My Les Paul Forums
Homepage - Sponsors - Perks - Auctions - Advertise

Go Back   My Les Paul Forums > MLP Community > The Backstage
  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2009, 07:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Hemply's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HempLand
Posts: 4,811
Thanks: 5
Thanked 91 Times in 29 Posts
TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Quote:
MIDDLETOWN, Pa. - November 22, 2009 -- The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission says the small amount of radiation detected at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant is not significant.

Specialist John White has told ABC News that there is no indication that radiation at the plant exceeded or even approached regulatory limits.

The commission sent investigators to the central Pennsylvania plant after a small amount of radiation was detected.

About 150 employees were sent home Saturday afternoon, but officials say there is no public health risk.

Exelon Nuclear spokeswoman Beth Archer says the radiation was quickly contained.

The unit has been shut for refueling and maintenance since Oct. 26. Workers are being tested for radiation exposure.

A partial meltdown occurred in Three Mile Island's Unit 2 reactor in 1979.


(Copyright ©2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
They are reporting that the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere equates to what you would experience if you were having an x-ray taken. Too bad no one who lives close to the Three Mile Island plant asked or even needed an x-ray!

On a side-note I think the extra radiation in the air is giving my vintage 1959 Les Paul Junior D/C even better tone if that's possible!
__________________


Life's to short for bad tone

>>PLONK<<

SmokeSafer

Hemply is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Les Paul

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on My Les Paul Forums
   
Old 11-23-2009, 08:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
geochem1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 7,068
Thanks: 223
Thanked 260 Times in 78 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

__________________
...

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein






geochem1st is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 08:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Hemply's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HempLand
Posts: 4,811
Thanks: 5
Thanked 91 Times in 29 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Hmmm according to the map Geo posted maybe I should consider wearing a bio-hazard suit when I go to visit Uncey Greg!
__________________


Life's to short for bad tone

>>PLONK<<

SmokeSafer

Hemply is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 08:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
delawaregold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,624
Thanks: 50
Thanked 89 Times in 21 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!


The laws of Probability, Random Chance, and
Unexpected Consequence, dictate it is not if….
but when.
__________________
The original Idiot Savant
delawaregold is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 08:16 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Hemply's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HempLand
Posts: 4,811
Thanks: 5
Thanked 91 Times in 29 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by delawaregold View Post

The laws of Probability, Random Chance, and
Unexpected Consequence, dictate it is not if….
but when.
Hey man, I took a short-cut to get down to PRS last September through Odessa/Middletown DE... I don't know what scared me more... the amount of chemical plants, or the nuclear plant sirens coming out from the middle of the corn crops!

Children of the corn!
__________________


Life's to short for bad tone

>>PLONK<<

SmokeSafer

Hemply is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
djwilbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 18,222
Thanks: 143
Thanked 238 Times in 43 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

__________________
º|||||º
djwilbanks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
delawaregold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,624
Thanks: 50
Thanked 89 Times in 21 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemply View Post
Hey man, I took a short-cut to get down to PRS last September through Odessa/Middletown DE... I don't know what scared me more... the amount of chemical plants, or the nuclear plant sirens coming out from the middle of the corn crops!

Children of the corn!

The sirens were the warning system for The Hope Creek
Nuclear Power Station at Salem New Jersey, just across
the Delaware River. That’s the backup system should TMI
fail to kill everyone. It’s designed to get even the most
hearty among us! The Chemical Plants and Oil Refineries
are just a test of your resistance. You have to have the
Immune System of a Klingon to live here.
__________________
The original Idiot Savant
delawaregold is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 04:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Cygnus X1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 344
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

From the NRC:

Quote:

"Detailed studies of the radiological consequences of the accident have been conducted by the NRC, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services), the Department of Energy, and the State of Pa.. Several independent studies have also been conducted. Estimates are that the average dose to about 2 million people in the area was only about 1 millirem. To put this into context, exposure from a chest x‑ray is about 6 millirem. Compared to the natural radioactive background dose of about 100‑125 millirem per year for the area, the collective dose to the community from the accident was very small. The maximum dose to a person at the site boundary would have been less than 100 millirem.

In the months following the accident, although questions were raised about possible adverse effects from radiation on human, animal, and plant life in the TMI area, none could be directly correlated to the accident. Thousands of environmental samples of air, water, milk, vegetation, soil, and foodstuffs were collected by various groups monitoring the area. Very low levels of radionuclides could be attributed to releases from the accident. However, comprehensive investigations and assessments by several well‑respected organizations have concluded that in spite of serious damage to the reactor, most of the radiation was contained and that the actual release had negligible effects on the physical health of individuals or the environment."

Not to say safety is not a paramount consideration, even estimates from Chernobyl were overblown.
Another quote:


"An international assessment of the health effects of the Chernobyl accident is contained in a series of reports by the United Nations Scientific Committee of the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). UNSCEAR was set up as a collaboration between various UN bodies, including the World Health Organisation, after the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to assess the long-term effects of radiation on human health.

UNSCEAR has conducted 20 years of detailed scientific and epidemiological research on the effects of the Chernobyl accident. Apart from the 57 direct deaths in the accident itself, UNSCEAR originally predicted up to 4,000 additional cancer cases due to the accident, however the latest UNSCEAR reports insinuate that these estimates were overstated. In addition, the IAEA states that there has been no increase in the rate of birth defects or abnormalities, or solid cancers (such as lung cancer) corroborating UNSCEAR's assessments.

Precisely, UNSCEAR states:

"Among the residents of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine there had been, up to 2002, about 4,000 cases of thyroid cancer reported in children and adolescents who were exposed at the time of the accident, and more cases are to be expected during the next decades. Notwithstanding problems associated with screening, many of those cancers were most likely caused by radiation exposures shortly after the accident. Apart from this increase, there is no evidence of a major public health impact attributable to radiation exposure 20 years after the accident. There is no scientific evidence of increases in overall cancer incidence or mortality rates or in rates of non-malignant disorders that could be related to radiation exposure. The risk of leukaemia in the general population, one of the main concerns owing to its short latency time, does not appear to be elevated. Although those most highly exposed individuals are at an increased risk of radiation-associated effects, the great majority of the population is not likely to experience serious health consequences as a result of radiation from the Chernobyl accident. Many other health problems have been noted in the populations that are not related to radiation exposure."

Thyroid cancer is generally treatable. The five year survival rate of thyroid cancer is 96%, and 92% after 30 years, with proper treatment."
Cygnus X1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 05:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
geochem1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 7,068
Thanks: 223
Thanked 260 Times in 78 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cygnus X1 View Post
From the NRC:

Quote:

"Detailed studies of the radiological consequences of the accident have been conducted by the NRC, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services), the Department of Energy, and the State of Pa.. Several independent studies have also been conducted. Estimates are that the average dose to about 2 million people in the area was only about 1 millirem. To put this into context, exposure from a chest x‑ray is about 6 millirem. Compared to the natural radioactive background dose of about 100‑125 millirem per year for the area, the collective dose to the community from the accident was very small. The maximum dose to a person at the site boundary would have been less than 100 millirem.

In the months following the accident, although questions were raised about possible adverse effects from radiation on human, animal, and plant life in the TMI area, none could be directly correlated to the accident. Thousands of environmental samples of air, water, milk, vegetation, soil, and foodstuffs were collected by various groups monitoring the area. Very low levels of radionuclides could be attributed to releases from the accident. However, comprehensive investigations and assessments by several well‑respected organizations have concluded that in spite of serious damage to the reactor, most of the radiation was contained and that the actual release had negligible effects on the physical health of individuals or the environment."

Thats the standard DoE boiler plate disclaimer. Been there, done that.
__________________
...

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein






geochem1st is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 06:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Cygnus X1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 344
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Sorry, Geo.
My brother is a nuke trainer/safety compliance, etc. guy.

I'll just go ahead and tell him he's full of shit.

Edit-before I get too snarky (too late), I will ask him again.
We'll be taking a two day road trip over the Thanksgiving holiday.

He has stressed that although no accident is acceptable, the release from TMI in '79 was far overblown.
He has given me sources other than the NRC, I just have to ask.
Cygnus X1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Better take a leak before boarding your next flight... martin6string The Backstage 5 10-07-2009 05:05 PM
Iran Has Second Nuclear Plant return of the mac The Backstage 213 10-02-2009 07:10 PM
Flying Springs martin6string Gibson Les Pauls 5 01-09-2009 12:19 AM
how do you set your strat springs. Paul Fender 32 01-01-2009 04:49 PM
chinese democracy leak mattfeltham The Backstage 25 09-09-2008 02:03 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Find us on Facebook!   Find us on MySpace!   Follow us on Twitter!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Our Network: Marshall Amp Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum