7 | 12-03-2007 09:55 AM |
Our Network: Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum