![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I was bored today and decided to perform a little A/B test to see the sonic differences in the two platings. My test went as follows:
The nickel plating on my Les Paul sounded fat, full, and thick with a ton of sustain and a lovely growl. The chrome plating on my strat's hardware sounded much thinner and a little more sparklier, but not even close to the sustain and fullness of the nickel. Conclusion: To my ears, nickel is a far superior plating to chrome at least sonically. Next I will include the gold plating on my custom. Hope this helped!
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eddie For This Useful Post: |
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Les Paul Forums |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
tough to tell sarcasm these days so I honestly don't know if this is a satire thread or not. With that out of there not an accurate test. If you want a fair test use the Les Paul with a nickle bridge, used the same guitar same amp same everything setting and then swap the bridge to chrome
__________________
http://shawnlutz.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NYUSA
Posts: 2,951
Thanks: 161
Thanked 97 Times in 29 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I don't know what is sillier, the fact that you did this test in April in Florida (humidity is all wrong, for sonic tests), or the fact that you did the test without changing to plating-matched cables. Just running the two through the same cables isn't gonna do it. Another thing: Science has shown, the main reason the results of this test are so hard to get correct: - You (of course) can't run the tests on two different guitars (too many variables, as Shawn pointed out) - If you swap the parts onto the same guitar, you run into all the tone-problems of re-using the same screw-holes. EVERYONE knows that the screw-holes on Gibsons are single-use (which is why original/un-modified is so desireable). Please tell me that you at least ran the test before noon, and pointed the headstock angle 13 degrees higher when testing the nickel, to compensate for the specific-gravity of the elements. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
perhaps the best way is to bind the two guitars together making them one cohesive unit and trying the test again.
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stumptown
Posts: 15,926
Thanks: 236
Thanked 236 Times in 92 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
__________________
Gibson LP Classic Antique Fireburst GOTW #2 Bolt Electric Vintage P'ups Gibson LP G0 Darkburst GuitarForce LOTB P'ups Gibson LP Special TV Yellow Fralin P-90s Gibson Limited Edition Flying V 57 Classics Fender Limited Edition Strat Fender American Ash 8502 Telecaster Fender Bullet Deluxe S2 Ibanez AR-250 SD Phat Cats Epiphone DR500M Masterbilt Epiphone 58 Reissue Korina Flying V "It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NYUSA
Posts: 2,951
Thanks: 161
Thanked 97 Times in 29 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Would introduce too many harmonic-imbalances, due to the covalent bonding.
Eddie, You've been on MLP for four years, but you're acting like you don't even understand basic Gibson-physics! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NYUSA
Posts: 2,951
Thanks: 161
Thanked 97 Times in 29 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Straplocks on a Tele?! Teles CAN'T BREAK, so I see no purpose for straplocks on them.
Oh wait, maybe you're trying to protect the floor from getting broken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Quote:
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,054
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
So as the gold plating wears off, I guess the guitar's tone will gradually improve. There is light at the end of the tunnel for the gold hardware lovers.
Can you please also thoroughly test different toggle switch tips? I'd like someone to confirm my findings that the cream ones make the guitar sound more creamy and the black ones improve sustain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Quote:
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,441
Thanks: 17
Thanked 87 Times in 14 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I performed a similar sonic test between solid and weight relieved guitars. I chose an '09 R8 for the solidbody and a Gibson J-200 for the chambered guitar. The solidbody had much more sustain, and produced a much more organic overdriven tone. The J-200 had very little sustain and squealed horribly when plugged into the overdrive channel. I concluded that chambered guitars are inferior.
__________________
Always this talk from musicians about equipment. ... It's all in the fingers and the brain/heart.--Flea |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Quote:
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,054
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Not necessary, depending on whether the jackplate is plastic or metal. Unless it has been aged. And unless you're testing on a Les Paul Classic, and depending on the greenness of the fretboard inlays.
Everybody knows that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Quote:
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 684
Thanks: 17
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I've noticed some tonal differences in certain stopbar and bridges when theyre made of different metals. Nickel being full and sustaining and chrome being rather thin but with some bite to it. But thats just what I've heard after years of owning multiple LPs with different stopbars and bridges
__________________
'98 Gibson LP Classic '98 Gibson LP Standard (3 pickup) '97 Gibson LP Studio Gem '96 Gibson LP Studio Gem (mini-hb's) '05 Gibson LP Classic Plus '01 Gibson LP Standard '07 Gibson SG Standard '05 Gibson SG Special w/P90s '07 Epiphone SG-caster '08 Gibson DSM-CE '10 Recording King Gospel Songstress '96 Fender Strat MIJ '03 PRS SE EG Marshall JCM900 combo Vox AC100CPH Peavey Royal 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Nickel ages better which is probably why it sounds better. Old looking stuff always sounds better!
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: May 2010
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 2,883
Thanks: 9
Thanked 86 Times in 44 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I found that changing to the amber switchtip produced a cornucopia of sounds that had both bloom and sustain.
__________________
.....Where the down boys go....... |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
1950's baseball card gum. Stuff is getting rare though!
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
The switchtip is often overlooked. I have amber on all of mine except the strat. I bet that's another reason the lesters sound so much fuller!
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NYUSA
Posts: 2,951
Thanks: 161
Thanked 97 Times in 29 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Eddie, I'm not sure if you realize this, but instead of "nickel", if you spend the extra 20 cents and go with "quarter", you can get a whole new world of tone and sustain.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
Man, that's an idea! I might just stick about three fiddy inside my control panel!
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I hear the Uranium 238 hardware really is the way to go. Iridium 192 is next and Cobalt 60 coming in behind that. Nickel and chrome are not where it's at these days.
__________________
1973 Les Paul Deluxe Tobacco Burst 1990 Lado Classic III 1992 HHR Stratocaster MIJ 2007 Les Paul STD 2007 Fender 62 reissue 2011 Custom Telecaster Metaltronix M-1000 Head 4x12 Fender Cab Crate V50 2x12 It's Not What It's Worth, It's What You Can Get For It |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 892
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Chrome vs nickel hardware sonic test
I'm old school! Great advances though!
__________________
Chicks don't care how long your tenon is, just that you know how to use it... Eddie 2003 Faded DC Special 2003 B7 Custom Black Beauty 2004 R7 2006 Explorer ![]() Join the Black Beauty Rockers! http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/grou...y-rockers.html |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|