View Single Post
Old 11-23-2009, 04:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
geochem1st
Senior Member
 
geochem1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 7,582
Thanks: 243
Thanked 274 Times in 82 Posts
Re: TMI Nuclear Plant springs a leak AGAIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cygnus X1 View Post
From the NRC:

Quote:

"Detailed studies of the radiological consequences of the accident have been conducted by the NRC, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services), the Department of Energy, and the State of Pa.. Several independent studies have also been conducted. Estimates are that the average dose to about 2 million people in the area was only about 1 millirem. To put this into context, exposure from a chest x‑ray is about 6 millirem. Compared to the natural radioactive background dose of about 100‑125 millirem per year for the area, the collective dose to the community from the accident was very small. The maximum dose to a person at the site boundary would have been less than 100 millirem.

In the months following the accident, although questions were raised about possible adverse effects from radiation on human, animal, and plant life in the TMI area, none could be directly correlated to the accident. Thousands of environmental samples of air, water, milk, vegetation, soil, and foodstuffs were collected by various groups monitoring the area. Very low levels of radionuclides could be attributed to releases from the accident. However, comprehensive investigations and assessments by several well‑respected organizations have concluded that in spite of serious damage to the reactor, most of the radiation was contained and that the actual release had negligible effects on the physical health of individuals or the environment."

Thats the standard DoE boiler plate disclaimer. Been there, done that.
__________________
...

"Elmer Fudd declared open season on Bugs Bunny, and we all know how far that got him."

Economic advance is not the same thing as human progress. ~John Clapham, A Concise Economic History of Britain, 1957





geochem1st is offline   Reply With Quote