[singlecut]

Originally Posted by lp_junkie

Wouldn't have one, the few that I have had a chance to play weren't that impressive.
Collectors and investors created the hype and escalated the price to where guitar players can't own one. Why would I want a guitar that I couldn't play without risk in damage to it's overinflated value?

Now when the vintage guitar market tanks and those guys that mortgaged the house for them need money to buy a loaf of bread, I might consider the original 1959 price of $250.00 as being generous after all it is a used guitar.

another victim of minimun wage me thinks.
so anyone who owns a burst isn't a guitar player?, thanx for clearing that up for me.
tell ya what, why don't you sit by the phone and wait for the call on your $250.00 burst.you are by far the most generous guy i've ever seen.
ever notice it's the guys that don't own vintage ,that are always waiting for the market to tank. until that time comes vintage sucks.same crap i've been hearing since 1972.i can't afford it ,so it sucks and is overpriced.